Rathore Roshita, Tucker Carole A, Jeka John J, Wright W Geoffrey, Hurt Christopher P
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Dec;103(12):2303-2310. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 May 10.
To compare the scaling of the postural stability variables between older nonfallers and fallers during gait initiation (GI) while stepping over increasing obstacle distances.
Cross-sectional study.
University research laboratory.
A sample of participants (N=24) divided into 2 groups: older nonfallers (n=12) and older fallers (n=12). Participants had no known neurologic, musculoskeletal, or cardiovascular conditions that could have affected their walking, and all were independent walkers. All the participants had an adequate cognitive function to participate as indicated by a score of more than 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination.
Not applicable.
The primary dependent variables were peak anterior-posterior (AP) center of mass (CoM)-center of pressure (CoP) separation during anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), AP CoM-CoP separation at the toe-off, and peak AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing. Secondary dependent variables were AP trunk angle during GI. Within- and between-repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare means between groups across different task conditions for all the dependent variables.
There was a main effect of group for peak AP CoM-CoP separation during APA (P=.018), an interaction effect between group and condition for AP CoM-CoP separation at toe-off (P=.009), and a main effect of condition for peak AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing (P<.001). We also found a main effect of group for peak AP trunk angle during the swing (P=.028).
For GI while stepping over increasing obstacle distances, older fallers adopt a more conservative strategy of AP CoM-CoP separation than nonfallers prior to toe-off and demonstrate increased peak AP trunk lean during the swing. AP CoM-CoP separation prior to toe-off during the GI task may be a critical marker to identify fallers and warrants additional investigation.
比较老年人中未跌倒者和跌倒者在步态起始(GI)过程中跨越不同障碍物距离时姿势稳定性变量的变化情况。
横断面研究。
大学研究实验室。
选取24名参与者作为样本,分为两组:老年未跌倒者(n = 12)和老年跌倒者(n = 12)。参与者无已知的可能影响其行走的神经、肌肉骨骼或心血管疾病,均为独立行走者。所有参与者的简易精神状态检查表得分均超过24分,表明具有足够的认知功能参与研究。
不适用。
主要因变量包括预期姿势调整(APA)期间前后(AP)方向的质心(CoM)-压力中心(CoP)分离峰值、离地时的AP CoM-CoP分离以及摆动期间的AP CoM-CoP分离峰值。次要因变量为GI期间的AP躯干角度。采用组内和组间重复测量方差分析比较所有因变量在不同任务条件下组间的均值。
APA期间AP CoM-CoP分离峰值存在组间主效应(P = 0.018),离地时AP CoM-CoP分离存在组与条件的交互效应(P = 0.009),摆动期间AP CoM-CoP分离峰值存在条件主效应(P < 0.001)。我们还发现摆动期间AP躯干角度峰值存在组间主效应(P = 0.028)。
在跨越不同障碍物距离的GI过程中,老年跌倒者在离地前采用比未跌倒者更保守的AP CoM-CoP分离策略,且在摆动期间AP躯干倾斜峰值增加。GI任务中离地前的AP CoM-CoP分离可能是识别跌倒者的关键指标,值得进一步研究。