Pendse Ruchita S, El Ayadi Alison M, Sharma Preetika, Ahuja Alka, Hosapatna Basavarajappa Darshan, Duggal Mona, Kankaria Ankita, Singh Pushpendra, Kumar Vijay, Bagga Rashmi, Diamond-Smith Nadia G
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 12;6(5):e34852. doi: 10.2196/34852.
As mobile phone uptake in India continues to grow, there is also continued interest in mobile platform-based interventions for health education. There is a significant gender gap in mobile phone access-women's access to mobile phones is constrained by economic and social barriers. Pregnancy and postpartum care is one of many targets for mobile health (mHealth) interventions that particularly rely upon women's access to and facility with mobile phone use.
We aimed to describe the dynamics and patterns of married pregnant and postpartum women's mobile phone access and use (among both phone owners and nonowners) who participated in an mHealth postpartum care intervention and to identify potential barriers to their participation in mobile platform-based interventions.
A secondary analysis was performed on mixed methods data obtained for a pilot mHealth intervention for postpartum care of mothers in rural Punjab from July 2020 to February 2021. Two formative sources included exploratory in-depth interviews among postpartum women (n=20; 1-3 months postpartum) and quantitative maternal health survey among women who were pregnant or who had recently given birth (n=102). We also utilized mixed methods intervention assessment data from early postpartum women who participated in the pilot intervention (n=29), including intervention moderator perspectives. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed, and pertinent findings were grouped thematically.
The majority of women owned a phone (maternal health survey: 75/102, 74%; demographic survey: 17/29, 59%), though approximately half (53/102, 52%) still reported sharing phones with other family members. Sharing a phone with female family members typically allowed for better access than sharing with male family members. Some households had strict preferences against daughters-in-law having phones, or otherwise significantly restricted women's phone access. Others reported concerns about phone use-related health hazards for mother and infant during the pregnancy or postpartum period.
These findings suggest nuance regarding what is meant by women's phone ownership and access-there were numerous additional constraints on women's use of phones, particularly during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Future research and mHealth interventions should probe these domains to better understand the dynamics governing women's access, use, and fluency with mobile phones to optimally design mHealth interventions.
随着印度手机使用率持续增长,基于移动平台的健康教育干预措施也不断受到关注。在手机使用方面存在显著的性别差距——女性使用手机受到经济和社会障碍的限制。孕期和产后护理是移动健康(mHealth)干预措施的众多目标之一,这类干预措施尤其依赖女性使用手机的机会和能力。
我们旨在描述参与移动健康产后护理干预的已婚孕妇和产后妇女(包括手机拥有者和非拥有者)手机使用情况的动态变化和模式,并确定她们参与基于移动平台干预措施的潜在障碍。
对2020年7月至2021年2月在旁遮普邦农村地区进行的一项针对母亲产后护理的移动健康试点干预所获得的混合方法数据进行二次分析。两个形成性来源包括对产后妇女(n = 20;产后1 - 3个月)的探索性深入访谈,以及对怀孕或刚分娩妇女的孕产妇健康定量调查(n = 102)。我们还利用了参与试点干预的产后早期妇女的混合方法干预评估数据(n = 29),包括干预主持人的观点。进行了定性和定量分析,并对相关结果进行了主题分组。
大多数女性拥有手机(孕产妇健康调查:75/102,74%;人口统计调查:17/29,59%),不过约一半(53/102,52%)仍报告与其他家庭成员共用手机。与女性家庭成员共用手机通常比与男性家庭成员共用能获得更好的使用机会。一些家庭坚决反对儿媳拥有手机,或以其他方式严重限制女性使用手机。其他人则报告担心孕期或产后母亲和婴儿使用手机会带来健康危害。
这些发现表明,女性手机拥有和使用情况的含义存在细微差别——女性使用手机存在诸多额外限制,尤其是在孕期和产后。未来的研究和移动健康干预措施应深入探究这些领域,以更好地理解影响女性使用手机的机会、能力和流畅程度的动态因素,从而优化移动健康干预措施的设计。