• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国队列与监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中食管癌预后因素的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparison of prognostic factors of esophageal cancer between a Chinese cohort and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Hu Bin, Zhu Yiyao, Wu Xiaobo

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Apr;13(2):527-538. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-145.

DOI:10.21037/jgo-22-145
PMID:35557583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9086052/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive, early metastasis gastrointestinal malignancy, with geographic differences in prognosis. It is unknown whether there are differences in the survival in different regions among esophageal cancer patients who underwent the treatments. This study was to explore the influencing factors of esophageal cancer survival in patients from China and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort study were conducted with 605 Chinese esophageal cancer patients in the Wuxi People's Hospital and 2,351 patients from the SEER database. The demographic and clinical data were collected from the two cohort, respectively. The outcome was the death during the follow-up. The follow-up ended on November 30, 2021. The Cox proportional hazards model was used in the univariate and multivariate survival analyses, with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

In group one, the following were identified as the prognostic factors: female gender (HR =0.568; 95% CI: 0.398-0.811), T3 and T4 stages (HR =3.312; 95% CI: 2.493-4.401), N2 and N3 stages (HR =3.562; 95% CI: 2.631-4.824), and other subtypes of cancer (HR =0.393; 95% CI: 0.223-0.693). The following prognostic were factors identified in group two: age ≥65 years (HR =1.16; 95% CI: 1.058-1.276), female gender (HR =0.843; 95% CI: 0.752-0.945), T3 and T4 stages (HR =1.523; 95% CI: 1.373-1.690), M1 stage (HR =2.554; 95% CI: 2.303-2.832), treatment with surgery and chemotherapy (HR =0.507; 95% CI: 0.457-0.562), and other subtypes of cancer (HR =1.432; 95% CI: 1.298-1.581).

CONCLUSIONS

There may be some differences in prognostic factors between Chinese and American patients with esophageal cancer. It is indicated that different management strategies of esophageal cancer should be considered in different populations to improve the prognosis of patients.

摘要

背景

食管癌是一种侵袭性很强、早期易转移的胃肠道恶性肿瘤,预后存在地域差异。对于接受治疗的食管癌患者,不同地区的生存率是否存在差异尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨来自中国的食管癌患者以及监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中患者食管癌生存的影响因素。

方法

对无锡市人民医院的605例中国食管癌患者和SEER数据库中的2351例患者进行回顾性队列研究。分别从两个队列中收集人口统计学和临床数据。观察结果为随访期间的死亡情况。随访于2021年11月30日结束。在单因素和多因素生存分析中使用Cox比例风险模型,计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在第一组中,确定的预后因素如下:女性(HR =0.568;95%CI:0.398 - 0.811)、T3和T4期(HR =3.312;95%CI:2.493 - 4.401)、N2和N3期(HR =3.562;95%CI:2.631 - 4.824)以及其他癌症亚型(HR =0.393;95%CI:0.223 - 0.693)。在第二组中确定的预后因素如下:年龄≥65岁(HR =1.16;95%CI:1.058 - 1.276)、女性(HR =0.843;95%CI:0.752 - 0.945)、T3和T4期(HR =1.523;95%CI:1.373 - 1.690)、M1期(HR =2.554;95%CI:2.303 - 2.832)、接受手术和化疗(HR =0.507;95%CI:0.457 - 0.562)以及其他癌症亚型(HR =1.432;95%CI:1.298 - 1.581)。

