• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据肾功能分层的冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中减量比伐卢定的疗效与安全性(REDUCE BOLUS):一项单盲、分层随机、非劣效性试验

Efficacy and Safety of the Reduced Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Stratified by Renal Function (REDUCE BOLUS): A Single-Blind, Stratified Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial.

作者信息

Hu Qiang, Han Ya-Ling, Zhou Tie-Nan, Wang Xiao-Zeng, Zhang Quan-Yu

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.

Department of Cardiology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 25;9:864048. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.864048. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.864048
PMID:35548446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9081606/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, some cases indicated that the loading dose of bivalirudin increased the bleeding risk, particularly in patients with renal insufficiency. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the low-dose (80%) bolus injection of bivalirudin in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization stratified by renal function.

METHODS

A total of 204 individuals in the REDUCE BOLUS trial were stratified 1:1 to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 ml/min cohort or eGFR < 60 ml/min cohort, then randomized 1:1 to the reduced bolus bivalirudin group (i.e., the experimental group) or normal bolus bivalirudin group (i.e., the control group), respectively. The primary end point was to compare the differences of the area under the curve of activated clotting time (ACT) between the two groups. The secondary end points were the postoperative net adverse clinical events (NACEs) before discharge, defined as the all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, stroke, and bleeding events.

RESULTS

Between January 3, 2020, and March 26, 2021, 204 patients undergoing coronary angiography were randomly assigned, including 102 (i.e., 51 in the control group and 51 in the experimental group) with normal eGFR and 102 (i.e., 51 control and 51 experimental) with abnormal eGFR. No difference was observed in the curve of ACT between the control group and the experimental group (0.55 ± 0.09 vs. 0.56 ± 0.08, = 0.542 and 0.55 ± 0.06 vs. 0.57 ± 0.05, = 0.075, respectively, for normal eGFR cohort and abnormal eGFR cohort). The one-sided 97.5% lower confidence bound for the difference in the area under the ACT curve was -0.017 and 0.0015 in eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min and eGFR<60 ml/min cohort, respectively, both above the preset non-inferiority criterion of -0.07, establishing the non-inferiority. There was no incidence of NACE and stent thrombosis before discharge in each group.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, the efficacy and safety of the reduced bolus of bivalirudin were non-inferior to the normal one, even in patients without chronic kidney disease.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

[www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03588611].

摘要

背景

在临床实践中,一些病例表明比伐卢定的负荷剂量会增加出血风险,尤其是在肾功能不全的患者中。因此,本研究旨在评估按肾功能分层的接受心脏导管插入术患者中低剂量(80%)推注比伐卢定的疗效和安全性。

方法

REDUCE BOLUS试验中的204名个体按1:1比例分层至估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)≥60 ml/min队列或eGFR<60 ml/min队列,然后分别按1:1比例随机分配至减量推注比伐卢定组(即试验组)或常规推注比伐卢定组(即对照组)。主要终点是比较两组活化凝血时间(ACT)曲线下面积的差异。次要终点是出院前术后净不良临床事件(NACEs),定义为全因死亡率、复发性心肌梗死、缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建、中风和出血事件。

结果

在2020年1月3日至2021年3月26日期间,204名接受冠状动脉造影的患者被随机分配,其中eGFR正常的有102名(即对照组51名,试验组51名),eGFR异常的有102名(即对照组51名,试验组51名)。对照组和试验组之间在ACT曲线上未观察到差异(eGFR正常队列中分别为0.55±0.09对0.56±0.08,P = 0.542;eGFR异常队列中分别为0.55±0.06对0.57±0.05,P = 0.075)。ACT曲线下面积差异的单侧97.5%置信下限在eGFR≥60 ml/min和eGFR<60 ml/min队列中分别为-0.017和0.0015,均高于预设的非劣效性标准-0.07,确立了非劣效性。每组出院前均无NACE和支架血栓形成事件发生。

结论

在接受心脏导管插入术的患者中,减量推注比伐卢定的疗效和安全性不劣于常规推注,即使在无慢性肾脏病的患者中也是如此。

临床试验注册

[www.ClinicalTrials.gov],标识符[NCT03588611]

