• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙结直肠癌筛查的相关因素:2017年全国健康调查结果

Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening in Spain: Results of the 2017 National Health Survey.

作者信息

Nouni-García Rauf, Lara-López Ángela, Carratalá-Munuera Concepción, Gil-Guillén Vicente F, López-Pineda Adriana, Orozco-Beltrán Domingo, Quesada Jose A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, Ctra. Nnal. 332 Alicante-Valencia s/n, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain.

San Juan de Alicante Campus, Faculty of Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, 03202 San Juan de Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;19(9):5460. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095460.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19095460
PMID:35564855
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9100170/
Abstract

This study aimed to determine the CRC screening coverage of people aged between 50 and 69 years who were living in Spain in 2017 and describe the factors associated with not having had a faecal occult blood test (FOBT). A cross-sectional study was performed using data from the Spanish National Health Survey 2017. We analysed 7568 individuals between the ages of 50 and 69 years. The proportion of respondents between 50 and 69 years old who had had an FOBT was 29.0% ( = 2191). The three autonomous communities with the lowest proportion of respondents who had had an FOBT were Extremadura (8.7%, = 16), Ceuta-Melilla (10.4%, = 3), and Andalucia (14.1%, = 186). The variables associated with not having had an FOBT were being 50-54 years old (PR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.14), having been born outside of Spain (PR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.06-1.16), not having been vaccinated against the flu (PR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.15), never having had a colonoscopy (PR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.40-1.59), not having had an ultrasound scan in the last year (PR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.14), and not having seen a primary care physician in the last month (PR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.04-1.12). The factors associated with not getting an FOBT were young age, having been born outside of Spain, not having been vaccinated against the flu in the last campaign, and not making frequent use of healthcare services.

摘要

本研究旨在确定2017年居住在西班牙的50至69岁人群的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查覆盖率,并描述与未进行粪便潜血试验(FOBT)相关的因素。使用2017年西班牙国家健康调查的数据进行了一项横断面研究。我们分析了7568名年龄在50至69岁之间的个体。50至69岁进行过FOBT的受访者比例为29.0%(n = 2191)。进行FOBT的受访者比例最低的三个自治区是埃斯特雷马杜拉(8.7%,n = 16)、休达-梅利利亚(10.4%,n = 3)和安达卢西亚(14.1%,n = 186)。与未进行FOBT相关的变量包括年龄在50 - 54岁(PR = 1.09;95%CI 1.04 - 1.14)、出生在西班牙境外(PR = 1.11;95%CI 1.06 - 1.16)、未接种流感疫苗(PR = 1.09;95%CI 1.04 - 1.15)、从未进行过结肠镜检查(PR = 1.49;95%CI 1.40 - 1.59)、过去一年未进行超声检查(PR = 1.09;95%CI 1.04 - 1.14)以及过去一个月未看过初级保健医生(PR = 1.08;95%CI 1.04 - 1.12)。与未进行FOBT相关的因素包括年龄小、出生在西班牙境外、在上次流感疫苗接种活动中未接种以及不经常使用医疗服务。

