• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英国,基础胰岛素治疗血糖控制欠佳的2型糖尿病患者中,甘精胰岛素利司那肽与预混胰岛素类似物双时相门冬胰岛素30的成本效益比较

Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK.

作者信息

McCrimmon Rory J, Palmer Karen, Alsaleh Abdul Jabbar Omar, Lew Elisheva, Puttanna Amar

机构信息

Systems Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Sanofi, Reading, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2022 Jun;13(6):1203-1214. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01267-3. Epub 2022 May 11.

DOI:10.1007/s13300-022-01267-3
PMID:35543869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9174356/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

iGlarLixi is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise in addition to metformin (with or without sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) to improve glycemic control in adults with insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D). A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare iGlarLixi with premix biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in people with T2D suboptimally controlled with basal insulin (BI).

METHODS

The IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model was used to estimate lifetime costs and outcomes for people with T2D from a UK health care perspective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000. Initial clinical data were based on the phase 3 randomized, open-label, active-controlled SoliMix clinical trial which compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily iGlarLixi with that of twice-daily BIAsp 30. Costs associated with management and complications and utilities values were derived from published sources. Lifetime costs (in £GBP) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were predicted; extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Estimated QALYs gained were slightly higher with iGlarLixi (8.9 vs. 8.8) compared with premix BIAsp 30, at a higher cost (£23,204 vs. £21,961). The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY was £13,598. Treatment acquisition was the main driver of cost differences (iGlarLixi, £11,750; premix BIAsp 30, £10,395). Costs associated with management and complications were generally similar between comparators.

CONCLUSION

iGlarLixi provides improved QALY outcomes at an acceptable cost compared with premix BIAsp 30, with an ICER below the threshold generally considered acceptable by UK authorities. In people with T2D, iGlarLixi is a simple, cost-effective option for advancing therapy of BI, with fewer daily injections than premix BIAsp 30.

摘要

简介

iGlarLixi被指定作为饮食和运动的辅助手段,联合二甲双胍(加或不加钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂),用于改善2型糖尿病(T2D)控制不佳的成人患者的血糖控制。开展了一项成本效益分析,以比较iGlarLixi与预混双相门冬胰岛素30(BIAsp 30)在基础胰岛素(BI)治疗效果欠佳的T2D患者中的情况。

方法

采用IQVIA核心糖尿病模型,从英国医疗保健角度,以20,000英镑的支付意愿阈值估算T2D患者的终生成本和结局。初始临床数据基于3期随机、开放标签、活性对照的SoliMix临床试验,该试验比较了每日一次iGlarLixi与每日两次BIAsp 30的疗效和安全性。与管理及并发症相关的成本以及效用值均来源于已发表的资料。预测了终生成本(以英镑计)和质量调整生命年(QALY);进行了广泛的情景分析和敏感性分析。

结果

与预混BIAsp 30相比,iGlarLixi获得的估计QALY略高(8.9对8.8),但成本更高(23,204英镑对21,961英镑)。每QALY的基础病例增量成本效益比(ICER)为13,598英镑。治疗费用是成本差异的主要驱动因素(iGlarLixi为11,750英镑;预混BIAsp 30为10,395英镑)。比较组之间与管理及并发症相关的成本总体相似。

