Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2022 May 13;15(2):167-179.
Titanium bases are used frequently in daily practice for bonding to CAD/CAM abutments or crowns. Due to intimate contact between the adhesive gap of the titanium-base abutment and the peri-implant bone, the physical and chemical characteristics of the bonding material, or the gap itself, may affect peri-implant inflammatory reactions. The present study therefore aimed to examine the long-term effects of individualised abutments bonded to titanium bases on peri-implant health.
A total of 24 patients, each with one test and one control abutment, participated in the present prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. The test abutments were CAD/CAM titanium abutments bonded to titanium bases. As the control abutments were individualised, one-piece CAD/CAM titanium abutments were used. Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed at abutment insertion and then on a yearly basis over the following 5 years.
No significant differences in marginal bone level were observed between the titanium-base and one-piece abutments at any of the follow-up time points; however, when intragroup marginal bone levels were compared to the baseline values, significant differences were found at several follow-up time points. Intergroup differences were only found to be significant for pocket depth at the 4- (P = 0.006) and 5-year follow-ups (P = 0.024), favouring titanium-base abutments.
Within the limitations of the present study, it appears that the peri-implant tissues of this specific patient cohort responded to titanium-base abutments in a rather similar manner to one-piece abutments over a 5-year period; however, no definitive conclusions can be drawn due to the low power of the present study.
钛基在日常临床实践中经常用于与 CAD/CAM 基台或牙冠粘结。由于钛基基台的粘结间隙与种植体周围骨之间的紧密接触,粘结材料的物理和化学特性、间隙本身可能会影响种植体周围炎症反应。因此,本研究旨在检查粘结到钛基上的个体化基台对种植体周围健康的长期影响。
本前瞻性、单盲、随机对照临床试验共纳入 24 名患者,每名患者各有一个测试基台和一个对照基台。测试基台为粘结到钛基上的 CAD/CAM 钛基台。而对照基台为个体化的、整体式 CAD/CAM 钛基台。在基台植入时以及随后的 5 年内,每年评估临床和影像学参数。
在任何随访时间点,钛基和整体式基台的边缘骨水平均无显著差异;然而,与基线值相比,在几个随访时间点发现了内组边缘骨水平的显著差异。仅在第 4 年(P=0.006)和第 5 年随访时(P=0.024)发现了组间差异,在这些时间点,钛基基台的探诊深度更小。
在本研究的限制范围内,似乎该特定患者群体的种植体周围组织在 5 年内对钛基基台的反应与整体式基台相当相似;然而,由于本研究的效力较低,因此无法得出明确的结论。