• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同步放化疗治疗宫颈癌患者的预处理鳞状细胞癌抗原水平的预后意义,以及调强放疗和容积旋转调强放疗的剂量学结果和临床毒性比较。

The prognostic significance of pretreatment squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in cervical cancer patients treated by concurrent chemoradiation therapy and a comparison of dosimetric outcomes and clinical toxicities between tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2022 May 12;17(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02063-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13014-022-02063-w
PMID:35549962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9097430/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To analyze the prognostic factors associated with stage IB-IVA cervical cancer in patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) and to compare the clinical toxicities and dosimetric parameters of organs at risk between the different radiotherapy techniques.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 93 patients with stage IB-IVA cervical cancer who underwent definitive CCRT between April 2009 and December 2017. Nine patients (9.7%) received 3DCRT, 43 patients (46.2%) underwent VMAT, and 41 patients (44.1%) received tomotherapy, and all of them followed by brachytherapy using a 2D planning technique. The treatment outcomes and related prognostic factors were analyzed. We also compared the clinical toxicities and dosimetric parameters between the different techniques used for the last 30 patients.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 52.0 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) were analyzed. In a Cox proportional hazards regression model, pretreatment SCC Ag > 10 ng/mL was a significant prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-4.70; P = 0.041), LRRFS (HR, 3.48; 95% CI 1.07-11.26; P = 0.038), and DMFS (HR 2.80; 95% CI 1.02-7.67; P = 0.045). Increasing the rectal volume receiving a radiation dose exceeding 30 Gy (V of rectum; odds ratio [OR] 1.15; 95% CI 1.10-1.30; P = 0.03) was associated with a higher possibility of ≥ Grade 2 acute radiation therapy (RT)-related diarrhea. The median rectal V values were 56.4%, 97.5%, and 86.5% for tomotherapy, 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), respectively (P < 0.001). In addition, the chance of experiencing ≥ Grade 2 acute diarrhea were 10.0%, 66.7%, and 54.5% for tomotherapy, 3DCRT, and VMAT, respectively (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with pretreatment SCC Ag ≤ 10 ng/mL have better PFS, LRRFS, and DMFS than those with pretreatment SCC Ag > 10 ng/mL. The rectal V is a significant predictor of severe acute diarrhea. Tomotherapy significantly decreased the rectal V, reducing the severity of acute RT-related diarrhea during external beam RT. Trial registration This study was approved by the institutional review board at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital. The registration number is KMUHIRB-E(I)-20190054 and retrospectively registered on 2019/3.

摘要

背景

分析接受同期放化疗(CCRT)的 IB-IVA 期宫颈癌患者的预后因素,并比较不同放疗技术的危及器官临床毒性和剂量学参数。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2009 年 4 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受根治性 CCRT 的 93 例 IB-IVA 期宫颈癌患者。9 例(9.7%)患者接受 3DCRT,43 例(46.2%)接受 VMAT,41 例(44.1%)接受调强放疗,所有患者均采用二维计划技术进行后装放疗。分析治疗结果和相关的预后因素。我们还比较了最后 30 例患者中不同技术的临床毒性和剂量学参数。

结果

中位随访 52.0 个月,分析了 5 年总生存率(OS)、无进展生存率(PFS)、局部区域无复发生存率(LRRFS)和远处转移无复发生存率(DMFS)。在 Cox 比例风险回归模型中,治疗前 SCC Ag >10ng/mL 是 PFS(风险比[HR]2.20;95%置信区间[CI]1.03-4.70;P=0.041)、LRRFS(HR,3.48;95%CI 1.07-11.26;P=0.038)和 DMFS(HR 2.80;95%CI 1.02-7.67;P=0.045)的显著预后因素。直肠接受超过 30Gy 剂量的直肠体积(V of rectum)增加(比值比[OR]1.15;95%CI 1.10-1.30;P=0.03)与≥2 级急性放疗(RT)相关腹泻的可能性更高有关。调强放疗、三维适形放疗(3DCRT)和容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)的直肠 V 值中位数分别为 56.4%、97.5%和 86.5%(P<0.001)。此外,调强放疗、3DCRT 和 VMAT 发生≥2 级急性腹泻的概率分别为 10.0%、66.7%和 54.5%(P=0.029)。