结论

与预混BIAsp 30相比,iGlarLixi以可接受的成本提供了更好的QALY结局,ICER低于英国当局通常认为可接受的阈值。在T2D患者中,iGlarLixi是推进BI治疗的一种简单、具有成本效益的选择,每日注射次数比预混BIAsp 30少。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK.在英国,基础胰岛素治疗血糖控制欠佳的2型糖尿病患者中,甘精胰岛素利司那肽与预混胰岛素类似物双时相门冬胰岛素30的成本效益比较
Diabetes Ther. 2022 Jun;13(6):1203-1214. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01267-3. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in People with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the US.在美国,与预混胰岛素类似物BIAsp 30相比,甘精胰岛素利司那肽在基础胰岛素治疗控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中的成本效益。
Diabetes Ther. 2022 Sep;13(9):1659-1670. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01300-5. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
3
Advancing Therapy in Suboptimally Controlled Basal Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: Clinical Outcomes With iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in the SoliMix Randomized Controlled Trial.在基础胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病控制不佳患者中推进治疗:SoliMix随机对照试验中甘精胰岛素利司那肽与预混门冬胰岛素30的临床结局
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jun 28;44(10):2361-70. doi: 10.2337/dc21-0393.
4
Improved patient-reported outcomes with iGlarLixi versus premix BIAsp 30 in people with type 2 diabetes in the SoliMix trial.在 SoliMix 试验中,与预混 BIAsp 30 相比,iGlarLixi 可改善 2 型糖尿病患者的患者报告结局。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Dec;24(12):2364-2372. doi: 10.1111/dom.14822. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
Advancing therapy in people with suboptimally controlled basal insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: Subanalysis of the SoliMix trial in participants in Latin American countries.在基础胰岛素治疗控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中推进治疗:拉丁美洲国家参与者 SoliMix 试验的亚组分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Sep;25(9):2526-2534. doi: 10.1111/dom.15125. Epub 2023 May 30.
6
Advancing therapy with iGlarLixi versus premix BIAsp 30 in basal insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: Design and baseline characteristics of the SoliMix randomized controlled trial.在基础胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病中用 iGlarLixi 推进治疗与预混 BIAsp 30 的比较:SoliMix 随机对照试验的设计和基线特征。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jun;23(6):1221-1231. doi: 10.1111/dom.14354. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Suboptimally Controlled on Basal Insulin Plus Metformin in the UK.在英国,iGlarLixi对基础胰岛素联合二甲双胍治疗控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Dec;12(12):3217-3230. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01159-y. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
8
Hypoglycaemia events with iGlarLixi versus premix biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in people with type 2 diabetes advancing from basal insulin: An analysis of the SoliMix trial.在 2 型糖尿病患者从基础胰岛素转为治疗的 SoliMix 试验中,比较 iGlarLixi 与预混双时相门冬胰岛素 30(BIAsp 30)所致低血糖事件。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Dec;24(12):2391-2399. doi: 10.1111/dom.14825. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus iDegLira in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy.在2型糖尿病患者中,甘精胰岛素利司那肽与德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽对胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和口服降糖治疗控制不佳者的成本效益比较
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Dec;12(12):3231-3241. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01156-1. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
10
Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart from human premix insulin in a US setting.从人预混胰岛素切换至双相门冬胰岛素在美国环境下的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2010;13(2):212-20. doi: 10.3111/13696991003723999.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse drug events in cost-effectiveness models of pharmacological interventions for diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema: a scoping review.糖尿病、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿药物干预成本效益模型中的药物不良事件:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Nov 1;22(11):2194-2266. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00511.
2
Budget Impact Analysis of Intensification with iGlarLixi Compared to Alternative Treatment Strategies Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.与2型糖尿病患者的替代治疗策略相比,iGlarLixi强化治疗的预算影响分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Dec;14(12):2109-2125. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01477-3. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus iDegLira in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy.在2型糖尿病患者中,甘精胰岛素利司那肽与德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽对胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和口服降糖治疗控制不佳者的成本效益比较
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Dec;12(12):3231-3241. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01156-1. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Suboptimally Controlled on Basal Insulin Plus Metformin in the UK.在英国,iGlarLixi对基础胰岛素联合二甲双胍治疗控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Dec;12(12):3217-3230. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01159-y. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
3
Fixed-ratio combinations of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as a promising strategy for treating diabetes.
基础胰岛素与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的固定比例组合作为治疗糖尿病的一种有前景的策略。
World J Diabetes. 2023 Mar 15;14(3):188-197. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i3.188.
The Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin Versus Liraglutide Treatment in People with Type 2 Diabetes and Established Cardiovascular Disease.
恩格列净与利拉鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者的成本效益
Diabetes Ther. 2021 May;12(5):1523-1534. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01040-y. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
4
Advancing therapy with iGlarLixi versus premix BIAsp 30 in basal insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: Design and baseline characteristics of the SoliMix randomized controlled trial.在基础胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病中用 iGlarLixi 推进治疗与预混 BIAsp 30 的比较:SoliMix 随机对照试验的设计和基线特征。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jun;23(6):1221-1231. doi: 10.1111/dom.14354. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
5
Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg Versus Empagliflozin 25 mg for Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the UK Setting.评估在英国背景下,每周一次注射1毫克司美格鲁肽与每日服用25毫克恩格列净治疗2型糖尿病患者的成本效益。
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Feb;12(2):537-555. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00989-6. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
6
Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Empagliflozin Versus Oral Semaglutide, in Addition to Metformin, for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the UK.在英国,恩格列净与口服司美格鲁肽联合二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病的长期成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Sep;11(9):2041-2055. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00883-1. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin in Comparison to Sitagliptin and Saxagliptin Based on Cardiovascular Outcome Trials in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Established Cardiovascular Disease.基于2型糖尿病合并已确诊心血管疾病患者的心血管结局试验,恩格列净与西格列汀和沙格列汀的成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Dec;10(6):2153-2167. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00701-3. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
8
Management of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide, Exenatide ER, Liraglutide and Lixisenatide: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Danish Setting.在丹麦环境下,每周一次司美格鲁肽与度拉鲁肽、艾塞那肽缓释剂、利拉鲁肽和利司那肽治疗2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Aug;10(4):1297-1317. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0630-6. Epub 2019 May 16.
9
Patterns and trends in insulin initiation and intensification among patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Middle East and North Africa region.在中东和北非地区,2 型糖尿病患者胰岛素起始和强化的模式和趋势。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Mar;149:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
10
Basal Insulin Intensification in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Review.2型糖尿病患者基础胰岛素强化治疗:综述
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):877-890. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0395-3. Epub 2018 Mar 24.