Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Jul;57(7):1164-1170. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01701-x. Epub 2022 May 10.
Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) has been proven to be feasible and efficient in several types of malignancies before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Given its favorable reduced toxicity profile, we introduced Treo/Flu as conditioning before autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT) in patients with B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Treo/Flu in comparison to TEAM. Fifty-seven patients with NHL received auto-HSCT after conditioning with either Treo/Flu (n = 22) or TEAM (n = 35). All patients achieved sustained engraftment. PFS, EFS and OS were not significant in both groups. Of note is that patients in the Treo/Flu group were less dependent on thrombocyte transfusions (p = 0.0082), significantly older (in median 11 years, p < 0.0001) and suffered less frequently from infectious complications (p = 0.0105), mucositis and stomatitis (p < 0.0001). This study is the first to present efficacy, feasibility, and safety of conditioning with Treo/Flu preceding auto-HSCT in patients with NHL. Since it demonstrated a lack of significant difference in comparison to TEAM conditioning it might be a valuable alternative especially in elderly patients with B-cell NHL and comorbidities. Further evaluation by prospective clinical trials is warranted.
在异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)前,用三氟尿苷和氟达拉滨(Treo/Flu)预处理已被证明在多种恶性肿瘤中是可行和有效的。鉴于其毒性降低的优势,我们在接受自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HSCT)的 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者中引入了 Treo/Flu 预处理。本研究旨在评估 Treo/Flu 与 TEAM 相比的疗效和安全性。57 例 NHL 患者接受了 Treo/Flu(n=22)或 TEAM(n=35)预处理的 auto-HSCT。所有患者均实现了持续的植入。两组患者的 PFS、EFS 和 OS 均无显著差异。值得注意的是,Treo/Flu 组患者对血小板输注的依赖性较低(p=0.0082),年龄中位数明显较大(11 岁,p<0.0001),感染并发症(p=0.0105)、黏膜炎和口腔炎(p<0.0001)的发生率较低。本研究首次报道了 Treo/Flu 预处理在 NHL 患者中进行自体造血干细胞移植的疗效、可行性和安全性。与 TEAM 预处理相比,它没有显示出显著差异,因此对于伴有合并症的老年 B 细胞 NHL 患者,可能是一种有价值的替代方案。需要前瞻性临床试验进一步评估。