结论

中国和美国食管癌患者的预后因素可能存在一些差异。这表明应针对不同人群考虑不同的食管癌管理策略,以改善患者的预后。

相似文献

1
Comparison of prognostic factors of esophageal cancer between a Chinese cohort and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database: a retrospective cohort study.中国队列与监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中食管癌预后因素的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Apr;13(2):527-538. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-145.
2
A Competing Risk Analysis Study of Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma 2006-2015 Using Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.2006-2015 年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中食管癌患者预后的竞争风险分析研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jan 22;26:e918686. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918686.
3
Development and validation of a prognostic predictive model of pulmonary spindle cell carcinoma from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results database.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的肺梭形细胞癌预后预测模型的开发与验证
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Aug;11(8):2783-2794. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-427.
4
Survival and prognostic factors for postoperative primary appendiceal cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.原发性阑尾癌术后的生存及预后因素:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的回顾性队列研究
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(3):1433-1443. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-454.
5
A retrospective comparative cohort study of SEER database analysis of the prognostic value of breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in patients with multifocal multicenter breast cancer.一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析的回顾性比较队列研究,探讨保乳手术和乳房切除术对多灶多中心乳腺癌患者的预后价值。
Gland Surg. 2023 Feb 28;12(2):165-182. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-682. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
6
The prognosis of patients with small cell carcinoma of the cervix: a retrospective study of the SEER database and a Chinese multicentre registry.宫颈小细胞癌患者的预后:SEER 数据库和中国多中心登记处的回顾性研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jun;24(6):701-708. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00185-7.
7
Focus on patients with early esophageal cancer-a prognostic nomogram.关注早期食管癌患者——一种预后列线图
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Dec;9(12):7469-7478. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-1645.
8
Treatment of clinical T4 stage superior sulcus non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.临床 T4 期上沟非小细胞肺癌的治疗:监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的倾向匹配分析。
Biosci Rep. 2019 Feb 1;39(2). doi: 10.1042/BSR20181545. Print 2019 Feb 28.
9
The prognostic performance of the log odds of positive lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A population study of the US SEER database and a Chinese single-institution cohort.食管鳞癌患者阳性淋巴结对数优势比的预后性能:美国 SEER 数据库的人群研究和中国单机构队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2021 Sep;10(17):6149-6164. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4120. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
10
Competing risk of the specific mortality among Asian-American patients with prostate cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis.亚裔美国前列腺癌患者特定死亡率的竞争风险:监测、流行病学和最终结果分析。
BMC Urol. 2022 Mar 24;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-00992-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Downregulation of SMAD2 and SMAD4 is associated with poor prognosis and shorter survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.SMAD2和SMAD4的下调与食管鳞状细胞癌的不良预后和较短生存期相关。
Mol Biol Rep. 2025 Mar 3;52(1):274. doi: 10.1007/s11033-025-10390-w.
2
A predictive model for advanced esophageal cancer involving the lower third of the esophagus.一种针对累及食管下三分之一的晚期食管癌的预测模型。
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Dec 31;13(12):6661-6674. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-1116. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
3
The Japanese Esophageal Society classification for prediction of superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia invasion depth: Validation in a Western population.日本食管学会分类预测表在西方人群中预测食管黏膜鳞状细胞癌浸润深度的验证
United European Gastroenterol J. 2024 Oct;12(8):1069-1080. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12601. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
4
Expression of Interleukin-8, Interleukin-12 and Interleukin-13 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Biomarker Potentiality and Prognostic Significance.白细胞介素-8、白细胞介素-12 和白细胞介素-13 在食管鳞状细胞癌中的表达:生物标志物潜力和预后意义。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Sep;55(3):1239-1255. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01063-1. Epub 2024 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer incidence, mortality, and burden in China: a time-trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020.中国癌症发病率、死亡率和疾病负担的变化趋势分析:基于 2020 年全球公布的流行病学数据与美国和英国的比较
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021 Oct;41(10):1037-1048. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12197. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
2
Survival benefit of perioperative chemotherapy for T1-3N0M0 stage esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis.T1-3N0M0期食管癌围手术期化疗的生存获益:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Feb;13(2):995-1004. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2877.
3
Tumor Size as a Critical Prognostic Factor in T1-2 Stage Esophageal Cancer.肿瘤大小作为T1-2期食管癌的关键预后因素
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020 Aug 17;2020:2796943. doi: 10.1155/2020/2796943. eCollection 2020.
4
Specific DNA methylation markers in the diagnosis and prognosis of esophageal cancer.特定DNA甲基化标记物在食管癌诊断和预后中的作用
Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Dec 13;11(23):11640-11658. doi: 10.18632/aging.102569.
5
Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer.食管癌多学科综合治疗的新进展。
Surg Today. 2020 Jan;50(1):12-20. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01878-7. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
6
Tumor Volume Index as a Prognostic Factor in Patients after Curative Esophageal Cancer Resection.肿瘤体积指数作为食管癌根治术后患者的预后因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1909-1915. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07308-9. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
7
Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: Comparison between a Chinese cohort and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data.食管原发性小细胞癌:中国队列与监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据的比较。
Cancer Med. 2019 Mar;8(3):1074-1085. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2001. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
8
Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods.估算 2018 年全球癌症发病率和死亡率:GLOBOCAN 来源和方法。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
9
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin and S-1 for Resectable Advanced Esophageal Cancer.多西他赛、顺铂和S-1新辅助化疗用于可切除的进展期食管癌
Anticancer Res. 2018 Sep;38(9):5267-5273. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12852.
10
Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、地区和国家按年龄、性别划分的 264 种死因的死亡率:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1151-1210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9.