Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Jun 22;11(6):470-480. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac048.
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for refractory cardiac arrest (CA) is used in selected cases. The incidence of ECPR-eligible patients is not known. The aim of this study was to identify the ECPR-eligible patients among in-hospital CAs (IHCA) in Sweden and to estimate the potential gain in survival and neurological outcome, if ECPR was to be used.
Data between 1 January 2015 and 30 August 2019 were extracted from the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Register (SCAR). Two arbitrary groups were defined, based on restrictive or liberal inclusion criteria. In both groups, logistic regression was used to determine survival and cerebral performance category (CPC) for conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cCPR). When ECPR was assumed to be possible, it was considered equivalent to return of spontaneous circulation, and the previous logistic regression model was applied to define outcome for comparison of conventional CPR and ECPR. The assumption in the model was a minimum of 15 min of refractory CA and 5 min of cannulation. A total of 9209 witnessed IHCA was extracted from SCAR. Depending on strictness of inclusion, an average of 32-64 patients/year remains in refractory after 20 min of cCPR, theoretically eligible for ECPR. If optimal conditions for ECPR are assumed and potential negative side effects disregarded of, the estimated potential benefit of survival of ECPR in Sweden would be 10-19 (0.09-0.19/100 000) patients/year, when a 30% success rate is expected. The benefit of ECPR on survival and CPC scoring was found to be detrimental over time and minimal at 60 min of cCPR.
The number of ECPR-eligible patients among IHCA in Sweden is dependent on selection criteria and predicted to be low. There is an estimated potential benefit of ECPR, on survival and neurological outcome if initiated within 60 min of the IHCA.
体外心肺复苏(ECPR)用于治疗难治性心脏骤停(CA),并在选定的病例中使用。目前尚不清楚 ECPR 适用患者的发病率。本研究的目的是确定瑞典院内心脏骤停(IHCA)中的 ECPR 适用患者,并估计如果使用 ECPR,生存和神经功能结局的潜在获益。
2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 8 月 30 日期间,从瑞典心脏骤停登记处(SCAR)提取数据。根据严格或宽松的纳入标准,定义了两个任意组。在这两组中,均使用逻辑回归来确定常规心肺复苏(cCPR)的生存和脑功能分类(CPC)。假设 ECPR 可能实现,将其等同于自主循环恢复,并应用之前的逻辑回归模型来定义比较常规 CPR 和 ECPR 的结果。该模型的假设是至少 20 分钟难治性 CA 和 5 分钟的插管时间。从 SCAR 中提取了 9209 例有目击者的 IHCA。根据纳入标准的严格程度,平均每年有 32-64 例患者/年在 cCPR 后 20 分钟仍处于难治性状态,理论上有资格接受 ECPR。如果假设 ECPR 的最佳条件,并且忽略潜在的负面副作用,预计在瑞典 ECPR 的生存获益估计为 10-19(0.09-0.19/100000)例/年,预期成功率为 30%。随着时间的推移,发现 ECPR 对生存和 CPC 评分的获益呈有害趋势,在 cCPR 60 分钟时获益最小。
瑞典 IHCA 中 ECPR 适用患者的数量取决于选择标准,预计数量较少。如果在 IHCA 后 60 分钟内开始 ECPR,则估计有潜在的生存和神经功能结局获益。