• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响接受专科姑息治疗患者死亡和退出医保地点的因素。

Factors influencing place of death and disenrollment among patients receiving specialist palliative care.

机构信息

Department of biomedicine and prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.

Department of Palliative Care and Pain Therapy Unit, Azienda ULSS n.4 Veneto Orientale, San Donà di Piave, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Biomed. 2022 May 12;93(S2):e2022189. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12637.

DOI:10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12637
PMID:35545986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9534221/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK

Place of death and disenrollment from specialized palliative care services (SPCSs) are two aspects that determine service utilization. These aspects should be determined by patient needs and preferences, but they are often associated to patient sociodemographic or contextual characteristics. The aim of this study was to describe which factors are associated with utilizing SPCSs in terms of place of death and disenrollment.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. Patients (>18 years) who died or were disenrolled during SPCSs utilization. Two hierarchical regression models were performed, and variables were categorized in predisposing, enabling, and need factors according to the Andersen behavioral model of health services use.

RESULTS

We included 35,869 patients (52,5% male, mean age 74,6 ± 12,3 SD), where 17,225 patients died in hospice and 16,953 at home, while 1,691 patients were disenrolled. Dying at home was associated with older age, oncological diagnosis, painful symptoms and longer survival time. Instead, service disenrollment was associated with less education, longer wait time and longer length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

SPCS utilization was not influenced only by patient need, but also by other factors, such as social and contextual factors. These factors need to be considered by health care providers and efforts are needed for 1) identifying barriers and implementing effective interventions to support patients and caregivers in their preferred place of care and death and 2) for avoiding SPCS disenrollment with an increased probability of aggressive treatments and worse quality of life for patients.

摘要

背景与工作目的

死亡地点和退出专门的姑息治疗服务(SPCs)是决定服务利用的两个方面。这些方面应该根据患者的需求和偏好来确定,但它们通常与患者的社会人口统计学或背景特征有关。本研究的目的是描述哪些因素与 SPCs 的利用有关,包括死亡地点和退出服务。

方法

回顾性队列研究。在 SPCs 利用期间死亡或退出的患者(>18 岁)。进行了两次层次回归模型分析,并根据安德森卫生服务利用行为模型,将变量分为倾向因素、促成因素和需要因素。

结果

我们纳入了 35869 名患者(52.5%为男性,平均年龄 74.6±12.3 岁),其中 17225 名患者在临终关怀中死亡,16953 名在家中死亡,1691 名患者退出服务。在家中死亡与年龄较大、肿瘤诊断、疼痛症状和较长的生存时间有关。相反,服务退出与受教育程度较低、等待时间较长和住院时间较长有关。

结论

SPCS 的利用不仅受到患者需求的影响,还受到其他因素的影响,如社会和背景因素。这些因素需要由医疗保健提供者考虑,并需要努力:1)确定障碍并实施有效的干预措施,以支持患者和护理人员在其首选的护理和死亡地点;2)避免 SPCS 退出,因为这会增加患者接受积极治疗的可能性,并降低其生活质量。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing place of death and disenrollment among patients receiving specialist palliative care.影响接受专科姑息治疗患者死亡和退出医保地点的因素。
Acta Biomed. 2022 May 12;93(S2):e2022189. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12637.
2
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.
3
Hospice Care for Patients With Dementia in the United States: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.美国痴呆症患者的临终关怀:一项纵向队列研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jul;19(7):633-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
4
Preferred place of death for patients referred to a specialist palliative care service.转诊至专科姑息治疗服务机构的患者的首选死亡地点。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Sep;5(3):294-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000338. Epub 2013 May 27.
5
Associations of Hospice Disenrollment and Hospitalization With Continuous Home Care Provision.临终关怀退出和住院治疗与持续家庭护理服务的关联。
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55(9):848-855. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000776.
6
Where would Canadians prefer to die? Variation by situational severity, support for family obligations, and age in a national study.加拿大人更愿意在哪里去世?一项全国性研究显示,这取决于情境严重程度、对家庭义务的支持程度和年龄的变化。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Aug 1;21(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01023-1.
7
Hospice assist at home: does the integration of hospice care in primary healthcare support patients to die in their preferred location - A retrospective cross-sectional evaluation study.居家临终关怀:初级医疗保健中临终关怀的整合是否有助于支持患者在其首选地点离世——一项回顾性横断面评估研究。
Palliat Med. 2016 Jun;30(6):580-6. doi: 10.1177/0269216315626353. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
8
Specialist palliative cancer care in acute hospitals and place of death: a population study.急性医院和死亡地点的癌症专科姑息治疗:一项人群研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 May;12(e1):e94-e102. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002232. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
9
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.针对患有晚期疾病的成年人及其护理人员的医院专科姑息治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):CD012780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012780.pub2.
10
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.

引用本文的文献

1
EOLinPLACE: an international research project to reform the way dying places are classified and understood.EOLinPLACE:一项旨在改革临终场所分类和理解方式的国际研究项目。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Feb 12;18:26323524231222498. doi: 10.1177/26323524231222498. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Palliative care organization and staffing models in residential hospices: Which makes the difference?安养院姑息治疗组织和人员配备模式:哪个有影响?
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Feb;126:104135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104135. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
2
Where Do Cancer Patients in Receipt of Home-Based Palliative Care Prefer to Die and What Are the Determinants of a Preference for a Home Death?居家接受姑息治疗的癌症患者愿意在哪里去世,以及影响其选择居家死亡的因素有哪些?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 30;18(1):235. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010235.
3
Perceptions, knowledge and attitudes towards the concept and approach of palliative care amongst caregivers: a cross-sectional survey in Karachi, Pakistan.巴基斯坦卡拉奇 caregivers 对姑息治疗概念和方法的认知、知识和态度:一项横断面调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Nov 26;19(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00688-w.
4
Duration of palliative care before death in international routine practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.国际常规实践中死亡前姑息治疗的持续时间:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 26;18(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01829-x.
5
Place of death for patients treated at a tertiary cancer center in Jordan.约旦一家三级癌症中心治疗的患者的死亡地点。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Apr;29(4):1837-1842. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05677-6. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Place of death associated with types of long-term care services near the end-of-life for home-dwelling older people in Japan: a pooled cross-sectional study.日本居家老年人临终前长期护理服务类型与死亡地点的相关性:一项汇总的横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Aug 9;19(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00622-0.
7
Differences in Utilization of Medical and Dental Services among Homeless People in South Korea.韩国无家可归人群在医疗和牙科服务利用方面的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 23;17(15):5304. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155304.
8
Instability in Preference for Place of Death Among Patients With Symptoms of Advanced Heart Failure.晚期心力衰竭患者对死亡地点偏好的不稳定性。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):349.e29-349.e34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.030. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
9
Geographical Differences in Likelihood of Home Death Among Palliative Cancer Patients: A National Population-based Register Study.姑息治疗癌症患者在家中死亡可能性的地理差异:一项基于全国人口登记的研究
Anticancer Res. 2020 Jul;40(7):3897-3903. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14380.
10
Temporal trends in place of death for end-of-life patients: Evidence from Toronto, Canada.终末期患者死亡地点的时间趋势:来自加拿大多伦多的证据。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Sep;28(5):1807-1816. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13007. Epub 2020 May 4.