Suppr超能文献

心房颤动与射血分数保留的心力衰竭之间不同左心房重塑的见解

Insights on Distinct Left Atrial Remodeling Between Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

作者信息

Kuo Jen-Yuan, Jin Xuanyi, Sun Jing-Yi, Chang Sheng-Hsiung, Chi Po-Ching, Sung Kuo-Tzu, Mok Greta S P, Yun Chun-Ho, Chang Shun-Chuan, Chung Fa-Po, Yu Ching-Hsiang, Wu Tung-Hsin, Hung Chung-Lieh, Yeh Hung-I, Lam Carolyn S P

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 26;9:857360. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.857360. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist with overlapping pathophysiology like left atrial (LA) remodeling, which might differ given different underlying mechanisms.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the different patterns of LA wall remodeling in AF vs. HFpEF.

METHODS

We compared LA wall characteristics including wall volume (LAWV), wall thickness (LAWT), and wall thickness heterogeneity (LAWT[SD]) and LA structure, function among the controls (without AF or HFpEF, = 115), HFpEF alone ( = 59), AF alone ( = 37), and HFpEF+AF ( = 38) groups using multi-detector computed tomography and echocardiography.

RESULTS

LA wall remodeling was most predominant and peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) was worst in HFpEF+AF patients as compared to the rest. Despite lower E/e' (9.8 ± 3.8 vs. 13.4 ± 6.4) yet comparable LA volume, LAWT and PALS in AF alone vs. HFpEF alone, LAWV [12.6 (11.6-15.3) vs. 12.0 (10.2-13.7); = 0.01] and LAWT(SD) [0.68 (0.61-0.71) vs. 0.60 (0.56-0.65); < 0.001] were significantly greater in AF alone vs. HFpEF alone even after multi-variate adjustment and propensity matching. After excluding the HFpEF+AF group, both LAWV and LAWT [SD] provided incremental values when added to PALS or LAVi (all p for net reclassification improvement <0.05) in discriminating AF alone, with LAWT[SD] yielding the largest C-statistic (0.78, 95% CI: 0.70-0.86) among all LA wall indices.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a similar extent of LA enlargement and dysfunction in HFpEF vs. AF alone, larger LAWV and LAWT [SD] can distinguish AF from HFpEF alone, suggesting the distinct underlying pathophysiological mechanism of LA remodeling in AF vs. HFpEF.

摘要

背景

射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)和心房颤动(AF)常并存,具有重叠的病理生理学特征,如左心房(LA)重塑,但其潜在机制不同,可能存在差异。

目的

我们旨在研究AF与HFpEF患者左心房壁重塑的不同模式。

方法

我们使用多排螺旋计算机断层扫描和超声心动图,比较了对照组(无AF或HFpEF,n = 115)、单纯HFpEF组(n = 59)、单纯AF组(n = 37)和HFpEF+AF组(n = 38)的左心房壁特征,包括壁容积(LAWV)、壁厚度(LAWT)和壁厚度异质性(LAWT[SD])以及左心房结构和功能。

结果

与其他组相比,HFpEF+AF患者的左心房壁重塑最为显著,心房纵向应变峰值(PALS)最差。尽管单纯AF组与单纯HFpEF组相比E/e'较低(9.8±3.8对13.4±6.4),但左心房容积、LAWT和PALS相当,但即使经过多变量调整和倾向匹配后,单纯AF组的LAWV[12.6(11.6 - 15.3)对12.0(10.2 - 13.7);p = 0.01]和LAWT(SD)[0.68(0.61 - 0.71)对0.60(0.56 - 0.65);p < 0.001]仍显著大于单纯HFpEF组。排除HFpEF+AF组后,在鉴别单纯AF时,LAWV和LAWT[SD]加入PALS或LAVi后均提供了增量值(所有净重新分类改善的p值<0.05),其中LAWT[SD]在所有左心房壁指标中产生的C统计量最大(0.78,95%CI:0.70 - 0.86)。

结论

尽管单纯HFpEF与单纯AF患者左心房扩大和功能障碍的程度相似,但较大的LAWV和LAWT[SD]可将AF与单纯HFpEF区分开来,提示AF与HFpEF患者左心房重塑的潜在病理生理机制不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b55d/9086706/aeca896a9031/fcvm-09-857360-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验