Mosca Antonella, Della Volpe Luca, Alisi Anna, Veraldi Silvio, Francalanci Paola, Maggiore Giuseppe
Hepatogastroenterology, Nutrition, Digestive Endoscopy and Liver Transplant Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Research Unit of Molecular Genetics of Complex Phenotypes, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 26;10:885576. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.885576. eCollection 2022.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a multifaceted disease that includes a wide spectrum of liver damage. The presence and the degree of fibrosis are considered important factors for the prognosis of NAFLD and in predicting the risk of developing cirrhosis. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of four fibrosis scores (aspartate aminotransferase/Platelet Index [APRI], FIB-4, NAFLD Fibrosis Score [NFS], and Hepamet) in predicting different degrees of fibrosis among children with biopsy-proven NAFLD.
About 286 adolescents [mean age 14.3 years ± 2.5; 154 (53.6%) males], referred between January 2014 and December 2019, with biopsy-proven NAFLD were enrolled.
About 173 (60.4%) patients presented fibrosis at histological analysis. In particular: 140 (49.3%) patients had = 1, 31 (10.8%), had = 2 and 2 (0.66%) had = 3. APRI (AUROC 0.619, 95% CI 0.556-0.679) and Hepamet (AUROC 0.778, 95% CI 0.722-0.828) scores had significant ( < 0.001) accuracy to distinguish subjects with fibrosis; while NFS and FIB-4 had not. APRI had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 62.77% (95% CI 57.96-67.35) and an negative predictive value (NPV) of 52.01% (95% CI 46.54-57.43); Hepamet a PPV of 63.24% (95% CI 59.95-66.41) and an NPV of 61.29% (52.9-69.01).
Our study showed that Hepamet and APRI perform better than NFS and FIB-4 for identifying fibrosis in patients with NAFLD, but do not have PPVs so high to be considered diagnostic. Therefore, they cannot be employed, in children, for a certain diagnosis of fibrosis or its progression and cannot replace liver biopsy as the gold diagnostic standard. It is, therefore, necessary to continue to research and develop new markers of exclusive fibrosis.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是一种多方面的疾病,包括广泛的肝损伤。纤维化的存在和程度被认为是NAFLD预后以及预测肝硬化发生风险的重要因素。我们的目的是评估四种纤维化评分(天冬氨酸转氨酶/血小板指数[APRI]、FIB-4、NAFLD纤维化评分[NFS]和Hepamet)在预测经活检证实为NAFLD的儿童不同程度纤维化中的作用。
纳入2014年1月至2019年12月期间转诊的约286名青少年[平均年龄14.3岁±2.5;154名(53.6%)男性],他们经活检证实患有NAFLD。
在组织学分析中,约173名(60.4%)患者出现纤维化。具体而言:140名(49.3%)患者纤维化程度为F1,31名(10.8%)为F2,2名(0.66%)为F3。APRI(曲线下面积0.619,95%置信区间0.556 - 0.679)和Hepamet(曲线下面积0.778,95%置信区间0.722 - 0.828)评分在区分有纤维化的受试者方面具有显著(P < 0.001)准确性;而NFS和FIB-4则没有。APRI的阳性预测值(PPV)为62.77%(95%置信区间57.96 - 67.35),阴性预测值(NPV)为52.01%(95%置信区间46.54 - 57.43);Hepamet的PPV为63.24%(95%置信区间59.95 - 66.41),NPV为61.29%(52.9 - 69.01)。
我们的研究表明,在识别NAFLD患者的纤维化方面,Hepamet和APRI比NFS和FIB-4表现更好,但PPV不够高,不能被视为诊断性指标。因此,在儿童中,它们不能用于确诊纤维化或其进展情况,也不能替代肝活检作为金标准诊断方法。所以,有必要继续研发新的特异性纤维化标志物。