Duan Yawei, Feng Jingge, Zhu Youyi, Li Hongda, Liu Xintong, Zhou Hualei, Li Wenjun
Beijing Key Laboratory for Science and Application of Functional Molecular and Crystalline Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing Beijing 100083 China
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, China National Petroleum Corporation Beijing 100083 China.
RSC Adv. 2018 Nov 15;8(67):38606-38613. doi: 10.1039/c8ra05816d. eCollection 2018 Nov 14.
Petroleum sulfonates are broadly employed to increase the oil recovery efficiency in tertiary recovery, while the content of di-sulfonates in petroleum sulfonates is a critical factor in the flushing efficiency, because it adversely impacts the decrease of oil-water interfacial tension. Thus far, no methods have been considered convenient and reliable to determine the contents of mono- and di-sulfonates besides the traditional extraction method. This study established a simple and practical approach of acid-base titration coupled with traditional two-phase titration to measure the contents of mono- and di-sulfonates in petroleum sulfonates. To judge the reliability of the approach, the actives of petroleum sulfonates were separated into mono- and di-sulfonates using the traditional extraction method, the separation effect of which was confirmed using infrared spectroscopy and main elemental analysis. As the results demonstrated, all the contents of di-sulfonates in four petroleum sulfonates measured by the acid-base titration method are similar to those found by the extraction method. The contents of di-sulfonates (%) in four petroleum sulfonate samples were measured by comparing acid-base titration with the extraction method; respectively they were 8.57/8.19, 5.67/5.98, 5.61/5.35 and 2.37/2.15; the relative error of the measured di-sulfonates is about 6%, which satisfies the titration accuracy of petroleum sulfonates. In parallel experiments, the results of five acid-base titrations are very close, and the precision of the acid-base titration method was about 3%. Accordingly, this systematic approach by combining the new acid-base titration and traditional two-phase titration is of great significance to develop the evaluation system of petroleum sulfonates.
石油磺酸盐广泛应用于三次采油中以提高原油采收率,而石油磺酸盐中二磺酸盐的含量是影响驱油效率的关键因素,因为它会对油水界面张力的降低产生不利影响。到目前为止,除了传统的萃取方法外,还没有被认为方便可靠的方法来测定单磺酸盐和二磺酸盐的含量。本研究建立了一种简单实用的酸碱滴定与传统两相滴定相结合的方法来测定石油磺酸盐中单磺酸盐和二磺酸盐的含量。为了判断该方法的可靠性,采用传统萃取方法将石油磺酸盐中的活性成分分离为单磺酸盐和二磺酸盐,并用红外光谱和主要元素分析对分离效果进行了确认。结果表明,用酸碱滴定法测得的四种石油磺酸盐中二磺酸盐的含量均与萃取法测得的结果相似。通过酸碱滴定法与萃取法对比测定了四个石油磺酸盐样品中二磺酸盐的含量(%),分别为8.57/8.19、5.67/5.98、5.61/5.35和2.37/2.15;测得的二磺酸盐相对误差约为6%,满足石油磺酸盐的滴定精度要求。在平行实验中,五次酸碱滴定的结果非常接近,酸碱滴定法的精密度约为3%。因此,这种将新的酸碱滴定法与传统两相滴定法相结合的系统方法对开发石油磺酸盐评价体系具有重要意义。