*Luis Antezana and Katherine Xie are equally contributed to this paper.
Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Telemed Telecare. 2024 May;30(4):739-746. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221095319. Epub 2022 May 12.
We examined the suitability of using a video visit platform to perform postoperative parotidectomy evaluation at a tertiary care, multiple-surgeon otolaryngology center.
A retrospective case review was conducted of patients who underwent parotidectomy and postoperative video visits between November 2019 and December 2020. Success of video visit, plan if applicable, and post-visit outcomes were reviewed. Video visits were designated as successful if the physician could assess for complications in the postoperative course (e.g. first bite pain, Frey syndrome, ear numbness, unplanned visits to the emergency department, unplanned return to the operating room), perform examination of facial nerve function, and formulate care recommendations per clinical judgement without deferment of recommendations for a subsequent in-person visit.
There were 96 postoperative video visits with 91 unique parotidectomy patients. Demographics: 28/63 male/female; average age, 54y. All video visits were suitable for successful postoperative parotidectomy patient evaluation. Eight visits (8.3%) consisted of patients presenting with common postoperative complications (e.g. eye dryness, first bite pain) and warranted care recommendations. In only two cases did the patient require further in-person procedural (hematoma evacuation, seroma aspiration) follow-ups. For the other 91.7% of visits (n = 88), no additional recommendations were required as patients experienced uncomplicated postoperative courses. Of all the patients, 26.1% (n = 23) were instructed to follow-up for routine surveillance. All other patients, 73.9% (n = 65) were instructed to follow-up as needed.
Postoperative parotidectomy evaluation is highly amenable to being performed by video. A telemedicine option offers convenience for patients in the majority of cases without compromising clinical assessment and judgment for the physician.
我们考察了在一家多外科医生耳鼻喉科中心的三级护理环境中,使用视频访问平台对腮腺切除术患者进行术后评估的适用性。
对 2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受腮腺切除术和术后视频访问的患者进行了回顾性病例研究。评估了视频访问的成功率、如果适用的计划以及访问后的结果。如果医生能够评估术后过程中的并发症(例如初次咀嚼疼痛、弗雷综合征、耳部麻木、急诊就诊、非计划返回手术室)、对面神经功能进行检查并根据临床判断制定护理建议,而无需推迟后续的当面就诊,则认为视频访问是成功的。
共有 96 次术后视频访问和 91 例独特的腮腺切除术患者。人口统计学特征:28/63 例男性/女性;平均年龄 54 岁。所有视频访问均适合成功评估腮腺切除术后患者。8 次(8.3%)访问由出现常见术后并发症(例如眼干、初次咀嚼疼痛)的患者组成,需要护理建议。只有两例患者需要进一步进行面对面的程序性(血肿清除、血清肿抽吸)随访。对于其他 91.7%的访问(n=88),患者术后过程无并发症,无需进一步建议。在所有患者中,26.1%(n=23)被指示进行常规随访。所有其他患者,73.9%(n=65)被指示按需随访。
腮腺切除术的术后评估非常适合通过视频进行。在大多数情况下,远程医疗选择为患者提供了便利,而不会影响医生的临床评估和判断。