Chelminski Kathryn
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
J Environ Dev. 2022 Jun;31(2):139-167. doi: 10.1177/10704965211070034. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
In light of commitments made under the UNFCCC Paris Agreement and Glasgow Climate Pact, trillions of dollars are needed to fund climate mitigation and adaptation in developing countries. However, few studies have investigated the effectiveness of climate finance or how it impacts barriers to renewable energy development in recipient countries. This article contributes to the literature by investigating climate finance effectiveness through comparative case study analysis of its impacts on geothermal development in Indonesia and the Philippines. The article finds that three mechanisms of climate finance-utility modifier, social learning and capacity building-work interdependently in impacting the financial, regulatory, and technical barriers to geothermal development in Indonesia and the Philippines but are individually insufficient to scale the industry; political will and energy shocks play a significant intervening role. This paper raises policy implications for climate finance effectiveness and renewable energy technology deployment in developing countries.
根据《联合国气候变化框架公约巴黎协定》和《格拉斯哥气候公约》所做的承诺,需要数万亿美元来资助发展中国家的气候缓解和适应工作。然而,很少有研究调查气候融资的有效性,或者它如何影响受援国可再生能源发展的障碍。本文通过对印度尼西亚和菲律宾地热开发影响的比较案例研究分析气候融资有效性,为该文献做出了贡献。文章发现,气候融资的三种机制——公用事业调节、社会学习和能力建设——在影响印度尼西亚和菲律宾地热开发的金融、监管和技术障碍方面相互依存地发挥作用,但单独不足以扩大该行业规模;政治意愿和能源冲击发挥了重要的干预作用。本文提出了关于发展中国家气候融资有效性和可再生能源技术部署的政策建议。