Suppr超能文献

高流量鼻导管在小儿毛细支气管炎中的疗效和安全性分析:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety analysis of high-flow nasal cannula in children with bronchiolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Cao Juan, Cai Qiuyue, Xing Yu, Zhong Lihua, Wen Changsi, Huang Huimin

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Hainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital, Haikou, China.

Department of Pediatrics, Hainan Women and Children's Medical Center, Haikou, China.

出版信息

Transl Pediatr. 2022 Apr;11(4):547-555. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-73.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oxygen therapy is one of the most common treatments for bronchiolitis, But traditional standard oxygen therapy is poorly tolerated by patients. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) also has many contraindications. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), as a new method of adjunctive respiratory support, has received extensive attention in oxygen therapy in pediatric. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of HFNC in the treatment of infant bronchiolitis.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, GeenMedical, Wanfang, and Weipu using the following keywords: children with respiratory diseases, infant bronchiolitis, bronchiolitis treatment, HFNCs, warming and humidifying high-flow, nasal catheter oxygen inhalation, and conventional oxygen therapy. The publication time was set from the establishment of the database to October 2021. Selected articles were randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies in which the patients were less than 16 years old and the experimental group was treated with HFNCs, and the control group was treated with nCPAP or conventional oxygen. After extracting the data, the study subjects were divided into HFNC treatment and control groups. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included literature, and RevMan 5.30 was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seven articles met the inclusion criteria. All articles described random sequence generation, four articles reported on allocation concealment, only two articles reported on the double-blind method. All articles described the complete blinding of outcome evaluation bias, outcome data bias, selective reporting bias, and other risk biases. The HFNC treatment group included 436 children, 405 children treated with nCPAP or standard oxygen therapy were included in the control. The results showed that the failure rate [relative risk (RR) is 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.76], respiratory rate [mean difference (MD) is -7.43, 95% CI: -8.42 to -6.43], and social function (MD is 0.76, 95% CI: -0.32 to 1.83) of HFNC-treated children with bronchiolitis were significantly different to that of the control group patients.

DISCUSSION

HFNC treatment provides the same improvement in arterial oxygen partial pressure as standard oxygen therapy or transnasal positive airway pressure treatment, but it is significantly better at improving the respiratory rate of children with bronchiolitis.

摘要

背景

氧疗是毛细支气管炎最常见的治疗方法之一,但传统标准氧疗患者耐受性差。鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)也有许多禁忌症。高流量鼻导管(HFNC)作为一种新的辅助呼吸支持方法,在儿科氧疗中受到广泛关注。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了HFNC治疗婴儿毛细支气管炎的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们使用以下关键词在PubMed、Web of Science、CNKI、GeenMedical、万方和维普进行检索:患有呼吸系统疾病的儿童、婴儿毛细支气管炎、毛细支气管炎治疗、HFNC、温热加湿高流量、鼻导管吸氧和传统氧疗。发表时间设定为从数据库建立到2021年10月。入选文章为随机对照试验(RCT)研究,患者年龄小于16岁,实验组采用HFNC治疗,对照组采用nCPAP或传统氧疗。提取数据后,将研究对象分为HFNC治疗组和对照组。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入文献的质量,使用RevMan 5.30进行荟萃分析。

结果

七篇文章符合纳入标准。所有文章均描述了随机序列生成,四篇文章报道了分配隐藏,只有两篇文章报道了双盲法。所有文章均描述了结局评估偏倚、结局数据偏倚、选择性报告偏倚和其他风险偏倚的完全盲法。HFNC治疗组包括436名儿童,对照组包括405名接受nCPAP或标准氧疗的儿童。结果显示,HFNC治疗的毛细支气管炎患儿的失败率[相对危险度(RR)为0.57,95%可信区间:0.43-0.76]、呼吸频率[平均差(MD)为-7.43,95%可信区间:-8.42至-6.43]和社会功能(MD为0.76,95%可信区间:-0.32至1.83)与对照组患者有显著差异。

讨论

HFNC治疗在提高动脉血氧分压方面与标准氧疗或经鼻气道正压治疗效果相同,但在改善毛细支气管炎患儿呼吸频率方面明显更好。

相似文献

2
High-flow nasal cannula therapy for infants with bronchiolitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 20;2014(1):CD009609. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009609.pub2.
3
High-flow nasal cannula therapy for children with bronchiolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Jun;104(6):564-576. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315846. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
6
High flow nasal cannula as respiratory support in treating infant bronchiolitis: a systematic review.
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 May;179(5):711-718. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03637-0. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Is high-flow nasal cannula better for children with bronchiolitis?
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Oct;11(10):1731-1732. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-248.
2
Clarification of issues brought up by ''.
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Oct;11(10):1733-1734. doi: 10.21037/tp-2022-03.

本文引用的文献

1
The cost-utility of early use of high-flow nasal cannula in bronchiolitis.
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Oct 28;11(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00339-7.
2
High-Flow Nasal Cannula Use and Patient-Centered Outcomes for Pediatric Bronchiolitis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2130927. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30927.
3
A randomised trial of high-flow nasal cannula in infants with moderate bronchiolitis.
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul 16;56(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01926-2019. Print 2020 Jul.
4
Short-Term High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Moderate to Severe Bronchiolitis Is Effective in a General Pediatric Ward.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2019 Dec;58(14):1522-1527. doi: 10.1177/0009922819877881. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
5
Oxygen therapy with high-flow nasal cannulas in children with acute bronchiolitis.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(1):51-55. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2019.0010.
10
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for infants with bronchiolitis: pilot study.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 May;50(5):373-8. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12509. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验