• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国公众对肥胖预防政策的接受度。

Public acceptance of obesity prevention policies in the UK.

机构信息

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham, UK.

Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

J Cancer Policy. 2021 Mar;27:100256. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2020.100256. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcpo.2020.100256
PMID:35559933
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Half of the UK population will get cancer during their lifetime, with the current survival rate at 50 %. Behavioural factors such as obesity contribute to two-fifths of the UK's most common cancers. Food 'pricing' and 'place and promotion' policies aim to avert this risk by reducing the rate of obesity in the UK.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey collected data on the acceptance of obesity-related pricing and place and promotion policies from 3293 UK adults in 2016. Cross-tabulations and chi-squared tests were performed to investigate the support for these policies in the four UK countries and different socioeconomic groups.

RESULTS

Only two-fifths of respondents supported all policies. Food place and promotion policies were better supported by the public than taxation, with over 70 % support for the promotion of healthy foods as opposed to 40 % support for 'fat tax'. The most deprived social groups were least supportive of all policies. There was not a noticeable difference in policy support between the four UK countries.

CONCLUSION

The support for obesity policies is low, most notably amongst lower socioeconomic groups and for policies involving a price increase, across the UK.

POLICY SUMMARY

Obesity prevention policies could reduce the rate of related cancers, but their success requires public support and acceptance. Increasing tax on unhealthy foods is less well supported in the UK population than policies which affect the in-store placement and promotion of these products. Lower levels of support for all these policies among low-income groups, among whom obesity and cancer rates are highest, indicate a particular need for strategies to increase policy support in these groups.

摘要

背景

英国有一半的人口会在一生中患上癌症,目前的存活率为 50%。肥胖等行为因素导致英国五分之二最常见的癌症。食品“定价”和“地点和促销”政策旨在通过降低英国的肥胖率来规避这一风险。

方法

2016 年,一项横断面调查从 3293 名英国成年人那里收集了有关接受肥胖相关定价和地点及促销政策的数据。通过交叉表和卡方检验,调查了这些政策在英国四个国家和不同社会经济群体中的支持情况。

结果

只有五分之二的受访者支持所有政策。与税收相比,食品地点和促销政策更受公众支持,超过 70%的人支持推广健康食品,而只有 40%的人支持“脂肪税”。最贫困的社会群体对所有政策的支持度最低。在四个英国国家之间,政策支持没有明显差异。

结论

英国对肥胖政策的支持率较低,尤其是在社会经济地位较低的群体中,以及涉及价格上涨的政策方面。

政策总结

肥胖预防政策可以降低相关癌症的发病率,但要取得成功,需要得到公众的支持和认可。对不健康食品征收更高的税在英国民众中的支持度不如影响这些产品店内摆放和促销的政策。在低收入群体中,所有这些政策的支持率都较低,而这些群体的肥胖率和癌症率最高,这表明需要特别制定策略来提高这些群体对政策的支持度。

相似文献

1
Public acceptance of obesity prevention policies in the UK.英国公众对肥胖预防政策的接受度。
J Cancer Policy. 2021 Mar;27:100256. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2020.100256. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Putting a price on healthy eating: public perceptions of the need for further food pricing policies in the UK.为健康饮食定价:英国公众对进一步实施食品定价政策的必要性看法。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Nov 29;45(4):e722-e728. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad152.
3
Taxation of sugar sweetened beverages and unhealthy foods: a qualitative study of key opinion leaders' views.对含糖饮料和不健康食品征税:一项关于关键意见领袖观点的定性研究
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Jul 31;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0240-1.
4
Message framing to inform cancer prevention pricing interventions in the UK and USA: a factorial experiment, 2019.信息框设计以告知英国和美国的癌症预防定价干预措施:一项 2019 年的析因实验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 25;11(1):e041324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041324.
5
Obesity prevention strategies: could food or soda taxes improve health?肥胖预防策略:食品税或汽水税能改善健康状况吗?
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2016 Mar;46(1):32-8. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2016.109.
6
Support for, and perceived effectiveness of, the UK soft drinks industry levy among UK adults: cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study.英国成年人对英国软饮料行业征税的支持及其感知效果:国际粮食政策研究的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e026698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026698.
7
Public support for obesity prevention policies in Western Australia from 2012 to 2020: Findings from cross-sectional surveys.2012 年至 2020 年澳大利亚西部公众对肥胖预防政策的支持:来自横断面调查的结果。
Health Promot J Austr. 2024 Jul;35(3):701-712. doi: 10.1002/hpja.801. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
8
Governments policy measures to address obesity among adults: a scoping review of the global evidence.政府针对成年人肥胖问题的政策措施:全球证据的范围综述。
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02132-3.
9
Acceptability and perceived harm of calorie labeling and other obesity policies: A cross-sectional survey study of UK adults with eating disorders and other mental health conditions.接受度和感知危害的卡路里标注和其他肥胖政策:对患有饮食障碍和其他心理健康问题的英国成年人进行的横断面调查研究。
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Nov;56(11):2049-2061. doi: 10.1002/eat.24031. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
10
Community support for policy interventions targeting unhealthy food environments in public institutions.社区对针对公共机构不健康食品环境的政策干预措施的支持。
Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Jul;33(3):618-630. doi: 10.1002/hpja.567. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability and perceived harm of calorie labeling and other obesity policies: A cross-sectional survey study of UK adults with eating disorders and other mental health conditions.接受度和感知危害的卡路里标注和其他肥胖政策:对患有饮食障碍和其他心理健康问题的英国成年人进行的横断面调查研究。
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Nov;56(11):2049-2061. doi: 10.1002/eat.24031. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
Public acceptability of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: repeat cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study (2017-2019).英国软饮料行业征税的公众接受度:国际粮食政策研究(2017-2019 年)的重复横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 24;11(9):e051677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051677.