Key Laboratory for Humid Subtropical Eco-geographical Processes of the Ministry of Education, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Eco-Physiology, School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350007, China.
Key Laboratory for Humid Subtropical Eco-geographical Processes of the Ministry of Education, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Eco-Physiology, School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350007, China.
Chemosphere. 2022 Sep;302:134869. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134869. Epub 2022 May 7.
Biochar-derived dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) and smoke-derived dissolved organic carbon (SDOC) are two different biomass-pyrogenic DOCs. They inevitably enter soil and water, then potentially pose different impacts on the chemistry of these media. This study systemically investigated the emissions and spectral characteristics of BDOC and SDOC as well as their differences from natural DOC. The results showed that the emission of SDOC was 1-3 orders of magnitude greater than that of BDOC after biomass pyrolysis. UV-vis spectra indicated that BDOC had higher aromaticity and molecular weight as well as lower polarity than SDOC. The two-dimensional correlation infrared spectrum (2D-PCIS) matrix indicated that BDOC contained more chemical groups with stronger temperature-dependence than SDOC. Fluorescence EEM-PARAFAC analysis showed that BDOC was dominated by macromolecular humic-like substances, while SDOC was primarily composed of small molecules of aromatic protein/polyphenols-like compounds. The fluorescence indicators including humification index (HIX) (0.08-0.76) and biological index (BIX) (1.18-1.72) of SDOC were significantly different from those of BDOC (HIX: 1.64-12.68, and BIX: 0.17-1.62). The higher BIX and more small molecules of aromatic protein/polyphenols-like compounds indicated SDOC had potentially higher bioavailability and turnover rate in the environment than BDOC. Furthermore, the UV-vis spectral indicator (S) and fluorescence spectral indicators (HIX, and BIX) of BDOC were equivalent to those of natural DOC, whereas these indicators of SDOC were significantly different from those of natural DOC. This study demonstrated that BDOC and SDOC had significantly different components and properties and they might present different environmental behaviors and effects.
生物炭衍生溶解有机碳(BDOC)和烟雾衍生溶解有机碳(SDOC)是两种不同的生物质热解源溶解有机碳。它们不可避免地进入土壤和水中,然后可能对这些介质的化学性质产生不同的影响。本研究系统地研究了 BDOC 和 SDOC 的排放特征和光谱特征及其与天然 DOC 的差异。结果表明,生物质热解后 SDOC 的排放是 BDOC 的 1-3 个数量级。紫外可见光谱表明,BDOC 的芳香度、分子量和极性均高于 SDOC。二维相关红外光谱(2D-PCIS)矩阵表明,BDOC 含有更多的化学基团,其温度依赖性比 SDOC 更强。荧光 EEM-PARAFAC 分析表明,BDOC 主要由大分子腐殖质样物质组成,而 SDOC 主要由小分子芳香蛋白/多酚类化合物组成。荧光指标包括腐殖化指数(HIX)(0.08-0.76)和生物指数(BIX)(1.18-1.72),SDOC 的荧光指标明显不同于 BDOC 的荧光指标(HIX:0.08-0.76,BIX:1.18-1.72)。SDOC 的较高 BIX 和更多的小分子芳香蛋白/多酚类化合物表明,SDOC 在环境中的生物利用度和周转率可能高于 BDOC。此外,BDOC 的紫外可见光谱指标(S)和荧光光谱指标(HIX 和 BIX)与天然 DOC 的相当,而 SDOC 的这些指标与天然 DOC 的明显不同。本研究表明,BDOC 和 SDOC 具有明显不同的成分和性质,它们可能表现出不同的环境行为和影响。