Stien R, Nordal H J, Oftedal S I, Slettebø M
Acta Neurol Scand. 1987 Mar;75(3):190-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1987.tb07916.x.
The anti-spastic effect of a new drug, tizanidine, was compared with that of baclofen in a double-blind clinical trial; 40 seriously handicapped patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) were randomly allocated treatment with one or the other drug for a 6-week period. The antispastic effect was evaluated by clinical criteria. The optimal daily dose of both drugs varied considerably from patient to patient, and was on the average 23 mg for Tizanidin and 59 mg for baclofen. To the extent an antispastic effect was observed, the 2 drugs appeared to be equally effective when given at a 1:2 ratio (mg tizanidine: mg baclofen). Side effects of both drugs were sleepiness, muscular weakness and dry mouth. Tizanidine had a mild depressive effect on blood pressure. Sudden withdrawal of both drugs was accompanied by a transient relative increase of spasticity in approximately half the patients. There were no other changes suggesting physical or psychological dependence. The present study underscores that neither baclofen nor tizanidine are ideal antispastic drugs, and emphasize the need for further research.
在一项双盲临床试验中,将一种新药替扎尼定的抗痉挛作用与巴氯芬的抗痉挛作用进行了比较;40名患有多发性硬化症(MS)的严重残疾患者被随机分配接受其中一种药物治疗,为期6周。通过临床标准评估抗痉挛效果。两种药物的最佳日剂量在不同患者之间差异很大,替扎尼定平均为23毫克,巴氯芬平均为59毫克。在观察到抗痉挛效果的程度上,当以1:2的比例(毫克替扎尼定:毫克巴氯芬)给药时,两种药物似乎同样有效。两种药物的副作用均为嗜睡、肌肉无力和口干。替扎尼定对血压有轻度抑制作用。突然停用两种药物后,约一半患者会出现痉挛的短暂相对增加。没有其他表明身体或心理依赖的变化。本研究强调,巴氯芬和替扎尼定都不是理想的抗痉挛药物,并强调需要进一步研究。