Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Oct;31(10):2011-2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.03.027. Epub 2022 May 10.
The relationship between contraction strength of the flexor-pronator muscles (FPMs) and elbow valgus braking function has not been clarified.
HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in medial elbow joint space when there is a difference in contraction strength of FPMs under elbow valgus stress.
Subjects were 20 healthy male university students, and the elbow joint on the nondominant hand side was used for measurements. The body position for limb measurement was sitting in a chair, with the shoulder abducted 60° and in 90° of external rotation, with 90° of elbow flexion. At first, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the FPMs by grip motion was measured using a hand grip dynamometer under 60-N valgus stress. Contraction strengths of 10% MVC, 30% MVC, and 50% MVC were used. Ultrasonographic images of the medial elbow joint space (JS) were taken in the starting limb position. Using the Telos device system, load was then gradually increased by +10 N/s, and at the time of 60-N valgus stress, an image of the JS was taken. Furthermore, the subject adjusted to the set contraction strength (for about 5 sec) with 60-N valgus stress applied, and an image of the JS was taken while maintaining the set contraction strength. Each MVC condition (10% MVC, 30% MVC, and 50% MVC) was performed randomly. Three ultrasonographic images were taken within 10 seconds, and the average value of the three images was adopted as the JS.
Compared with the JS under 60-N valgus stress, the JS was significantly reduced under 60-N valgus stress + 50% MVC. No significant difference was observed between the starting limb position and 60-N valgus stress + 50% MVC.
FPMs may require muscle activity ≥50% MVC to brake 60-N elbow valgus stress.
屈肌-旋前肌(FPM)收缩力与肘外翻制动功能之间的关系尚未明确。
假设/目的:本研究旨在探讨在肘外翻应力下 FPM 收缩力存在差异时,内侧肘关节间隙的变化。
研究对象为 20 名健康的男性大学生,使用非优势手的肘部进行测量。肢体测量的体位为坐在椅子上,肩部外展 60°,外旋 90°,肘部弯曲 90°。首先,在手握测力器下,在 60-N 外翻应力下测量握力运动的 FPM 最大自主收缩(MVC)。使用 10% MVC、30% MVC 和 50% MVC 的收缩强度。在起始肢体位置拍摄内侧肘关节间隙(JS)的超声图像。使用 Telos 设备系统,以+10 N/s 的速度逐渐增加负荷,当达到 60-N 外翻应力时,拍摄 JS 图像。此外,受试者在施加 60-N 外翻应力的情况下,将关节调整至设定的收缩强度(约 5 秒),并在保持设定的收缩强度的情况下拍摄 JS 图像。每个 MVC 条件(10% MVC、30% MVC 和 50% MVC)均随机进行。在 10 秒内拍摄 3 张超声图像,取 3 张图像的平均值作为 JS。
与 60-N 外翻应力下的 JS 相比,60-N 外翻应力+50% MVC 下的 JS 显著减小。起始肢体位置与 60-N 外翻应力+50% MVC 之间无显著差异。
FPM 可能需要≥50% MVC 的肌肉活动来制动 60-N 的肘外翻应力。