Suppr超能文献

二维剪切波弹性成像检测肝硬度诊断临床显著门脉高压的准确性:一项荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of liver stiffness on two-dimensional shear wave elastography for detecting clinically significant portal hypertension: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.

Department of Endocrinology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023 Feb;20(2):141-149. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2077642. Epub 2022 May 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) has recently been proposed to detect clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), we aimed to perform a meta-analysis based on the published data to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 2D-SWE for detecting CSPH.

METHOD

Literature databases were searched up until 1 August 2021. The summary area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the summary sensitivity and specificity were used to examine the accuracy of 2D-SWE for evaluating CSPH. Heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression.

RESULTS

Finally 9 studies with 956 patients were included in this study for evaluation and meta-analysis. 2D-SWE showed good diagnostic performance for detecting CSPH with a summary sensitivity of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76%-88%) and summary specificity of 78% (95% CI: 65%-87%); the summary AUROC was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90). Summary positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR, and DOR of 2D-SWE for detecting CSPH were 3.7 (95% CI: 2.4-5.9), 0.22 (95% CI: 0.16-0.30), and 17 (95% CI: 10-29), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

2D-SWE showed good performance in diagnosing CSPH and can be considered as an important and noninvasive adjunctive approach in the management of patients with CSPH.

摘要

目的

二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)最近被提出用于检测临床显著门静脉高压(CSPH),我们旨在基于已发表的数据进行荟萃分析,以评估 2D-SWE 检测 CSPH 的诊断准确性。

方法

检索文献数据库至 2021 年 8 月 1 日。使用汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、汇总诊断优势比(DOR)和汇总敏感性和特异性来评估 2D-SWE 评估 CSPH 的准确性。使用荟萃回归探索异质性。

结果

最终有 9 项研究共 956 名患者纳入本研究进行评估和荟萃分析。2D-SWE 对检测 CSPH 具有良好的诊断性能,汇总敏感性为 83%(95%可信区间:76%-88%),汇总特异性为 78%(95%可信区间:65%-87%);汇总 AUROC 为 0.88(95%可信区间:0.84-0.90)。2D-SWE 检测 CSPH 的汇总阳性似然比(LR)、阴性 LR 和 DOR 分别为 3.7(95%可信区间:2.4-5.9)、0.22(95%可信区间:0.16-0.30)和 17(95%可信区间:10-29)。

结论

2D-SWE 在诊断 CSPH 方面表现良好,可以被认为是 CSPH 患者管理中的一种重要的非侵入性辅助方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验