• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验的脆弱指数荟萃分析显示,<3 小时静脉内使用阿替普酶具有高度稳健的证据强度获益。

Fragility Index Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Shows Highly Robust Evidential Strength for Benefit of <3 Hour Intravenous Alteplase.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (K.T.M., D.S.L., J.L.S.).

Departments of Emergency Medicine, Neurosurgery/Neurocritical Care, and Neurology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, OH (J.B.B.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2022 Jun;53(6):2069-2074. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.038153. Epub 2022 May 11.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.038153
PMID:35543129
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cumulative fragility index (FI) analysis enables quantification of the evidential strength of intravenous alteplase's core indication-treatment of disabling acute ischemic stroke within 3 hours of onset.

METHODS

Meta-analyses were performed (study level) or identified (individual participant level) for freedom-from-disability (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1, primary efficacy), functional independence (mRS score 0-2, secondary efficacy), and mortality outcomes. Individual trial and cumulative FI analyses were serially conducted after each successive randomized controlled trial (RCT). FI scores were classified as follows: not robust (FI 0-4), somewhat robust (FI 5-12), robust (FI 13-33), and highly robust (FI >33).

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials were identified from 1995 to 2021 of within-3-hour intravenous alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. In study-level meta-analyses, alteplase increased freedom-from-disability outcome (mRS score 0-1), 31.0% versus 22.3%, relative risk, 1.39 (95% CI, 1.20-1.61); <0.00001; increased functional independence (mRS score 0-2), 39.7% versus 31.2%, relative risk, 1.29 (95% CI, 1.14-1.45), <0.000; and did not alter mortality, 24.1% versus 26.1%; =0.23. Overall FIs for study-level meta-analyses were both highly robust at 42 and 40 for mRS score 0-1 and mRS score 0-2, respectively. Serial FI analyses showed robust evidential strength for intravenous alteplase superiority with publication of the 2 NINDS-tPA trials (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-tissue-type plasminogen activator) in 1995, increased to highly robust in 2012, and remains highly robust in 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

Within-3-hour intravenous alteplase for acute ischemic stroke is one of the most robustly proven therapies in medicine. The initial concurrent trials 25 years ago showed robust evidence for benefit and, after additional studies, advanced to highly robust.

摘要

背景

累积脆弱指数(FI)分析能够定量评估静脉注射阿替普酶治疗发病 3 小时内的致残性急性缺血性脑卒中的证据强度。

方法

对无残疾(改良 Rankin 量表 [mRS]评分 0-1,主要疗效)、功能独立性(mRS 评分 0-2,次要疗效)和死亡率结局进行了荟萃分析(研究水平)或识别(个体参与者水平)。在每项连续的随机对照试验(RCT)后,分别进行了个体试验和累积 FI 分析。FI 评分如下分类:不稳健(FI 0-4)、有些稳健(FI 5-12)、稳健(FI 13-33)和高度稳健(FI>33)。

结果

1995 年至 2021 年间,共确定了 9 项发病 3 小时内静脉内阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的 RCT。在研究水平的荟萃分析中,阿替普酶增加了无残疾结局(mRS 评分 0-1),31.0%比 22.3%,相对风险 1.39(95%CI,1.20-1.61);<0.00001;增加了功能独立性(mRS 评分 0-2),39.7%比 31.2%,相对风险 1.29(95%CI,1.14-1.45);<0.000;且不改变死亡率,24.1%比 26.1%;=0.23。研究水平荟萃分析的整体 FI 均高度稳健,mRS 评分 0-1 和 mRS 评分 0-2 分别为 42 和 40。连续的 FI 分析显示,静脉内阿替普酶的优势具有稳健的证据强度,1995 年发表了 2 项 NINDS-tPA 试验(美国国立神经病学与卒中研究所-组织型纤溶酶原激活剂),2012 年增加到高度稳健,2021 年仍然高度稳健。

