Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, (Building 38), 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Dec;48(6):4615-4622. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01987-y. Epub 2022 May 11.
Hospitals involved in the care of severely injured patients treat a varying number of such cases per year. Large hospitals were expected to show a better performance regarding process times in the emergency room. The present investigation analyzed whether this assumption was true, based on a large national trauma registry.
A total of 129,193 severely injured patients admitted primarily to one of 675 German hospitals and documented in the TraumaRegister DGU were considered for this analysis. The analysis covered a 5 years time period (2013-2017). Hospitals were grouped by their average number of annually treated severe trauma patients into five categories ranging from 'less than 10 patients' to '100 or more'. The following process times were compared: pre-hospital time; time from admission to diagnostic procedures (sonography, X-ray, computed tomography), time from admission to selected emergency interventions and time in the emergency room.
Seventy-eight high volume hospitals treated 45% of all patients, while 30% of hospitals treated less than ten cases per year. Injury severity and mortality increased with volume per year. Whole-body computed tomography (WB-CT) was used less frequently in small hospitals (53%) as compared to the large ones (83%). The average time to WB-CT fell from 28 min. in small hospitals to 19 min. in high volume hospitals. There was a linear trend to shorter performance times for all diagnostic procedures (sonography, X-ray, WB-CT) when the annual volume increased. A similar trend was observed for time to blood transfusion (58 min versus 44 min). The median time in the emergency room fell from 74 min to 53 min, but there was no clear trend for the time to the first emergency surgery. Due to longer travel times, prehospital time was about 10 min higher in patients admitted to high volume hospitals compared to patients admitted to smaller local hospitals.
Process times in the emergency room decreased consistently with an increase of patient volume per year. This decrease, however, was associated with a longer prehospital time.
参与严重创伤患者治疗的医院每年会治疗一定数量的此类患者。大型医院在急诊室的处理时间方面有望表现出更好的效果。本研究基于一个大型国家创伤登记处,分析了这一假设是否成立。
共纳入了 129193 名主要收治于德国 675 家医院之一的严重创伤患者,并记录在创伤登记处 DGU 中。该分析涵盖了 5 年的时间(2013-2017 年)。根据每年治疗的严重创伤患者的平均数量,将医院分为五类,范围从“少于 10 例”到“100 例或以上”。比较了以下处理时间:院前时间;从入院到诊断程序(超声、X 光、计算机断层扫描)的时间;从入院到选择的急诊干预的时间;以及在急诊室的时间。
78 家高容量医院治疗了所有患者的 45%,而 30%的医院每年治疗的病例少于 10 例。严重程度和死亡率随每年的容量而增加。全身计算机断层扫描(WB-CT)在小医院(53%)的使用频率低于大医院(83%)。小医院的平均 WB-CT 时间从 28 分钟降至高容量医院的 19 分钟。随着每年容量的增加,所有诊断程序(超声、X 光、WB-CT)的时间都呈线性缩短趋势。对于输血时间(58 分钟对 44 分钟)也观察到了类似的趋势。急诊室的中位数时间从 74 分钟降至 53 分钟,但首次急诊手术的时间没有明显趋势。由于旅行时间较长,与较小的当地医院相比,送往高容量医院的患者的院前时间约长 10 分钟。
随着每年患者人数的增加,急诊室的处理时间持续缩短。然而,这种减少与院前时间的延长有关。