• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查在瑞士前瞻性、基于人群的长期筛查研究中的结直肠癌监测——结果、依从性和成本。

Colorectal cancer surveillance by colonoscopy in a prospective, population-based long-term Swiss screening study - outcomes, adherence, and costs.

机构信息

Kantonsspital Aarau AG, Division of Rheumatology, Aarau, Switzerland.

Division of Gastroenterology, Kantonsspital Uri, Altdorf, Switzerland.

出版信息

Z Gastroenterol. 2022 May;60(5):761-778. doi: 10.1055/a-1796-2471. Epub 2022 May 11.

DOI:10.1055/a-1796-2471
PMID:35545112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9179214/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The success of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening depends mainly on screening quality, patient adherence to surveillance, and costs. Consequently, it is essential to assess the performance over time.

METHODS

In 2000, a closed cohort study on CRC screening in individuals aged 50 to 80 was initiated in Uri, Switzerland. Participants who chose to undergo colonoscopy were followed over 18 years. We investigated the adherence to recommended surveillance and collected baseline characteristics and colonoscopy data. Risk factors at screening for the development of advanced adenomas were analyzed. Costs for screening and follow-up were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

1278 subjects with a screening colonoscopy were included, of which 272 (21.3%; 69.5% men) had adenomas, and 83 (6.5%) had advanced adenomas. Only 59.8% participated in a follow-up colonoscopy, half of them within the recommended time interval. Individuals with advanced adenomas at screening had nearly five times the risk of developing advanced adenomas compared to individuals without adenomas (24.3% vs. 5.0%, OR 4.79 CI 2.30-9.95). Individuals without adenomas developed advanced adenomas in 4.9%, including four cases of CRC; three of them without control colonoscopy. The villous component in adenomas smaller than 10 mm was not an independent risk factor. Costs for screening and follow-up added up to CHF 1'934'521 per 1'000 persons screened, almost half of them for follow-up examinations; 60% of these costs accounted for low-risk individuals.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that follow-up of screening colonoscopy should be reconsidered in Switzerland; in particular, long-term adherence is critical. Costs for follow-up could be substantially reduced by adopting less expensive long-term screening methods for low-risk individuals.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的成功主要取决于筛查质量、患者对监测的依从性和成本。因此,评估其随时间的表现至关重要。

方法

2000 年,在瑞士乌里启动了一项针对 50 至 80 岁人群的 CRC 筛查的封闭队列研究。选择接受结肠镜检查的参与者随访 18 年。我们调查了推荐监测的依从性,并收集了基线特征和结肠镜检查数据。分析了筛查时发生高级腺瘤的风险因素。回顾性评估了筛查和随访的成本。

结果

共纳入 1278 例接受筛查性结肠镜检查的受试者,其中 272 例(21.3%;69.5%为男性)患有腺瘤,83 例(6.5%)患有高级腺瘤。仅有 59.8%的人参加了随访结肠镜检查,其中一半人在推荐的时间间隔内进行。与无腺瘤的人相比,筛查时患有高级腺瘤的人发生高级腺瘤的风险几乎高出五倍(24.3%比 5.0%,OR 4.79,CI 2.30-9.95)。无腺瘤的人发生高级腺瘤的比例为 4.9%,包括 4 例 CRC;其中 3 例无对照结肠镜检查。直径小于 10mm 的腺瘤中绒毛成分不是独立的危险因素。筛查和随访的成本总计为每 1000 人筛查 1934521 瑞士法郎,其中近一半用于随访检查;这些成本的 60%用于低危人群。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,瑞士应重新考虑对筛查性结肠镜检查的随访;特别是,长期的依从性至关重要。通过为低危人群采用更廉价的长期筛查方法,可以大幅降低随访成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bffa/9179214/fcccd432d20f/zfg-0217_10-1055-a-1796-2471-i2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bffa/9179214/00ca88d7ad29/zfg-0217_10-1055-a-1796-2471-i1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bffa/9179214/fcccd432d20f/zfg-0217_10-1055-a-1796-2471-i2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bffa/9179214/00ca88d7ad29/zfg-0217_10-1055-a-1796-2471-i1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bffa/9179214/fcccd432d20f/zfg-0217_10-1055-a-1796-2471-i2.jpg

