Kirby Institute, UNSW, Level 6, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Australian Human Rights Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 12;22(1):953. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13339-x.
In response to the threat of COVID-19 infection, Australia mandated a 14 day quarantine period in a designated facility for all travellers returning from overseas from late March 2020. These facilities were usually hotels, or hotel-like serviced apartments, and also included a repurposed former mining village in the Northern Territory. This paper aimed to investigate the experiences of risk of people quarantined in designated supervised facilities in Australia, which has not been systematically explored before.
In this qualitative study semi-structured interviews were conducted with 58 participants quarantined between March 2020 and January 2021. Participants were returned Australian citizens and residents who were required to undergo mandatory supervised quarantine for COVID-19. Interviews were conducted using video teleconferencing (via Zoom), transcribed and coded, then analysed thematically.
While participants generally supported the concept of quarantine to protect the Australian public, they were critical of elements of it where they felt exposed to risk (COVID-related or not). They also described instances where infection control within the system seemed inadequate. For some, particularly those quarantined with small children, they reported that the facilities were inadequate or inappropriate for health and wellbeing. Using thematic analysis, three major themes were identified that related to problems in the existing system: perception of being subjected to high risk through lax standards of COVID protection in the quarantine process; risks to the community identified in quarantine; and risk in non-hotel managed quarantine facilities.
There are systemic issues with infection control in hotel quarantine, which can be further undermined by individual non-compliance. Risks to safety for those in quarantine can be reduced, both in terms of infection control within hotel quarantine and, in the case of the Northern Territory facility, timely in-person medical care as needed for non-COVID conditions. Systems of infection control need ongoing review to ensure that people entering quarantine are protected from known risks of infection at every stage. Medical services in quarantine facilities should be examined to ensure timely and appropriate non-COVID medical services are available.
为应对 COVID-19 感染的威胁,澳大利亚自 2020 年 3 月底起要求所有从海外返回的旅行者在指定设施接受 14 天的隔离。这些设施通常是酒店或类似酒店服务的公寓,也包括北领地一个重新利用的前采矿村。本文旨在调查在澳大利亚指定监督设施中接受隔离的人的风险体验,这在以前尚未系统地探讨过。
在这项定性研究中,对 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 1 月期间接受强制性监督隔离的 58 名参与者进行了半结构化访谈。参与者是返回澳大利亚的公民和居民,他们因 COVID-19 而被要求接受强制性监督隔离。访谈通过视频电话会议(通过 Zoom)进行,转录并编码,然后进行主题分析。
虽然参与者普遍支持隔离以保护澳大利亚公众的概念,但他们对他们认为面临风险(与 COVID 相关或不相关)的隔离的某些方面提出了批评。他们还描述了在系统内感染控制似乎不足的情况。对于一些人,特别是那些与小孩一起隔离的人,他们报告说,设施不适合健康和福利。通过主题分析,确定了与现有系统问题相关的三个主要主题:隔离过程中 COVID 保护标准松懈而导致的被视为高风险的感知;隔离中发现的对社区的风险;以及非酒店管理的隔离设施中的风险。
酒店隔离中的感染控制存在系统性问题,个别不遵守规定可能会进一步破坏这些问题。可以通过在酒店隔离内加强感染控制,并在北领地设施的情况下,及时提供非 COVID 条件所需的亲自医疗服务,来降低隔离人员的安全风险。感染控制系统需要不断审查,以确保进入隔离的人员在每个阶段都受到已知感染风险的保护。隔离设施中的医疗服务应进行检查,以确保及时提供适当的非 COVID 医疗服务。