• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从人预混胰岛素切换至双相门冬胰岛素在美国环境下的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart from human premix insulin in a US setting.

机构信息

IMS Health, CORE–Center for Outcomes Research GmbH, Gewerbestrasse 25, Allschwil, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2010;13(2):212-20. doi: 10.3111/13696991003723999.

DOI:10.3111/13696991003723999
PMID:20350145
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp 30) from human premix insulin for type 2 diabetes patients in the United States (US) setting.

METHODS

The previously published and validated IMS Core Diabetes Model was used to project life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) and costs over 30 years. Patient characteristics and treatment effects were based on Canadian patients included the IMPROVE observational study (n = 311). Mean glycohaemoglobin (HbA(1c)) was 8.4%, duration of diabetes 16 years and prevalence of complications high at baseline. Simulations were conducted from the perspective of a third-party payer, with costs accounted in 2008 US dollars ($).

RESULTS

BIAsp 30 was projected to improve life expectancy by 0.202 years and QALE by 0.301 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), due to a reduced incidence of most diabetes-related complications. BIAsp 30 was associated with increased lifetime direct medical costs ($76,517 vs. 67,518) and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $29,870 per QALY gained. Long-term outcomes were sensitive to the impact of BIAsp 30 on hypoglycaemia and changes in HbA(1c).

CONCLUSIONS

BIAsp 30 may represent a cost-effective treatment option in the US setting for advanced type 2 diabetes patients experiencing poor glycaemic control or hypoglycaemia on human premix insulin.

LIMITATIONS

The application of treatment effect data derived from a Canadian cohort to the US setting was a limitation of the cost-effectiveness analysis. The findings of this cost-effectiveness analysis are not applicable to insulin-naïve diabetes patients.

摘要

目的

评估将美国(美国)2 型糖尿病患者的人预混胰岛素转换为双相胰岛素类似物(BIAsp30)的成本效益。

方法

使用先前发表和验证的 IMS Core Diabetes Model 来预测 30 年内的预期寿命、质量调整生命预期(QALE)和成本。患者特征和治疗效果基于包括 IMPROVE 观察性研究(n=311)在内的加拿大患者。平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)为 8.4%,糖尿病病程 16 年,基线时并发症高发。模拟从第三方支付者的角度进行,以 2008 年美元($)计算成本。

结果

由于大多数糖尿病相关并发症的发病率降低,BIAsp30 预计将使预期寿命延长 0.202 年,使 QALE 延长 0.301 个质量调整生命年(QALY)。BIAsp30 与终生直接医疗费用增加($76517 比 67518)和每获得一个 QALY 的增量成本效益比为$29870 相关。长期结果对 BIAsp30 对低血糖和 HbA1c 变化的影响敏感。