相似文献

1
Colorectal cancer surveillance by colonoscopy in a prospective, population-based long-term Swiss screening study - outcomes, adherence, and costs.结肠镜检查在瑞士前瞻性、基于人群的长期筛查研究中的结直肠癌监测——结果、依从性和成本。
Z Gastroenterol. 2022 May;60(5):761-778. doi: 10.1055/a-1796-2471. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Baseline Colonoscopy Findings Associated With 10-Year Outcomes in a Screening Cohort Undergoing Colonoscopy Surveillance.基线结肠镜检查结果与结肠镜筛查监测队列中 10 年结局的相关性。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):862-874.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.052. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
3
Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.低风险大肠腺瘤患者结肠镜监测间隔较短的相关因素及其对结局的影响
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun;152(8):1933-1943.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
4
Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after screen-detected adenoma: Experiences from a Danish gFOBT-positive screening cohort.筛查发现腺瘤后结直肠癌的长期风险:来自丹麦粪便潜血试验阳性筛查队列的经验
Int J Cancer. 2020 Aug 15;147(4):940-947. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32850. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
5
Association of Colonoscopy Adenoma Findings With Long-term Colorectal Cancer Incidence.结肠镜检查腺瘤发现与长期结直肠癌发病率的关系。
JAMA. 2018 May 15;319(19):2021-2031. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5809.
6
Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Removal of Adenomas During Screening Colonoscopies.筛查结肠镜检查中切除腺瘤后结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):875-883.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.011. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
7
Intermediate-risk patients with three to four small adenomas should be considered low risk for colorectal cancer screening.对于有 3-4 个小腺瘤的中危患者,应考虑其结直肠癌筛查的风险较低。
Dig Endosc. 2016 May;28(4):450-455. doi: 10.1111/den.12570. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
8
Potential for prevention: a cohort study of colonoscopies and removal of adenomas in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening programme.预防潜力:一项基于粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查及腺瘤切除的队列研究
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;54(8):1008-1014. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1647282. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
9
Contribution of Surveillance Colonoscopy to Colorectal Cancer Prevention.监测结肠镜检查对结直肠癌预防的作用。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Dec;18(13):2937-2944.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.037. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
10
Colonoscopist Performance and Colorectal Cancer Risk After Adenoma Removal to Stratify Surveillance: Two Nationwide Observational Studies.结肠镜检查医生的表现与腺瘤切除后的结直肠癌风险分层监测:两项全国性观察性研究。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Mar;160(4):1067-1074.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs in Switzerland - Quo Vadis?瑞士的有组织结直肠癌筛查项目——何去何从?
Int J Public Health. 2025 Apr 15;70:1608183. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1608183. eCollection 2025.
2
Fecal bacterial biomarkers and blood biochemical indicators as potential key factors in the development of colorectal cancer.粪便细菌生物标志物和血液生化指标作为结直肠癌发生发展的潜在关键因素。
mSystems. 2025 Mar 18;10(3):e0004325. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00043-25. Epub 2025 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Related Mortality After Detection of Low-risk or High-risk Adenomas, Compared With No Adenoma, at Index Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.在索引结肠镜检查中,与无腺瘤相比,低风险或高风险腺瘤检测后结直肠癌和癌症相关死亡率的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2021 May;160(6):1986-1996.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.01.214. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
2
Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020.结肠镜息肉切除术后监测:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南-2020 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2020 Aug;52(8):687-700. doi: 10.1055/a-1185-3109. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
3
Principles for Evaluation of Surveillance After Removal of Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations From the World Endoscopy Organization.
结直肠息肉切除术后监测评估原则:世界内镜组织的建议
Gastroenterology. 2020 May;158(6):1529-1533.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.052. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
4
Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结肠镜检查和息肉切除术后的随访建议:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组的共识更新
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):1131-1153.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.026. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
5
Long-term colorectal cancer incidence after adenoma removal and the effects of surveillance on incidence: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.腺瘤切除后结直肠癌的长期发病率和监测对发病率的影响:一项多中心、回顾性、队列研究。
Gut. 2020 Sep;69(9):1645-1658. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320036. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Surveillance Colonoscopy: Time to Dial it Back?监测结肠镜检查:是时候减少其使用了吗?
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):816-817. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
7
What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?我们需要采取哪些多层次干预措施才能将结直肠癌筛查率提高到 80%?
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Apr;19(4):633-645. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.016. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
8
Optimizing the Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening Worldwide.优化全球结直肠癌筛查质量。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(2):404-417. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.026. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History.基于多基因风险和家族史的大肠癌个体化筛查的成本效益分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Jan;29(1):10-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1123. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
10
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline.粪便免疫化学检测、乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查筛查结直肠癌:临床实践指南。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 2;367:l5515. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5515.