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/bacd417832da/fcvm-09-864048-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/b91c6d504768/fcvm-09-864048-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/e6fc3257362f/fcvm-09-864048-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/2d716cbc7430/fcvm-09-864048-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/1811b88f2042/fcvm-09-864048-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/e2398b6be107/fcvm-09-864048-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/bacd417832da/fcvm-09-864048-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/b91c6d504768/fcvm-09-864048-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/e6fc3257362f/fcvm-09-864048-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/2d716cbc7430/fcvm-09-864048-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/1811b88f2042/fcvm-09-864048-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/e2398b6be107/fcvm-09-864048-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5022/9081606/bacd417832da/fcvm-09-864048-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of the Reduced Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Stratified by Renal Function (REDUCE BOLUS): A Single-Blind, Stratified Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial.根据肾功能分层的冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中减量比伐卢定的疗效与安全性(REDUCE BOLUS):一项单盲、分层随机、非劣效性试验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 25;9:864048. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.864048. eCollection 2022.
2
Bivalirudin versus heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel pretreatment: pooled analysis from the ACUITY and ISAR-REACT 4 trials.比伐卢定与肝素加糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂在经氯吡格雷预处理行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:来自 ACUITY 和 ISAR-REACT 4 试验的汇总分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(5):705-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.972869. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
3
Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉入路与股动脉入路和比伐卢定与普通肝素的比较(MATRIX):一项多中心、随机对照试验的最终 1 年结果。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):835-848. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31714-8. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
4
Bivalirudin vs heparin with or without tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: the BRIGHT randomized clinical trial.比伐卢定与肝素联合或不联合替罗非班用于急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 BRIGHT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Apr 7;313(13):1336-46. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.2323.
5
Bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial.比伐卢定用于急性心肌梗死直接血管成形术患者(HORIZONS-AMI):一项随机对照试验的1年结果
Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1149-59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61484-7. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
6
Comparison of safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Anti-Thrombotic Strategy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bivalirudin vs Heparin study).比较高危患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时比伐卢定与普通肝素的安全性和疗效(来自经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中抗血栓策略减少心肌损伤-比伐卢定与肝素研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Aug 15;110(4):478-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.017. Epub 2012 May 12.
7
Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention in high-bleeding-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome in contemporary practice.比伐卢定与普通肝素在急性冠脉综合征高危出血风险患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2020 Oct;130:110758. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110758. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Bivalirudin During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Total Occlusion: A Retrospective Study.替罗非班在慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的疗效及安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Ther. 2021 May;43(5):844-851. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
9
Clinical Outcomes of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in Elderly Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中高龄患者使用比伐卢定与肝素的临床结局:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020 Feb;34(1):101-111. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-06937-7.
10
Bivalirudin in percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: A single-center pilot study.比伐卢定用于慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项单中心试点研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):679-685. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27181. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduced-dose of bivalirudin (without the post-procedure infusion) in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征患者择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用低剂量比伐卢定(不进行术后输注)。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):713. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04399-5.
2
Bivalirudin vs. heparin on a background of ticagrelor and aspirin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A multicenter prospective cohort study.替格瑞洛和阿司匹林联用背景下,比伐卢定与肝素用于ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多中心前瞻性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 28;9:932054. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.932054. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 369 种疾病和伤害导致的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
2
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.2019年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征诊断和管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
3
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation Analysis of CTB-001, a Recently Developed Generic of Bivalirudin.
新型依替巴肽 CTB-001 的药代动力学和药效学建模与模拟分析
Pharm Res. 2019 Aug 8;36(10):146. doi: 10.1007/s11095-019-2676-6.
4
Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉入路与股动脉入路和比伐卢定与普通肝素的比较(MATRIX):一项多中心、随机对照试验的最终 1 年结果。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):835-848. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31714-8. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
5
Bivalirudin versus heparin with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.比伐卢定与普通肝素用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
Activated Clotting Time to Guide Heparin Dosing in Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Treated With IIb/IIIa Inhibitors: Impact on Ischemic and Bleeding Outcomes: Insights From the TAO Trial.激活凝血时间指导接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和使用 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂的非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的肝素剂量:对缺血和出血结局的影响:来自 TAO 试验的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;11(6):e006084. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006084.
7
Association Between Maximal Activated Clotting Time and Major Bleeding Complications During Transradial and Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经桡动脉和股动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时最大激活凝血时间与大出血并发症的关系。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun 11;11(11):1036-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.257. Epub 2018 May 16.
8
Anticoagulant Use Among Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.终末期肾病患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时的抗凝药物使用:来自国家心血管数据登记库的分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb;11(2):e005628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005628.
9
Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in coronary artery disease patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease: Meta-analysis.比伐卢定在轻至中度慢性肾脏病冠心病患者中的疗效和安全性:荟萃分析
J Cardiol. 2018 May;71(5):494-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
10
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.