Courtillon Céline, Allée Chantal, Amelot Michel, Keita Alassane, Bougeard Stéphanie, Härtle Sonja, Rouby Jean-Claude, Eterradossi Nicolas, Soubies Sebastien Mathieu
Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, OIE Reference Laboratory for Infectious Bursal Disease, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), VIPAC Unit, Ploufragan, France.
Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), SELEAC Service, Ploufragan, France.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 25;9:871549. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.871549. eCollection 2022.
Immunosuppression in poultry production is a recurrent problem worldwide, and one of the major viral immunosuppressive agents is Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV). IBDV infections are mostly controlled by using live-attenuated vaccines. Live-attenuated Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) vaccine candidates are classified as "mild," "intermediate," "intermediate-plus" or "hot" based on their residual immunosuppressive properties. The immunosuppression protocol described by the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) uses a lethal Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) infectious challenge to measure the interference of a given IBDV vaccine candidate on NDV vaccine immune response. A Ph. Eur.-derived protocol was thus implemented to quantify immunosuppression induced by one mild, two intermediate, and four intermediate-plus live-attenuated IBD vaccines as well as a pathogenic viral strain. This protocol confirmed the respective immunosuppressive properties of those vaccines and virus. In the search for a more ethical alternative to Ph. Eur.-based protocols, two strategies were explored. First, viral replication of those vaccines and the pathogenic strain in stimulated chicken primary bursal cells was assessed. Replication levels were not strictly correlated to immunosuppression observed . Second, changes in blood leukocyte counts in chicks were monitored using a Ph. Eur. - type protocol prior to lethal NDV challenge. In case of intermediate-plus vaccines, the drop in B cells counts was more severe. Counting blood B cells may thus represent a highly quantitative, faster, and ethical strategy than NDV challenge to assess the immunosuppression induced in chickens by live-attenuated IBD vaccines.
家禽生产中的免疫抑制是一个在全球范围内反复出现的问题,传染性法氏囊病病毒(IBDV)是主要的病毒免疫抑制因子之一。IBDV感染大多通过使用减毒活疫苗来控制。减毒活传染性法氏囊病(IBD)候选疫苗根据其残留的免疫抑制特性被分类为“轻度”、“中度”、“中度加强型”或“强毒型”。欧洲药典(Ph. Eur.)描述的免疫抑制方案使用致死性新城疫病毒(NDV)感染性攻毒来测量给定的IBDV候选疫苗对NDV疫苗免疫反应的干扰。因此,实施了一项源自欧洲药典的方案,以量化一种轻度、两种中度和四种中度加强型减毒活IBD疫苗以及一种致病性病毒株诱导的免疫抑制。该方案证实了这些疫苗和病毒各自的免疫抑制特性。为了寻找一种比基于欧洲药典的方案更符合伦理的替代方案,探索了两种策略。首先,评估了这些疫苗和致病菌株在刺激的鸡原代法氏囊细胞中的病毒复制情况。复制水平与观察到的免疫抑制并不严格相关。其次,在致死性NDV攻毒之前,使用欧洲药典类型的方案监测雏鸡血液白细胞计数的变化。对于中度加强型疫苗,B细胞计数的下降更为严重。因此,与NDV攻毒相比,计数血液中的B细胞可能是一种更具定量性、更快且符合伦理的策略,用于评估减毒活IBD疫苗在鸡中诱导的免疫抑制。