Giuliani L, Giberti C, Martorana G, Isotta A, Neumaier C E
Eur Urol. 1987;13(1-2):26-30. doi: 10.1159/000472731.
During a 15-year period, 34 patients with renal cell carcinoma extending into the inferior vena cava were submitted to radical ablative surgery at our institution. 8 patients had caval tumor thrombus (TT) extension at the level of the renal veins, 17 had infrahepatic, 8 retrohepatic and 1 atrial TT extension. Cavography, computerized tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) were performed preoperatively on 34, 24 and 16 of these 34 patients, respectively. The sensitivity of the techniques used in diagnosing caval involvement was 100, 97 and 87.5% for US, cavography and CT, respectively. The upper limits of TT were clearly detected by US, CT and cavography in 100, 95 and 76% of diagnosed cases, respectively. From this study it appears that US and CT have a sensitivity comparable to cavography in the detection of caval TT. However, US and CT allow a more precise delineation of the upper limits of TT if compared to cavography. This implies that the role of cavography in diagnosing caval TT and its upper limits must be reappraised in light of the progress of noninvasive outpatient procedures.
在15年期间,34例肾细胞癌侵犯下腔静脉的患者在我们机构接受了根治性切除手术。8例患者的肿瘤血栓(TT)延伸至肾静脉水平,17例为肝下型,8例为肝后型,1例为心房型TT延伸。这34例患者中,分别有34例、24例和16例在术前进行了腔静脉造影、计算机断层扫描(CT)和超声检查(US)。US、腔静脉造影和CT诊断腔静脉受累的技术敏感性分别为100%、97%和87.5%。在100%、95%和76%的确诊病例中,US、CT和腔静脉造影分别清晰检测到TT的上限。从这项研究看来,在检测腔静脉TT方面,US和CT的敏感性与腔静脉造影相当。然而,与腔静脉造影相比,US和CT能更精确地描绘TT的上限。这意味着,鉴于非侵入性门诊检查技术的进步,必须重新评估腔静脉造影在诊断腔静脉TT及其上限方面的作用。