Suppr超能文献

评估链球菌性咽炎的快速检测:当比较标准存在误差时诊断检测的表观准确性。

Evaluating rapid tests for streptococcal pharyngitis: the apparent accuracy of a diagnostic test when there are errors in the standard of comparison.

作者信息

Deneef P

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1987 Apr-Jun;7(2):92-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8700700205.

Abstract

The evaluation of new rapid antigen detection tests for streptococcal pharyngitis is complicated by the presence of errors in the standard of comparison. Even "gold standard" throat cultures are not perfectly accurate. This article is an analysis of how errors in the comparison cultures affect the apparent accuracy of new tests for streptococcal pharyngitis. One of the questions addressed is whether throat cultures performed in a physician's office are accurate enough to use as a standard in a clinical trial of a new rapid test. While the accuracy of office cultures is accepted by many to be adequate for diagnostic purposes, this analysis shows that when evaluating a new test stricter conditions must be placed on the accuracy of the cultures used for comparison.

摘要

用于链球菌性咽炎的新型快速抗原检测试验的评估因比较标准中存在误差而变得复杂。即使是“金标准”咽喉培养也并非完全准确。本文分析了比较培养中的误差如何影响链球菌性咽炎新检测方法的表观准确性。所探讨的问题之一是,在医生办公室进行的咽喉培养是否准确到足以用作新型快速检测临床试验的标准。虽然许多人认为办公室培养的准确性足以用于诊断目的,但该分析表明,在评估新检测方法时,必须对用于比较的培养的准确性设定更严格的条件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验