文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

中国队列与监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中食管癌预后因素的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparison of prognostic factors of esophageal cancer between a Chinese cohort and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Hu Bin, Zhu Yiyao, Wu Xiaobo

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Apr;13(2):527-538. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-145.


DOI:10.21037/jgo-22-145
PMID:35557583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9086052/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive, early metastasis gastrointestinal malignancy, with geographic differences in prognosis. It is unknown whether there are differences in the survival in different regions among esophageal cancer patients who underwent the treatments. This study was to explore the influencing factors of esophageal cancer survival in patients from China and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study were conducted with 605 Chinese esophageal cancer patients in the Wuxi People's Hospital and 2,351 patients from the SEER database. The demographic and clinical data were collected from the two cohort, respectively. The outcome was the death during the follow-up. The follow-up ended on November 30, 2021. The Cox proportional hazards model was used in the univariate and multivariate survival analyses, with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: In group one, the following were identified as the prognostic factors: female gender (HR =0.568; 95% CI: 0.398-0.811), T3 and T4 stages (HR =3.312; 95% CI: 2.493-4.401), N2 and N3 stages (HR =3.562; 95% CI: 2.631-4.824), and other subtypes of cancer (HR =0.393; 95% CI: 0.223-0.693). The following prognostic were factors identified in group two: age ≥65 years (HR =1.16; 95% CI: 1.058-1.276), female gender (HR =0.843; 95% CI: 0.752-0.945), T3 and T4 stages (HR =1.523; 95% CI: 1.373-1.690), M1 stage (HR =2.554; 95% CI: 2.303-2.832), treatment with surgery and chemotherapy (HR =0.507; 95% CI: 0.457-0.562), and other subtypes of cancer (HR =1.432; 95% CI: 1.298-1.581). CONCLUSIONS: There may be some differences in prognostic factors between Chinese and American patients with esophageal cancer. It is indicated that different management strategies of esophageal cancer should be considered in different populations to improve the prognosis of patients.

摘要

背景:食管癌是一种侵袭性很强、早期易转移的胃肠道恶性肿瘤,预后存在地域差异。对于接受治疗的食管癌患者,不同地区的生存率是否存在差异尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨来自中国的食管癌患者以及监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中患者食管癌生存的影响因素。 方法:对无锡市人民医院的605例中国食管癌患者和SEER数据库中的2351例患者进行回顾性队列研究。分别从两个队列中收集人口统计学和临床数据。观察结果为随访期间的死亡情况。随访于2021年11月30日结束。在单因素和多因素生存分析中使用Cox比例风险模型,计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。 结果:在第一组中,确定的预后因素如下:女性(HR =0.568;95%CI:0.398 - 0.811)、T3和T4期(HR =3.312;95%CI:2.493 - 4.401)、N2和N3期(HR =3.562;95%CI:2.631 - 4.824)以及其他癌症亚型(HR =0.393;95%CI:0.223 - 0.693)。在第二组中确定的预后因素如下:年龄≥65岁(HR =1.16;95%CI:1.058 - 1.276)、女性(HR =0.843;95%CI:0.752 - 0.945)、T3和T4期(HR =1.523;95%CI:1.373 - 1.690)、M1期(HR =2.554;95%CI:2.303 - 2.832)、接受手术和化疗(HR =0.507;95%CI:0.457 - 0.562)以及其他癌症亚型(HR =1.432;95%CI:1.298 - 1.581)。 结论:中国和美国食管癌患者的预后因素可能存在一些差异。这表明应针对不同人群考虑不同的食管癌管理策略,以改善患者的预后。

相似文献

[1]
Comparison of prognostic factors of esophageal cancer between a Chinese cohort and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database: a retrospective cohort study.

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022-4

[2]
A Competing Risk Analysis Study of Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma 2006-2015 Using Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.

Med Sci Monit. 2020-1-22

[3]
Development and validation of a prognostic predictive model of pulmonary spindle cell carcinoma from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results database.

Transl Cancer Res. 2022-8

[4]
Survival and prognostic factors for postoperative primary appendiceal cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022-6

[5]
A retrospective comparative cohort study of SEER database analysis of the prognostic value of breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in patients with multifocal multicenter breast cancer.

Gland Surg. 2023-2-28

[6]
The prognosis of patients with small cell carcinoma of the cervix: a retrospective study of the SEER database and a Chinese multicentre registry.

Lancet Oncol. 2023-6

[7]
Focus on patients with early esophageal cancer-a prognostic nomogram.

Transl Cancer Res. 2020-12

[8]
Treatment of clinical T4 stage superior sulcus non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Biosci Rep. 2019-2-1

[9]
The prognostic performance of the log odds of positive lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A population study of the US SEER database and a Chinese single-institution cohort.

Cancer Med. 2021-9

[10]
Competing risk of the specific mortality among Asian-American patients with prostate cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis.

BMC Urol. 2022-3-24

引用本文的文献

[1]
Downregulation of SMAD2 and SMAD4 is associated with poor prognosis and shorter survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Mol Biol Rep. 2025-3-3

[2]
A predictive model for advanced esophageal cancer involving the lower third of the esophagus.

Transl Cancer Res. 2024-12-31

[3]
The Japanese Esophageal Society classification for prediction of superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia invasion depth: Validation in a Western population.

United European Gastroenterol J. 2024-10

[4]
Expression of Interleukin-8, Interleukin-12 and Interleukin-13 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Biomarker Potentiality and Prognostic Significance.

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024-9

本文引用的文献

[1]
Cancer incidence, mortality, and burden in China: a time-trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020.

Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021-10

[2]
Survival benefit of perioperative chemotherapy for T1-3N0M0 stage esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis.

J Thorac Dis. 2021-2

[3]
Tumor Size as a Critical Prognostic Factor in T1-2 Stage Esophageal Cancer.

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020-8-17

[4]
Specific DNA methylation markers in the diagnosis and prognosis of esophageal cancer.

Aging (Albany NY). 2019-12-13

[5]
Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer.

Surg Today. 2019-9-18

[6]
Tumor Volume Index as a Prognostic Factor in Patients after Curative Esophageal Cancer Resection.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019-3-19

[7]
Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: Comparison between a Chinese cohort and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data.

Cancer Med. 2019-2-10

[8]
Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods.

Int J Cancer. 2018-12-6

[9]
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin and S-1 for Resectable Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Anticancer Res. 2018-9

[10]
Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.

Lancet. 2017-9-16

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索