• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准化抬臂压力试验在神经源性胸廓出口综合征诊断中的可靠性和有效性。

Reliability and validity of the standardized elevated arm stress test in the diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.

作者信息

Pesser Niels, de Bruijn Britt I, Goeteyn Jens, Verhofstad Nicole, Houterman Saskia, van Sambeek Marc R H M, Thompson Robert W, van Nuenen Bart F L, Teijink Joep A W

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Physical Therapy Sciences, Program in Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):821-829.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.885. Epub 2022 May 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.885
PMID:35561941
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We developed a standardized elevated arm stress test (sEAST) meter to standardize patients' posture and measure additional grip and fatigue parameters. In the present prospective cohort study, we aimed to determine the reliability and validity of the sEAST in the diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS).

METHODS

Patients evaluated for NTOS between October 2018 and February 2020 were included and performed the sEAST. The patients were classified into a proven NTOS group or a symptomatic control group using the reporting standards for NTOS and the outcome of thoracic outlet decompression surgery. Healthy persons were recruited as an asymptomatic control group. The test-retest reliability, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each sEAST parameter.

RESULTS

A total of 426 patients with suspected NTOS and 147 healthy controls had performed the sEAST. The validity analysis was performed with data from 111 patients with proven NTOS, 94 symptomatic controls, and 147 asymptomatic controls. The reporting standards were inconclusive for 116 patients; 77 patients had been excluded because thoracic outlet decompression surgery had not been performed or was unsuccessful, and 28 because they had arterial or venous thoracic outlet syndrome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the proven NTOS group compared with the asymptomatic control and symptomatic control groups ranged from 0.59 to 0.77 and 0.54 to 0.63, respectively. The positive predictive value ranged from 46% to 65% and the negative predictive value from 51% to 66%. The test-retest reliability analysis for 80 patients with multiple sEAST measurements showed moderate to good (0.52-0.87) intraclass correlation coefficient values for the duration and grip strength parameters. However, the grip fatigue parameters demonstrated poor (0.46-0.16) intraclass correlation coefficient values.

CONCLUSIONS

The sEAST showed good test-retest reliability for the duration and grip strength parameters. However, the discriminative value of all sEAST parameters was low for NTOS diagnostics. The good test-retest reliability of the sEAST parameters indicates that they could be valuable outcome measures for comparison in a diagnostic care pathway.

摘要

目的

我们开发了一种标准化的抬臂应力测试(sEAST)仪,以规范患者姿势并测量额外的握力和疲劳参数。在本前瞻性队列研究中,我们旨在确定sEAST在诊断神经源性胸廓出口综合征(NTOS)中的可靠性和有效性。

方法

纳入2018年10月至2020年2月期间接受NTOS评估的患者并进行sEAST测试。根据NTOS报告标准和胸廓出口减压手术结果,将患者分为确诊NTOS组或症状性对照组。招募健康人作为无症状对照组。计算每个sEAST参数的重测信度、受试者操作特征曲线下面积以及阳性和阴性预测值。

结果

共有426例疑似NTOS患者和147例健康对照进行了sEAST测试。对111例确诊NTOS患者、94例症状性对照和147例无症状对照的数据进行了有效性分析。116例患者的报告标准不明确;77例患者因未进行胸廓出口减压手术或手术不成功而被排除,28例因患有动脉或静脉胸廓出口综合征而被排除。确诊NTOS组与无症状对照组和症状性对照组相比,受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.59至0.77和0.54至0.63。阳性预测值为46%至65%,阴性预测值为51%至66%。对80例进行多次sEAST测量的患者进行的重测信度分析显示,持续时间和握力参数的组内相关系数值为中度至良好(0.52 - 0.87)。然而,握力疲劳参数的组内相关系数值较差(0.46 - 0.16)。

结论

sEAST在持续时间和握力参数方面显示出良好的重测信度。然而,所有sEAST参数对NTOS诊断的鉴别价值较低。sEAST参数良好的重测信度表明,它们可能是诊断护理路径中用于比较的有价值的结果指标。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the standardized elevated arm stress test in the diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.标准化抬臂压力试验在神经源性胸廓出口综合征诊断中的可靠性和有效性。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):821-829.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.885. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Reliability and validity of the elevated arm stress test in the diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.上肢抬高试验诊断神经源性胸廓出口综合征的可靠性和有效性。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):814-820. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.883. Epub 2022 May 10.
3
Feasibility and Outcomes of a Multidisciplinary Care Pathway for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.神经源性胸廓出口综合征多学科护理路径的可行性和结果:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jun;61(6):1017-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.048. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
4
Development and validation of a prediction model for outcomes after transaxillary first rib resection for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome following strict Society for Vascular Surgery diagnostic criteria.基于血管外科学会严格的诊断标准,为神经源性胸廓出口综合征患者经腋路第一肋骨切除术后的结局建立并验证预测模型。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Feb;77(2):606-615. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.014. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
5
Rib-sparing scalenectomy for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: Early results.保留肋骨的前斜角肌切除术治疗神经源性胸廓出口综合征:早期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):2059-2063. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.12.052. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Differences in quality of life outcomes after paraclavicular decompression for thoracic outlet syndrome.胸出口综合征行锁骨下间隙减压术后生活质量结局的差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1421-1426. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.037. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
7
Outcomes of surgical paraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression.锁骨旁胸廓出口减压术的手术效果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;28(2):457-64. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.02.029. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
8
Thoracic outlet decompression surgery for Gilliatt-Sumner hand as a presentation of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.胸廓出口减压术治疗 Gilliat-Sumner 手,为神经源性胸廓出口综合征的表现。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1985-1992. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.133. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
9
Redo surgery for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is useful.神经源性胸廓出口综合征的再次手术是有用的。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Aug;76(2):531-537.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.863. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
10
Long-term outcomes after surgical treatment of pediatric neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.小儿神经源性胸廓出口综合征手术治疗后的长期疗效
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Jan;21(1):54-64. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.PEDS17257. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Arthroscopic Pectoralis Minor Release and Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Decompression for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Novel Treatment for an Old Problem.关节镜下胸小肌松解及锁骨下臂丛神经减压治疗神经源性胸廓出口综合征:针对老问题的新疗法
JB JS Open Access. 2025 Mar 14;10(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00203. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
Participation of Arterial Ischemia in Positional-Related Symptoms among Patients Referred for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.动脉缺血在因胸廓出口综合征转诊患者的体位相关症状中的作用。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 4;13(13):3925. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133925.
3
Role of Lifestyle in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review.
生活方式在胸廓出口综合征中的作用:一篇叙述性综述。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 11;13(2):417. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020417.
4
Surgical approaches for thoracic outlet decompression in the treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome.用于治疗胸廓出口综合征的胸廓出口减压手术入路。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Dec 30;15(12):7088-7099. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-546. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
5
General Overview and Diagnostic (Imaging) Techniques for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.神经源性胸廓出口综合征的概述与诊断(影像学)技术
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 4;13(9):1625. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091625.