结论

治疗前 SCC Ag ≤10ng/mL 的患者比治疗前 SCC Ag >10ng/mL 的患者有更好的 PFS、LRRFS 和 DMFS。直肠 V 是严重急性腹泻的重要预测因子。调强放疗显著降低了直肠 V,降低了外照射放疗期间急性 RT 相关腹泻的严重程度。

试验注册

本研究得到高雄医学大学附设中和纪念医院机构审查委员会的批准。注册号为 KMUHIRB-E(I)-20190054,并于 2019 年 3 月 20 日进行了回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/8d59ce36d79b/13014_2022_2063_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/57d9aa111f8a/13014_2022_2063_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/3a17c10b6f65/13014_2022_2063_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/2d118659d9c2/13014_2022_2063_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/30e18ae875da/13014_2022_2063_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/1679b21b28f6/13014_2022_2063_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/8d59ce36d79b/13014_2022_2063_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/57d9aa111f8a/13014_2022_2063_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/3a17c10b6f65/13014_2022_2063_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/2d118659d9c2/13014_2022_2063_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/30e18ae875da/13014_2022_2063_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/1679b21b28f6/13014_2022_2063_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f0/9097430/8d59ce36d79b/13014_2022_2063_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The prognostic significance of pretreatment squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in cervical cancer patients treated by concurrent chemoradiation therapy and a comparison of dosimetric outcomes and clinical toxicities between tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy.同步放化疗治疗宫颈癌患者的预处理鳞状细胞癌抗原水平的预后意义,以及调强放疗和容积旋转调强放疗的剂量学结果和临床毒性比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 May 12;17(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02063-w.
2
Prognostic value of pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen after definitive radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.根治性放疗联合或不联合同期化疗治疗宫颈鳞癌患者,治疗前癌胚抗原的预后价值。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):1105-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.011. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
3
Comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of cervical esophageal carcinoma.三维适形放射治疗、调强放射治疗和容积调强弧形治疗在颈段食管癌治疗中的比较。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Feb 1;30(2):1-8. doi: 10.1111/dote.12497.
4
Pretreatment Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen (SCC-Ag) as a Predictive Factor for the Use of Consolidation Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer Patients After Postoperative Extended-Field Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.术后扩大野同步放化疗后,鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)作为宫颈癌患者巩固化疗应用的预测因素。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:15330338211044626. doi: 10.1177/15330338211044626.
5
Pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen level is a risk factor for para-aortic lymph node recurrence in addition to squamous cell carcinoma antigen following definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.治疗前癌胚抗原水平是子宫颈鳞癌根治性同期放化疗后除鳞状细胞癌抗原外导致腹主动脉旁淋巴结复发的一个危险因素。
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan 30;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-13.
6
The prognostic factors for locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy.接受调强放疗同步化疗的局部晚期宫颈癌患者的预后因素。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Mar;114(3):231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.10.021. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
7
Prognostic value of post-radiation serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen and primary tumor regression for cervical squamous cell carcinoma.放疗后血清鳞状细胞癌抗原和原发肿瘤退缩对宫颈鳞状细胞癌的预后价值。
Cancer Biomark. 2020;29(3):327-335. doi: 10.3233/CBM-190934.
8
Outcome and toxicity of radical radiotherapy or concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for elderly cervical cancer women.老年宫颈癌女性接受根治性放疗或同步放化疗的疗效与毒性
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3503-2.
9
Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and helical tomotherapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients.三维适形放疗、容积调强弧形放疗和螺旋断层放疗用于胃癌术后患者的剂量学比较
Jpn J Radiol. 2018 Jan;36(1):30-39. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0696-x. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
[Outcomes and prognostic factors of distant metastasis in patients with advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy].[同步放化疗治疗晚期宫颈鳞状细胞癌患者远处转移的结局及预后因素]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Feb;50(2):125-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Dosimetric comparison and prognostic analysis of helical tomotherapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.局部晚期宫颈癌螺旋断层放疗与调强放射治疗的剂量学比较及预后分析