结论

发病 3 小时内静脉内注射阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中是医学上最有力的治疗方法之一。25 年前的初始平行试验显示出了获益的有力证据,并且在进行了更多的研究后,其稳健性进一步提高到高度稳健。

相似文献

1
Fragility Index Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Shows Highly Robust Evidential Strength for Benefit of <3 Hour Intravenous Alteplase.随机对照试验的脆弱指数荟萃分析显示,<3 小时静脉内使用阿替普酶具有高度稳健的证据强度获益。
Stroke. 2022 Jun;53(6):2069-2074. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.038153. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Does Not Impact Mortality in Acute Ischemic Stroke at Any Time Point up to 6 Months: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.静脉注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂在长达6个月的任何时间点均不影响急性缺血性卒中的死亡率:一项随机对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
CNS Drugs. 2015 Aug;29(8):659-67. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0265-8.
3
In ischemic stroke, IV alteplase within 3 h of onset improves functional outcome vs. control.在缺血性脑卒中患者中,发病 3 小时内静脉注射阿替普酶与对照组相比可改善功能结局。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Sep;175(9):JC107. doi: 10.7326/J22-0069. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
Thrombolysis with alteplase 3-4.5 hours after acute ischaemic stroke: trial reanalysis adjusted for baseline imbalances.阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中 3-4.5 小时:调整基线失衡的试验重新分析。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Oct;25(5):168-171. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111386. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment with or without intravenous alteplase in acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管内治疗联合或不联合静脉内阿替普酶治疗急性前循环大动脉闭塞性卒中的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Jun;43(6):3551-3563. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06017-8. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
6
Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 Hours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗 4.5 小时内急性缺血性脑卒中的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2024 Nov 12;103(9):e209903. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209903. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
7
Low-Dose Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.低剂量组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性缺血性卒中:一项系统评价和Meta分析
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Feb;27(2):381-390. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
8
Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2001;1(4):281-92. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200101040-00006.
9
Intravenous alteplase for stroke with unknown time of onset guided by advanced imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.基于高级影像学指导的不明起病时间的卒中患者静脉内使用阿替普酶:个体化患者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2020 Nov 14;396(10262):1574-1584. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32163-2. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
10
Effect of Argatroban Plus Intravenous Alteplase vs Intravenous Alteplase Alone on Neurologic Function in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAIS Randomized Clinical Trial.阿加曲班联合静脉注射阿替普酶与单独静脉注射阿替普酶对急性缺血性脑卒中患者神经功能的影响:ARAIS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Feb 28;329(8):640-650. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0550.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of early neuroendovascular team involvement in acute stroke protocol: a retrospective study.早期神经血管介入团队参与急性卒中治疗方案的效果:一项回顾性研究。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 17;16:1568572. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1568572. eCollection 2025.
2
How trustworthy and applicable is the evidence from systematic reviews of depression treatments: Protocol for systematic examination.抑郁症治疗系统评价的证据有多可靠及适用性如何:系统审查方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0325384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325384. eCollection 2025.
3
Endovascular thrombectomy in acute stroke with a large ischemic core: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
急性卒中合并大面积缺血核心区的血管内血栓切除术:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS Med. 2025 Apr 17;22(4):e1004484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004484. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Factor XIa Inhibitors in Stroke Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.口服凝血因子 XIa 抑制剂预防卒中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 26;12(17):5562. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175562.
5
Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Fragility Index Meta-Analysis.急性基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗:一项脆弱性指数的荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 30;12(7):2617. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072617.
6
Prolonged cardiac monitoring for stroke prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled clinical trials.长时间心脏监测预防中风:随机对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Mar;8(1):106-116. doi: 10.1177/23969873221139410. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
7
Endovascular treatment for anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion ischemic stroke with low ASPECTS: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低ASPECTS的前循环大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中的血管内治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2022 Nov 29;15:17562864221139632. doi: 10.1177/17562864221139632. eCollection 2022.