Department of Physical Therapy, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Feb 1;37(2):322-327. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004263. Epub 2022 May 9.
Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 322-327, 2023-Although the combination of static stretching (SS) and foam rolling (FR) is frequently used for warm-up in sports, the effect of the intervention order is unclear. This study compared mechanical tissue properties, pain sensitivity, and motor function after SS and FR (with and without vibration) performed in different orders. Our randomized, controlled, crossover experiment included 15 healthy male subjects (22.5 ± 3.3 years) who visited the laboratory 5 times (inactive control condition, FR + SS, FR vibration + SS, SS + FR, and SS + FR vibration ) with an interval of ≥48 hours. In each session, subjects completed three 60-second bouts of FR and SS, targeting the anterior thigh. Pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), maximal voluntary isometric (MVC-ISO), and concentric (MVC-CON) torque, as well as countermovement jump height, were determined before and after the intervention. All interventions significantly ( p < 0.01) increased knee flexion ROM ( d = 0.78, d = 0.87, d = 1.39, and d = 0.87, respectively) while decreasing tissue hardness ( d = -1.25, d = -1.09, d = -1.18, and d = -1.24, respectively). However, MVC-ISO torque was significantly reduced only after FR + SS ( p = 0.05, d = -0.59). Our results suggest that SS should be followed by FR when aiming to increase ROM and reduce tissue hardness without concomitant stretch-induced force deficits (MVC-ISO, MVC-CON, and countermovement jump height). Additionally, adding vibration to FR does not seem to affect the magnitude of changes observed in the examined outcomes.
Nakamura 等人,《静态拉伸和泡沫轴滚动结合或不结合振动对膝关节伸肌运动范围、肌肉性能和组织硬度的综合影响》,《力量与调节研究杂志》37(2):322-327,2023 年。尽管静态拉伸(SS)和泡沫轴滚动(FR)结合在运动前热身中经常使用,但干预顺序的效果尚不清楚。本研究比较了不同顺序进行 SS 和 FR(结合或不结合振动)后机械组织特性、疼痛敏感性和运动功能的变化。我们的随机、对照、交叉实验纳入了 15 名健康男性受试者(22.5±3.3 岁),他们在 5 次访问实验室时(非活动对照条件、FR+SS、FR 振动+SS、SS+FR 和 SS+FR 振动)间隔≥48 小时。在每次实验中,受试者进行了 3 次 60 秒的大腿前侧 FR 和 SS,在干预前后分别测量了压力疼痛阈值、组织硬度、膝关节屈曲运动范围(ROM)、最大自主等长(MVC-ISO)和向心(MVC-CON)扭矩以及反向跳跃高度。所有干预措施均显著增加膝关节屈曲 ROM(d=0.78、d=0.87、d=1.39 和 d=0.87),同时降低组织硬度(d=-1.25、d=-1.09、d=-1.18 和 d=-1.24)。然而,只有在 FR+SS 后 MVC-ISO 扭矩才显著降低(p=0.05,d=-0.59)。我们的结果表明,当旨在增加 ROM 并降低组织硬度而不伴随拉伸引起的力缺陷(MVC-ISO、MVC-CON 和反向跳跃高度)时,SS 应先于 FR。此外,在 FR 中添加振动似乎不会影响所研究结果的变化幅度。