Brand Jordan, Ani Lidia, Rankin Kelsey A, McLaughlin William M, Joo Peter Y, Li Don T, Riedel Matthew, Leslie Michael
From the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct 15;30(20):979-983. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01178. Epub 2022 May 10.
Arthroplasty has become the standard of care for displaced femoral neck fractures in the geriatric cohort. However, details regarding optimal implant design and fixation strategy continue to be debated. We sought to determine whether cemented or press-fit hemiarthroplasties were more advantageous in terms of revision surgery, contralateral hip fractures, hospital length of stay, mortality rates, and survival.
All geriatric fragility hip fractures at a level 1 trauma center (2014 to 2019) were retrospectively reviewed for the fracture pattern, fixation methodology, and outcome, yielding 707 femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty (309 cemented and 398 press fit). The final follow-up was either date of death or final encounter. Major end points were revision surgery, contralateral fracture, and death. A Z-score test of two proportions was used for dichotomous variables, and a two-tailed t -test was used for continuous variables. Cox proportional hazard was used for revision surgery-free survival between groups, adjusting for age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists status.
Patients who underwent press-fit hemiarthroplasty had a significantly higher rate of revision surgery (7.8% vs 3.9%; P = 0.006). Press-fit cases had a trend toward a decreased risk of contralateral fracture (13% vs 9.8%; P = 0.12), although this did not reach significance. Both groups had similar length of stay ( P = 0.08) and death rates ( P = 0.39). Of those who died, there was a trend toward longer survival in patients who received a press-fit hemiarthroplasty (413 vs 615 days; P < 0.001). There was a trend toward longer survival without repeat surgery in the cemented group without reaching significance (hazard ratio, 0.66 [0.34 to 1.23]; P = 0.201).
In this study, we found a markedly longer survival time after press-fit hemiarthroplasty, which we believe reflects surgeons' tendencies to cement the femoral prosthesis in patients with more comorbidities. However, press-fit hemiarthroplasties were more likely to result in repeat procedures on the same hip. Displaced geriatric femoral neck fractures may benefit from a cemented rather than press-fit hemiarthroplasty.
关节置换术已成为老年人群移位型股骨颈骨折的标准治疗方法。然而,关于最佳植入物设计和固定策略的细节仍存在争议。我们试图确定骨水泥型或压配型半髋关节置换术在翻修手术、对侧髋部骨折、住院时间、死亡率和生存率方面是否更具优势。
对一家一级创伤中心(2014年至2019年)所有老年脆性髋部骨折患者的骨折类型、固定方法和结果进行回顾性研究,共纳入707例接受半髋关节置换术的股骨颈骨折患者(309例骨水泥型和398例压配型)。最终随访时间为死亡日期或最后一次就诊日期。主要终点为翻修手术、对侧骨折和死亡。对二分变量采用两个比例的Z检验,对连续变量采用双尾t检验。采用Cox比例风险模型比较两组无翻修手术的生存率,并对年龄、性别和美国麻醉医师协会分级进行校正。
接受压配型半髋关节置换术的患者翻修手术率显著更高(7.8%对3.9%;P = 0.006)。压配型病例对侧骨折风险有降低趋势(13%对9.8%;P = 0.12),但未达到统计学意义。两组住院时间(P = 0.08)和死亡率(P = 0.39)相似。在死亡患者中,接受压配型半髋关节置换术的患者生存时间有延长趋势(413天对615天;P < 0.001)。骨水泥型组无再次手术的生存时间有延长趋势,但未达到统计学意义(风险比,0.66 [0.34至1.23];P = 0.201)。
在本研究中,我们发现压配型半髋关节置换术后生存时间明显更长,我们认为这反映了外科医生倾向于对合并症较多的患者使用骨水泥固定股骨假体。然而,压配型半髋关节置换术更有可能导致同一髋关节的再次手术。移位型老年股骨颈骨折可能受益于骨水泥型而非压配型半髋关节置换术。