Suppr超能文献

颈动脉手术中的技术争议

Technical controversies in carotid artery surgery.

作者信息

Loftus C M, Quest D O

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1987 Mar;20(3):490-5. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198703000-00026.

Abstract

Carotid endarterectomy has become a routine and safe therapeutic strategy in most neurovascular centers. Wide diversity of opinion and considerable debate, however, persists concerning the ideal methods of anesthetic management, cerebral protection, intraoperative monitoring, and arterial repair. We have examined and summarized the current status of these controversies and have identified several new techniques that hold promise for further development.

摘要

在大多数神经血管中心,颈动脉内膜切除术已成为一种常规且安全的治疗策略。然而,关于麻醉管理、脑保护、术中监测及动脉修复的理想方法,仍存在广泛的意见分歧和大量的争论。我们审视并总结了这些争议的现状,并确定了几种有望进一步发展的新技术。

相似文献

1
Technical controversies in carotid artery surgery.颈动脉手术中的技术争议
Neurosurgery. 1987 Mar;20(3):490-5. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198703000-00026.
2
The value of intraoperative EEG monitoring during carotid endarterectomy.
Ann Neurol. 1986 Oct;20(4):508-12. doi: 10.1002/ana.410200411.
4
The use of electroencephalography in carotid endarterectomy.脑电图在颈动脉内膜切除术中的应用。
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1990 Summer;28(3):143-6. doi: 10.1097/00004311-199002830-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
The carotid endarterectomy: experience with 260 cases and discussion of the indications.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;112(1-2):1-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01402446.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验