Departamento de Nutrição, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo. Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, Cerqueira César. 01246-904 São Paulo SP Brasil.
Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor. Água Branca SP Brasil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2022 May;27(5):1989-2000. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232022275.08452021. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
Food industries are reformulating their products to lower total sugar and caloric content. Caloric sugars are often substituted by or combined with non-caloric sweeteners. Our study analyzed information about the presence, number and type, and content of different sweeteners displayed on the ingredient list of 10 key ultra-processed products (UPP), from 3 different categories. It also assessed consumers' opinions, perceptions and understanding of caloric and non-caloric sugars used in UPPs using data from 12 focus group discussions. Results indicate a large diversity in sweeteners, frequent use of a combination of multiple caloric and non-caloric sweeteners, often in the same product, and a lack of disclosure of the amounts of non-caloric sweeteners on the nutrition labels. Qualitative analysis reflected the inconsistency of information on nutrition labels and the challenges in compliance with regulations. Participants were unsure about the different types of sweeteners, examples of artificial sweeteners and their potential health consequences. Presenting clearer additive and nutrition information would facilitate consumer comprehension and support healthy food choices.
食品行业正在调整其产品配方,以降低总糖和卡路里含量。通常用无热量甜味剂替代或与无热量甜味剂结合使用热量糖。我们的研究分析了 10 种关键超加工产品 (UPP) 成分列表中不同甜味剂的存在、数量和类型以及含量的信息,这些产品来自 3 个不同类别。它还使用来自 12 个焦点小组讨论的数据评估了消费者对 UPP 中使用的热量和无热量糖的意见、看法和理解。结果表明,甜味剂种类繁多,经常在同一产品中同时使用多种热量和无热量甜味剂的组合,并且营养标签上无热量甜味剂的含量披露不足。定性分析反映了营养标签上信息的不一致性以及遵守法规的挑战。参与者不确定不同类型的甜味剂、人工甜味剂的例子及其潜在的健康后果。提供更清晰的添加剂和营养信息将有助于消费者理解并支持健康的食物选择。