• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩袖撕裂的国际关节镜、膝关节外科和运动医学学会(ISAKOS)分类系统具有可靠的观察者间和观察者内一致性。

Reliable interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) classification system of rotator cuff tears.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma. Madrid, Spain.

Centro Ortopédico Panama Clinic, The Panama Clinic, Panama City, Panama.

出版信息

J ISAKOS. 2022 Apr;7(2):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jisako.2021.12.004
PMID:35543666
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The ISAKOS Shoulder Committee developed a new comprehensive classification system aimed to describe all rotator cuff tears. The five characteristics of the tears included are pattern (P), extension (E), fatty atrophy (A), retraction (R), and location (L), conforming to the acronym "PEARL." The objective of this study is to assess if the ISAKOS Rotator Cuff Tear Classification System is reliable by measuring the intraobserver and interobserver multirater reliability.

METHODS

Arthroscopic videos of 36 rotator cuff tears, including tears of varying sizes and configurations, were evaluated twice by four surgeons from different continents blinded to tear type. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was measured using multirater and intraobserver Kappa coefficients.

RESULTS

Intraobserver reliability: An almost perfect agreement for "location" (κ = 0.98), substantial agreement for "extension" (κ = 0.73) were obtained for mean intrarater kappa, lower κ agreement for "pattern" (κ = 0.58), and relatively high agreement of 0.79 for "retraction." Every characteristic of "location" had an almost perfect agreement among the surgeons (κ = 0.91). Intrarrater reliability: In the partial-thickness posterosuperior tears "location," there was good agreement in tears involving less than 50% of the tendon (κ = 0.74) and moderate in those deeper than 50% of the tendon thickness (κ = 0.58). "Extension" in full-thickness posterosuperior RCT achieved moderate agreement. Within the anterior subscapularis tears, we have a substantial agreement in Lafosse´s Type 1 (κ = 0.73), moderate in Types 2 and 3 (κ = 0.45 and κ = 0.46) and slight agreement in Type 4 (κ = 0.06). The overall kappa summarizing all categories indicated moderate agreement (κ = 0.52). The articular pattern in the partial-thickness posterosuperior RCT "location" had a perfect kappa of 1, while the bursal pattern showed an almost complete agreement (κ = 0.87). In the full-thickness posterosuperior RCTs, we observed fair agreement in C, U, and reverse L configurations and slight agreement in L pattern (κ = 0.18). The overall kappa is 0.44 with a confidence interval of 0.41-0.47. There was substantial agreement in every category and the overall kappa for "retraction" (k = 0.70).

CONCLUSION

ISAKOS rotator cuff tear classification system provides sufficient interobserver reliability for communicating among surgeons and for pooling of data from clinical studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

摘要

目的

ISAKOS 肩关节委员会开发了一种新的综合分类系统,旨在描述所有肩袖撕裂。撕裂的五个特征包括:形态(P)、延伸(E)、脂肪萎缩(A)、回缩(R)和位置(L),符合“PEARL”的缩写。本研究的目的是通过测量观察者内和观察者间多评分者可靠性来评估 ISAKOS 肩袖撕裂分类系统是否可靠。

方法

对 36 例肩袖撕裂的关节镜视频进行评估,包括不同大小和类型的撕裂。来自不同大陆的 4 名外科医生在不知道撕裂类型的情况下对撕裂进行了两次评估。使用多评分者和观察者内 Kappa 系数测量观察者内和观察者间可靠性。

结果

观察者内可靠性:对于“位置”,获得了近乎完美的一致性(κ=0.98);对于“延伸”,获得了实质性的一致性(κ=0.73);对于“形态”,获得了较低的 κ 一致性(κ=0.58);对于“回缩”,则获得了相对较高的 0.79 一致性。“位置”的每个特征在外科医生之间都具有近乎完美的一致性(κ=0.91)。观察者内可靠性:在前上侧部分厚度撕裂的“位置”中,对于累及肌腱小于 50%的撕裂,具有良好的一致性(κ=0.74),对于累及肌腱厚度大于 50%的撕裂,具有中度一致性(κ=0.58)。在前上侧全厚度 RCT 中,“延伸”获得了中度一致性。在前下肩胛下肌撕裂中,Lafosse 1 型(κ=0.73)具有实质性一致性,2 型和 3 型(κ=0.45 和 κ=0.46)具有中度一致性,4 型(κ=0.06)具有轻度一致性。总结所有类别的总体 κ 值表明具有中度一致性(κ=0.52)。在前上侧部分厚度 RCT“位置”的关节形态中,κ 值为 1,具有完美的一致性,而滑囊形态则具有近乎完全的一致性(κ=0.87)。在前上侧全厚度 RCT 中,我们观察到 C、U 和反向 L 形态具有良好的一致性,而 L 形态具有轻度的一致性(κ=0.18)。总体 κ 值为 0.44,置信区间为 0.41-0.47。每个类别的一致性都很好,回缩的总体 κ 值为 0.70。

