Suppr超能文献

苔藓植物的干燥-复水测量:现状和未来的见解。

Desiccation-rehydration measurements in bryophytes: current status and future insights.

机构信息

Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Fr. R. Kreutzwaldi 5, Tartu 51006, Estonia.

Estonian Academy of Sciences, Kohtu 6, Tallinn 10130, Estonia.

出版信息

J Exp Bot. 2022 Jul 16;73(13):4338-4361. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac172.

Abstract

Desiccation-rehydration experiments have been employed over the years to evaluate desiccation tolerance of bryophytes (Bryophyta, Marchantiophyta, and Anthocerotophyta). Researchers have applied a spectrum of protocols to induce desiccation and subsequent rehydration, and a wide variety of techniques have been used to study desiccation-dependent changes in bryophyte molecular, cellular, physiological, and structural traits, resulting in a multifaceted assortment of information that is challenging to synthesize. We analysed 337 desiccation-rehydration studies, providing information for 351 species, to identify the most frequent methods used, analyse the advances in desiccation studies over the years, and characterize the taxonomic representation of the species assessed. We observed certain similarities across methodologies, but the degree of convergence among the experimental protocols was surprisingly low. Out of 52 bryophyte orders, 40% have not been studied, and data are lacking for multiple remote or difficult to access locations. We conclude that for quantitative interspecific comparisons of desiccation tolerance, rigorous standardization of experimental protocols and measurement techniques, and simultaneous use of an array of experimental techniques are required for a mechanistic insight into the different traits modified in response to desiccation. New studies should also aim to fill gaps in taxonomic, ecological, and spatial coverage of bryophytes.

摘要

多年来,人们一直采用干燥-复水实验来评估苔藓植物(苔藓植物、地钱植物和角苔植物)的干燥耐受性。研究人员应用了一系列方案来诱导干燥和随后的复水,并且广泛使用了各种技术来研究苔藓植物分子、细胞、生理和结构特征与干燥相关的变化,从而产生了大量难以综合的信息。我们分析了 337 项干燥-复水研究,为 351 个物种提供了信息,以确定最常用的方法,分析多年来干燥研究的进展,并描述所评估物种的分类代表性。我们观察到方法学上存在某些相似之处,但实验方案之间的趋同程度出人意料地低。在 52 个苔藓植物目中,有 40%尚未被研究,并且多个偏远或难以到达的地点缺乏数据。我们的结论是,为了对干燥耐受性进行定量的种间比较,需要严格标准化实验方案和测量技术,并同时使用一系列实验技术,才能深入了解不同特性对干燥的响应。新的研究还应旨在填补苔藓植物在分类学、生态学和空间覆盖范围上的空白。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验