Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
WorldFish, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.
Environ Manage. 2022 Aug;70(2):229-240. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01644-5. Epub 2022 May 12.
To build capacity for addressing complex sustainable development challenges, governments, development agencies, and non-governmental organizations are making substantial investments in governance networks. Yet, enthusiasm for establishing governance networks is not always matched by empirical evidence on their effectiveness. This gap challenges these groups to know whether investing in governance networks is worth their time and effort; a weighing-up that is particularly critical in contexts of limited resources. Through a qualitative case study in Solomon Islands, we evaluate the extent to which a governance network, called the Malaita Provincial Partners for Development, contributed to four dimensions of collaborative governance capacity: individual, relational, organizational, and institutional. We find that the network made moderate contributions to individual, relational and organizational capacity, while institutional capacity remained low despite the presence of the network. Based on these findings, we argue that governance networks are not a panacea. Continued efforts are needed to establish when, how, and in what contexts collaborative networks are effective for building collaborative capacity for sustainable development.
为了应对复杂的可持续发展挑战,各国政府、发展机构和非政府组织正在大力投资治理网络。然而,建立治理网络的热情并不总是与其实效的经验证据相匹配。这一差距使得这些组织不得不考虑投资治理网络是否值得他们花费时间和精力;在资源有限的情况下,这种权衡尤为关键。通过在所罗门群岛的一项定性案例研究,我们评估了一个名为“马莱塔省发展伙伴关系”的治理网络在多大程度上促进了四个方面的合作治理能力:个人、关系、组织和制度。我们发现,该网络对个人、关系和组织能力的贡献适中,而尽管存在网络,制度能力仍然较低。基于这些发现,我们认为治理网络并不是万能的。需要继续努力,确定在何时、如何以及在何种情况下合作网络对建设可持续发展的合作能力是有效的。