结论

ISAKOS 肩袖撕裂分类系统为外科医生之间的沟通和临床研究数据的汇总提供了足够的观察者间可靠性。

研究设计

队列研究(诊断);证据水平,2 级。

相似文献

1
Reliable interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) classification system of rotator cuff tears.肩袖撕裂的国际关节镜、膝关节外科和运动医学学会(ISAKOS)分类系统具有可靠的观察者间和观察者内一致性。
J ISAKOS. 2022 Apr;7(2):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
2
Interobserver reliability of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) classification of meniscal tears.半月板撕裂的国际关节镜、膝关节外科和运动医学学会(ISAKOS)分类的观察者间可靠性。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 May;39(5):926-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546511400533. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
3
Interobserver agreement in the classification of rotator cuff tears using magnetic resonance imaging.使用磁共振成像对肩袖撕裂进行分类时的观察者间一致性。
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):99-103. doi: 10.1177/0363546507307504. Epub 2007 Oct 11.
4
Magnetic resonance imaging identification of rotator cuff retears after repair: interobserver and intraobserver agreement.磁共振成像识别修复后肩袖再撕裂:观察者间和观察者内一致性。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):1722-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546512449424. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
5
Interobserver agreement in the classification of rotator cuff tears.肩袖撕裂分类中的观察者间一致性。
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):437-41. doi: 10.1177/0363546506298108. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
6
Preoperative agreement on the geometric classification and 2-dimensional measurement of rotator cuff tears based on magnetic resonance arthrography.术前基于磁共振关节造影术的肩袖撕裂的几何分类和二维测量的协议。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct;28(10):1329-36. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.054. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
7
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Goutallier classification using magnetic resonance imaging: proposal of a simplified classification system to increase reliability.磁共振成像评估戈特利尔分级的观察者间和观察者内可靠性:提出一种简化分类系统以提高可靠性。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):1728-34. doi: 10.1177/0363546512452714. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
8
Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Copeland-Levy classification for arthroscopic evaluation of subacromial impingement.关节镜评估肩峰下撞击症时 Copeland-Levy 分类的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Dec;26(12):2167-2172. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.018. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
9
Inter-rater agreement of the Goutallier, Patte, and Warner classification scores using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rotator cuff tears.术前磁共振成像在肩袖撕裂患者中应用 Goutallier、Patte 和 Warner 分级评分的组内一致性。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Feb;28(2):154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.016. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
10
Magnetic resonance imaging reproducibility for rotator cuff partial tears in patients up to 60 years.磁共振成像对 60 岁以下肩袖部分撕裂患者的可重复性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Aug 21;20(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2760-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating diagnostic consistency: intra and interobserver agreement in rotator cuff tear classification using ultrasound videos.评估诊断一致性:使用超声视频进行肩袖撕裂分类时观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性
Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s00256-025-05009-x.
2
A Pilot Study Comparing Intentional Shoulder Kinematics of Patients With Symptomatic Small-Size Supraspinatus Full-Thickness Tears With Healthy Controls.一项比较有症状的小尺寸冈上肌全层撕裂患者与健康对照者的肩部意向性运动学的初步研究。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 21;16(10):e71979. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71979. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Impact of intra-articular injection with tranexamic acid on total blood loss and postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery.
关节内注射氨甲环酸对关节镜下肩袖修复术后总失血量及术后疼痛的影响。
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 23;10:1052039. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1052039. eCollection 2023.
4
Can We Apply Snyder's Arthroscopic Classification to Ultrasound for Evaluating Rotator Cuff Tears? A Comparative Study with MR Arthrography.我们能否将斯奈德关节镜分类法应用于超声来评估肩袖撕裂?与磁共振关节造影的对比研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;13(3):483. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030483.