Suppr超能文献

胸腹腔镜食管切除术治疗伴有阻塞性通气障碍的食管鳞癌患者的近期和远期疗效:一项倾向评分匹配研究。

Short- and long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with obstructive ventilatory disorder: a propensity score-matched study.

机构信息

Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8834-8842. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09309-4. Epub 2022 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have obstructive ventilatory disorder (OVD), which is considered a risk factor for postoperative pneumonia. It has been reported that thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (TEP) is less invasive and is associated with fewer postoperative respiratory complications compared with open esophagectomy. This matched-cohort study aimed to elucidate the safety and oncologic outcomes of ESCC patients with OVD who undergo TEP.

METHODS

In this matched-cohort study, 237 patients with ESCC who underwent TEP between 2010 and 2018 were divided into two groups based on forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Based on their propensity scores, 75 patients with normal respiratory function (NRF) and 75 with OVD were selected. The rates of postoperative pneumonia were not significantly different between the two groups (NRF group vs OVD group: 18.7% vs 18.7%; P = 1.000). The rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and anastomotic leakage were also not significantly different (NRF group vs OVD group: 12.0% vs 18.7%, P = 0.365; 18.7% vs 18.7%, P = 1.000). The 5-year OS and DFS rates in the NRF vs OVD groups were 66.2% vs 54.9% and 63.5% vs 52.9%, respectively, with no significant differences (P = 0.421, 0.197).

CONCLUSIONS

TEP can be safely performed on ESCC patients with OVD and can result in an oncological efficiency equal to that of the NRF group.

摘要

背景

许多食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者存在阻塞性通气障碍(OVD),这被认为是术后肺炎的危险因素。有报道称,与开放食管切除术相比,胸腔镜食管切除术(TEP)在俯卧位创伤更小,术后呼吸并发症更少。本匹配队列研究旨在阐明 OVD 患者接受 TEP 的安全性和肿瘤学结果。

方法

在这项匹配队列研究中,根据 1 秒用力呼气量/用力肺活量,将 2010 年至 2018 年间接受 TEP 的 237 例 ESCC 患者分为两组。比较两组患者术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo 分级 II 级或更高)、总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。

结果

根据倾向评分,选择了 75 例呼吸功能正常(NRF)和 75 例 OVD 的患者。两组患者术后肺炎发生率无显著差异(NRF 组 vs OVD 组:18.7% vs 18.7%;P=1.000)。喉返神经麻痹和吻合口漏的发生率也无显著差异(NRF 组 vs OVD 组:12.0% vs 18.7%,P=0.365;18.7% vs 18.7%,P=1.000)。NRF 组与 OVD 组的 5 年 OS 和 DFS 率分别为 66.2%和 54.9%和 63.5%和 52.9%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.421,0.197)。

结论

TEP 可安全用于 OVD 的 ESCC 患者,且肿瘤学效果与 NRF 组相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验