Oncol Lett. 2025 Jun 12;30(2):396. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.15142. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Organoid technology in cervical cancer research.宫颈癌研究中的类器官技术。
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 May 15;15(5):1988-2003. doi: 10.62347/FNTD1712. eCollection 2025.
3
The impact of bladder volume on dosimetric outcomes in VMAT for cervical cancer patients after surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Rectal Dose Is the Other Dosimetric Factor in Addition to Small Bowel for Prediction of Acute Diarrhea during Postoperative Whole-Pelvic Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Gynecologic Patients.在妇科患者术后全盆腔调强放疗期间,直肠剂量是除小肠之外用于预测急性腹泻的另一个剂量学因素。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 28;13(3):497. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030497.
2
Xerostomia and Clinical Outcomes in Definitive Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis.口干症与头颈部鳞癌调强放疗(IMRT)、三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)临床结局的关系:Meta 分析
In Vivo. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):623-629. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11816.
3
膀胱容积对宫颈癌术后患者容积调强放疗剂量学结果的影响。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Jul;36(4):e65. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e65. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
4
The impact of different clinicopathologic factors and salvage therapies on cervical cancer patients with isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence.不同临床病理因素及挽救性治疗对孤立性主动脉旁淋巴结复发的宫颈癌患者的影响。
Discov Oncol. 2024 Mar 1;15(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s12672-023-00825-w.
5
Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy to enhance bladder and bowel.调强放疗和容积旋转调强放疗对膀胱和肠道的剂量学比较。
J Med Life. 2023 Sep;16(9):1381-1387. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0317.
6
A prognostic model using FIGO 2018 staging and MRI-derived tumor volume to predict long-term outcomes in patients with uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma who received definitive radiotherapy.基于 FIGO 2018 分期和 MRI 测量肿瘤体积的预后模型预测接受根治性放疗的子宫颈鳞癌患者的长期结局。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul 21;21(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03116-4.
7
Mechanisms of FLASH effect.FLASH效应的机制。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 23;12:995612. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.995612. eCollection 2022.
Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis.
2018 年宫颈癌发病率和死亡率的估计:全球分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
4
Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status.治疗前淋巴结转移作为宫颈癌的预后意义:疾病状态之间的比较。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;52(2):516-523. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.328. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
5
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for definitive treatment of cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.调强放疗根治宫颈癌的Meta 分析
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Sep 14;13(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1126-7.
6
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for head and neck cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis.调强放射治疗(IMRT)与三维适形放射治疗(3D-CRT)用于头颈癌的成本效益分析
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2018 Apr;64(4):318-323. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.64.04.318.
7
The Efficacy and Late Toxicities of Computed Tomography-based Brachytherapy with Intracavitary and Interstitial Technique in Advanced Cervical Cancer.基于计算机断层扫描的近距离放射治疗联合腔内及组织间插植技术在晚期宫颈癌中的疗效及晚期毒性反应
J Cancer. 2018 Apr 18;9(9):1635-1641. doi: 10.7150/jca.23974. eCollection 2018.
8
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy versus Fixed-Field Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Radical Irradiation for Cervical Cancer without Lymphadenectasis: Dosimetric and Clinical Results.容积旋转调强弧形治疗与固定野调强放疗在无淋巴结转移宫颈癌根治性放疗中的剂量学和临床结果比较。
Oncol Res Treat. 2018;41(3):105-109. doi: 10.1159/000484608. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
9
Impact of para-aortic recurrence risk-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer with positive pelvic lymph nodes.盆腔淋巴结阳性的局部晚期宫颈癌基于腹主动脉旁复发风险指导的调强放疗的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Feb;148(2):291-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.003.
10
Bone Marrow-sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Cisplatin For Stage IB-IVA Cervical Cancer: An International Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial (INTERTECC-2).保骨髓强度调制放疗同步顺铂治疗 IB-IVA 期宫颈癌的国际多中心 II 期临床试验(INTERTECC-2)。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Mar 1;97(3):536-545. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Nov 23.