结论

对于在人预混胰岛素治疗下血糖控制不佳或出现低血糖的晚期 2 型糖尿病患者,BIAsp30 可能代表一种在美国具有成本效益的治疗选择。

局限性

将源自加拿大队列的治疗效果数据应用于美国环境是成本效益分析的一个局限性。本成本效益分析的结果不适用于胰岛素初治糖尿病患者。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart from human premix insulin in a US setting.从人预混胰岛素切换至双相门冬胰岛素在美国环境下的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2010;13(2):212-20. doi: 10.3111/13696991003723999.
2
Cost-effectiveness of switching to biphasic insulin aspart 30 from human insulin in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in South Korea.在韩国,将血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的人胰岛素转换为双相胰岛素类似物门冬胰岛素 30 的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12 Suppl 3:S55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00628.x.
3
Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes patients failing oral agents: cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 vs. insulin glargine in the US.口服降糖药治疗失败的2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素治疗:门冬胰岛素70/30与甘精胰岛素在美国的成本效益比较
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007 Jan;9(1):103-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00581.x.
4
Long-term clinical and cost outcomes of treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 versus insulin glargine in insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients: cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK setting.在初治2型糖尿病患者中,双相门冬胰岛素30/70与甘精胰岛素治疗的长期临床和成本结局:英国背景下的成本效益分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Dec;21(12):2063-71. doi: 10.1185/030079905X74989.
5
Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 vs. insulin glargine in insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients: modelling the long-term health economic implications in a Swedish setting.初治2型糖尿病患者中门冬胰岛素70/30双相胰岛素与甘精胰岛素对比:瑞典背景下长期健康经济影响的建模分析
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Jun;62(6):869-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01766.x.
6
Cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in China.在中国 2 型糖尿病患者中,双相门冬胰岛素与甘精胰岛素的成本效果比较。
Adv Ther. 2010 Nov;27(11):814-27. doi: 10.1007/s12325-010-0078-6. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
7
An analysis of the short- and long-term cost-effectiveness of starting biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naïve people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.对初治2型糖尿病控制不佳患者起始使用门冬胰岛素30的短期和长期成本效益分析。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Nov;106(2):319-27. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.08.024. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of switching from biphasic human insulin 30, insulin glargine, or neutral protamine Hagedorn to biphasic insulin aspart 30 in people with type 2 diabetes.对2型糖尿病患者从双相人胰岛素30、甘精胰岛素或中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素转换为门冬胰岛素30的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2015 Apr;18(4):263-72. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.991791. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
9
Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in type 2 diabetes.系统评价双相门冬胰岛素 30 在 2 型糖尿病中的成本效益。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jun;26(6):1399-412. doi: 10.1185/03007991003689381.
10
Cost effectiveness of insulin glargine plus oral antidiabetes drugs compared with premixed insulin alone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Canada.加拿大 2 型糖尿病患者中甘精胰岛素联合口服抗糖尿病药物与预混胰岛素单独治疗的成本效果比较。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(4):267-80. doi: 10.2165/11535380-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Impact of Intensifying Treatment from Human to Analogue Insulin on Glycaemic Control and Insulin Expenditure in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.评估从人胰岛素强化治疗转换为类似物胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制和胰岛素使用量的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Malays J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;31(2):159-169. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.2.14. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
2
Efficacy, Safety, and Quality of Treatment Satisfaction of Premixed Human and Analogue Insulin Regimens in a Large Cohort of Type 2 Diabetic Patients: PROGENS BENEFIT Observational Study.大型2型糖尿病患者队列中预混人胰岛素和类似物胰岛素治疗方案的疗效、安全性及治疗满意度:PROGENS BENEFIT观察性研究
Int J Endocrinol. 2018 Mar 5;2018:6536178. doi: 10.1155/2018/6536178. eCollection 2018.
3
How Consistent is the Relationship between Improved Glucose Control and Modelled Health Outcomes for People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus? a Systematic Review.2型糖尿病患者血糖控制改善与模拟健康结局之间的关系有多一致?一项系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Mar;35(3):319-329. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0466-0.
4
Systematic Review of the Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Analogues in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.1型和2型糖尿病中胰岛素类似物成本效益的系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Feb;35(2):141-162. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0456-2.
5
Description of a New Predictive Modeling Approach That Correlates the Risk and Associated Cost of Well-Defined Diabetes-Related Complications With Changes in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c).一种新的预测建模方法的描述,该方法将明确界定的糖尿病相关并发症的风险及相关成本与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化相关联。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Mar;11(2):315-323. doi: 10.1177/1932296816662048. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
6
Biphasic insulin Aspart 30 vs. NPH plus regular human insulin in type 2 diabetes patients; a cost-effectiveness study.门冬胰岛素30双相制剂与NPH加普通胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病患者的成本效益研究
BMC Endocr Disord. 2016 Jun 9;16(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12902-016-0116-8.
7
Ten years of experience with biphasic insulin aspart 30: from drug development to the latest clinical findings.双相门冬胰岛素 30 治疗十年:从药物研发到最新临床发现。
Drugs. 2012 Jul 30;72(11):1495-520. doi: 10.2165/11635490-000000000-00000.