Tanz Robert R, Gerber Michael A, Kabat William, Rippe Jason, Seshadri Roopa, Shulman Stanford T
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Memorial Hospital and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.
Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):437-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0488.
The goals were to establish performance characteristics of a rapid antigen-detection test and blood agar plate culture performed and interpreted in community pediatric offices and to assess the effect of the pretest likelihood of group A streptococcus pharyngitis on test performance (spectrum bias).
Two throat swabs were collected from 1848 children 3 to 18 years of age who were evaluated for acute pharyngitis between November 15, 2004, and May 15, 2005, in 6 community pediatric offices. One swab was used to perform the rapid antigen-detection test and a blood agar plate culture in the office and the other was sent to our laboratory for blood agar plate culture. Clinical findings were used to calculate the McIsaac score for each patient. The sensitivities of the office tests were calculated, with the hospital laboratory culture results as the criterion standard.
Thirty percent of laboratory blood agar plate cultures yielded group A streptococcus (range among sites: 21%-36%). Rapid antigen-detection test sensitivity was 70% (range: 61%-80%). Office culture sensitivity was significantly greater, 81% (range: 71%-91%). Rapid antigen-detection test specificity was 98% (range: 98%-99.5%), and office culture specificity was 97% (range: 94%-99%), a difference that was not statistically significant. The sensitivity of a combined approach using the rapid antigen-detection test and back-up office culture was 85%. Among patients with McIsaac scores of >2, rapid antigen-detection test sensitivity was 78%, office culture sensitivity was 87%, and combined approach sensitivity was 91%. Positive diagnostic test results were significantly associated with McIsaac scores of >2.
The sensitivity of the office culture was significantly greater than the sensitivity of the rapid antigen-detection test, but neither test was highly sensitive. The sensitivities of each diagnostic modality and the recommended combined approach were best among patients with greater pretest likelihood of group A streptococcus pharyngitis.
目标是确定在社区儿科诊所进行并解读的快速抗原检测试验和血琼脂平板培养的性能特征,并评估A组链球菌性咽炎的预检可能性对检测性能的影响(谱偏倚)。
2004年11月15日至2005年5月15日期间,在6个社区儿科诊所对1848名3至18岁因急性咽炎接受评估的儿童采集了两份咽拭子。一份拭子用于在诊所进行快速抗原检测试验和血琼脂平板培养,另一份送至我们实验室进行血琼脂平板培养。临床检查结果用于计算每名患者的麦基萨克评分。以医院实验室培养结果作为标准,计算诊所检测的敏感性。
30%的实验室血琼脂平板培养培养出A组链球菌(各地点范围:21% - 36%)。快速抗原检测试验的敏感性为70%(范围:61% - 80%)。诊所培养的敏感性显著更高,为81%(范围:71% - 91%)。快速抗原检测试验的特异性为98%(范围:98% - 99.5%),诊所培养的特异性为97%(范围:94% - 99%),差异无统计学意义。使用快速抗原检测试验和备用诊所培养的联合方法的敏感性为85%。在麦基萨克评分>2的患者中,快速抗原检测试验的敏感性为78%,诊所培养的敏感性为87%,联合方法的敏感性为91%。阳性诊断试验结果与麦基萨克评分>2显著相关。
诊所培养的敏感性显著高于快速抗原检测试验的敏感性,但两种检测方法的敏感性均不高。在A组链球菌性咽炎预检可能性较高的患者中,每种诊断方法及推荐的联合方法的敏感性最佳。