• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于新型口服抗凝剂使用者与抗血小板药物及华法林使用者的自发性鼻出血结局的回顾性研究。

A retrospective review of spontaneous epistaxis outcomes for patients on novel oral anticoagulants compared to antiplatelets and warfarin.

作者信息

Maina Grace, Ooi Eng

机构信息

Dept of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, South Australia, Australia.

Dept of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, South Australia, Australia; College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Jul-Aug;43(4):103488. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103488. Epub 2022 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103488
PMID:35537230
Abstract

AIMS

The incidence of epistaxis-related admissions amongst elderly patients is rising due to the increasing use of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. This retrospective study evaluates the differences in outcomes for patients on warfarin, novel anticoagulants (NOACs) and antiplatelets over two different time periods.

METHODOLOGY

Retrospective case-control study with data from patients admitted with epistaxis through the Flinders Medical Centre Emergency Department in the first six months of 2013 and compared to the same period in 2018. The latter coincides with integration of NOACs into Australian prescribing practices. Included participants were ≥50 years with spontaneous epistaxis which coincides with peak incidence in adults. Exclusion criteria were epistaxis due to trauma, intrinsic coagulopathy, or recent post-surgery. Linear regression and binary logistic regression models were the statistical methods used.

RESULTS

Data from 85 patients were analysed for length of stay (LOS), readmission rates and method of haemostasis. In 2013, 41 patients were included compared to 44 in 2018, suggesting a 7% increase in admissions rates but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.96). The proportion of patients admitted with epistaxis while taking an anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent increased from 66% in 2013 to 93% in 2018. Thirty six percent of patients in 2018 were taking NOACs, however, LOS was 2 times shorter (mean ratio = 2.08 days, 95% CI: 1.03, 4.19). Seven percent of patients in 2018 had bleeding requiring surgery or interventional radiology, compared to 12% in 2013, but this was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in readmission rates (p = 0.82) or intervention required (p = 0.74) between the two time periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Epistaxis admissions at our institution have increased since the introduction of NOACs. However, most patients can be managed successfully with intranasal packing and cautery alone. NOACs are not associated with increased rated of invasive haemostatic measures and patients have a shorter LOS.

摘要

目的

由于抗凝剂和抗血小板药物的使用增加,老年患者鼻出血相关住院率正在上升。这项回顾性研究评估了华法林、新型抗凝剂(NOACs)和抗血小板药物在两个不同时间段内患者的结局差异。

方法

回顾性病例对照研究,收集2013年前六个月通过弗林德斯医疗中心急诊科因鼻出血入院患者的数据,并与2018年同期进行比较。后者恰逢NOACs纳入澳大利亚处方实践。纳入的参与者年龄≥50岁,有自发性鼻出血,这与成年人的发病率高峰一致。排除标准为因外伤、先天性凝血障碍或近期手术后引起的鼻出血。使用线性回归和二元逻辑回归模型作为统计方法。

结果

分析了85例患者的住院时间(LOS)、再入院率和止血方法的数据。2013年纳入41例患者,2018年为44例,表明入院率增加了7%,但无统计学意义(p = 0.96)。服用抗凝剂或抗血小板药物时因鼻出血入院的患者比例从2013年的66%增加到2018年的93%。2018年36%的患者服用NOACs,然而,住院时间缩短了2倍(平均比值=2.08天,95%CI:1.03,4.19)。2018年7%的患者出血需要手术或介入放射治疗,而2013年为12%,但无统计学意义。两个时间段之间的再入院率(p = 0.82)或所需干预措施(p = 0.74)无统计学显著差异。

结论

自引入NOACs以来,我们机构的鼻出血住院人数有所增加。然而,大多数患者仅通过鼻内填塞和烧灼即可成功治疗。NOACs与侵入性止血措施发生率增加无关,且患者住院时间较短。

相似文献

1
A retrospective review of spontaneous epistaxis outcomes for patients on novel oral anticoagulants compared to antiplatelets and warfarin.一项关于新型口服抗凝剂使用者与抗血小板药物及华法林使用者的自发性鼻出血结局的回顾性研究。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Jul-Aug;43(4):103488. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103488. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
The Impact of Traditional Anticoagulants, Novel Anticoagulants, and Antiplatelets on Epistaxis.传统抗凝剂、新型抗凝剂和抗血小板药物对鼻出血的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Sep;131(9):1946-1951. doi: 10.1002/lary.29417. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
3
Epistaxis in the setting of antithrombotic therapy: A comparison between factor Xa inhibitors, warfarin, and antiplatelet agents.抗血栓治疗背景下的鼻出血:Xa因子抑制剂、华法林和抗血小板药物之间的比较。
Laryngoscope. 2019 Jan;129(1):119-123. doi: 10.1002/lary.27400. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Association of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Among Patients Taking Non-Vitamin K Antagonist vs Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants With In-Hospital Mortality.服用非维生素K拮抗剂与维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂的患者发生脑出血与院内死亡率的关联
JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):463-473. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21917.
5
Management and outcome of epistaxis under direct oral anticoagulants: a comparison with warfarin.直接口服抗凝剂相关鼻出血的管理和结局:与华法林的比较。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Jan;9(1):120-124. doi: 10.1002/alr.22210. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
6
Rebleeding and Mortality After Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Taking Antiplatelets or Anticoagulants.抗血小板或抗凝药物治疗患者的下消化道出血再出血和死亡率。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;17(7):1276-1284.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.032. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
7
Epistaxis in patients taking oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication: prospective cohort study.服用口服抗凝药和抗血小板药物患者的鼻出血:前瞻性队列研究。
J Laryngol Otol. 2011 Jan;125(1):38-42. doi: 10.1017/S0022215110001921. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
8
Does the continuation of warfarin change management outcomes in epistaxis patients?继续使用华法林会改变鼻出血患者的治疗结果吗?
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 Mar;130(3):256-60. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115003424. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
9
Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Ground-level Fall With Antiplatelet or Anticoagulant Agents.使用抗血小板或抗凝药物时平地跌倒导致颅内出血的风险
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;24(10):1258-1266. doi: 10.1111/acem.13217. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
10
Risk factors and management outcomes in epistaxis: a tertiary centre experience.鼻出血的危险因素及治疗结果:一家三级中心的经验
ANZ J Surg. 2023 Mar;93(3):555-560. doi: 10.1111/ans.18179. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Success of Apheresis Platelet Replacement in Patients With Antiaggregant Drug-Associated Epistaxis and Cost Effectiveness Analysis.抗血小板药物相关性鼻出血患者单采血小板置换治疗的成功及成本效益分析
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Apr;77(4):1775-1781. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05399-3. Epub 2025 Mar 1.