相似文献

1
Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening in Spain: Results of the 2017 National Health Survey.西班牙结直肠癌筛查的相关因素:2017年全国健康调查结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;19(9):5460. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095460.
2
Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.2010 年全国健康访谈调查中的结直肠癌检测使用情况,包括 CT 结肠成像。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jun;21(6):895-904. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0192. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
3
Adherence to and predictors of participation in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing in Spain, 2009-2011.2009 - 2011年西班牙粪便潜血检测在结直肠癌筛查中的参与率及预测因素
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015 Jul;24(4):305-12. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000088.
4
Physician-office vs home uptake of colorectal cancer screening using FOBT/FIT among screening-eligible US adults.在符合筛查条件的美国成年人中,使用粪便潜血试验/粪便免疫化学试验进行结直肠癌筛查,医生办公室与家庭的接受率比较。
Cancer Med. 2019 Dec;8(17):7408-7418. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2604. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
5
Results of National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Croatia (2007-2011).克罗地亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的结果(2007-2011 年)。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4300-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4300.
6
Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake.基于粪便潜血检测(FOBT)的结直肠癌筛查趋势及未使用的预测因素:南澳大利亚地区的研究结果及对提高FOBT接受率的启示
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):45-52. doi: 10.1071/AH16126.
7
Impact of a population-based colorectal cancer screening program on local health services demand in Italy: a 7-year survey in a northern province.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查计划对意大利当地卫生服务需求的影响:在北部一个省的 7 年调查。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov;106(11):1986-93. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.185. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
8
Fecal occult blood testing: people in Ontario are unaware of it and not ready for it.粪便潜血检测:安大略省的人们对此并不了解,也未做好接受检测的准备。
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Feb;55(2):176-177.e4.
9
[The populations attitudes to colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic].[捷克共和国民众对结直肠癌筛查的态度]
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2015 Mar;64(1):41-6.
10
Faecal occult blood test and colonoscopy use in Portugal: Results from the National Health Survey 2014.葡萄牙粪便潜血试验和结肠镜检查的应用:2014 年国家健康调查结果。
J Med Screen. 2020 Dec;27(4):171-185. doi: 10.1177/0969141319891456. Epub 2019 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender and sex differences in colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment.结直肠癌筛查、诊断和治疗中的性别差异。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Jan 17. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03801-0.
2
Prognostic Study of Colorectal Cancer: Differences between Screen-Detected and Symptom-Diagnosed Patients.结直肠癌的预后研究:筛查发现与症状诊断患者之间的差异
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;16(19):3363. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193363.
3
Evaluation of public awareness, knowledge, and attitudes about colorectal cancer screening among the general population in Al-qunfudah.对宰赫兰民众中结直肠癌筛查的公众意识、知识和态度的评估。 需注意,你提供的原文中“Al-qunfudah”常见的翻译是“宰赫兰” ,你可以根据实际情况确认其准确的中文地名。
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 15;14(4):1926-1934. doi: 10.62347/XKUW3822. eCollection 2024.
4
Cancer Screening: Present Recommendations, the Development of Multi-Cancer Early Development Tests, and the Prospect of Universal Cancer Screening.癌症筛查:当前建议、多癌早期检测试验的发展以及普遍癌症筛查的前景。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 18;16(6):1191. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061191.
5
Epidemiological Situation of High-Prevalence Non-Communicable Diseases in Spain: A Systematic Review.西班牙高流行率非传染性疾病的流行病学情况:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 15;12(22):7109. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227109.
6
[Actitudes e imágenes sociales sobre el cribado de cáncer colorrectal. Una aproximación exploratoria mediante grupos de discusión.].[关于结直肠癌筛查的社会态度和形象。通过讨论小组进行的探索性研究。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2023 Aug 10;97:e202308063.
7
Knowledge, Compliance, and Inequities in Colon Cancer Screening in Spain: An Exploratory Study.西班牙结肠癌筛查中的知识、依从性与不平等:一项探索性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 6;11(18):2475. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182475.

本文引用的文献

1
The association between adherence to cancer screening programs and health literacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症筛查计划依从性与健康素养的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2022 Feb;155:106927. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106927. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
2
Population-Based Data Reveal Factors Associated with Organised and Non-Organised Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Important Step towards Improving Coverage.基于人群的数据揭示了与有组织和无组织结直肠癌筛查相关的因素:这是提高覆盖率的重要一步。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 7;18(16):8373. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168373.
3
[Inequalities in access to cancer screening programmes in Spain and how to reduce them: data from 2013 and 2020.].[西班牙癌症筛查项目的获取不平等现象及其如何减少:2013年和2020年的数据。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021 Jan 26;95:e202101017.
4
[PAPPS Cancer Expert Group. Cancer Prevention Recommendations. 2020 PAPPS update].[PAPPS癌症专家小组。癌症预防建议。2020年PAPPS更新版]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Nov;52 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):44-69. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.09.003.
5
Factors Related to Non-participation in the Basque Country Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme.与巴斯克地区结直肠癌筛查计划参与度相关的因素。
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;8:604385. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604385. eCollection 2020.
6
Inequalities and risk factors related to non-participation in colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.与未参与结直肠癌筛查计划相关的不平等现象和风险因素:一项系统综述
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;31(2):346-355. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa203.
7
The PRECEDE-PROCEED model as a tool in Public Health screening: a systematic review.作为公共卫生筛查工具的“倾向-促成-强化-教育-生态诊断-评价-处置”(PRECEDE-PROCEED)模型:一项系统综述
Clin Ter. 2020 Mar-Apr;171(2):e167-e177. doi: 10.7417/CT.2020.2208.
8
The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN): Advancing public health and implementation science.癌症预防与控制研究网络(CPCRN):推进公共卫生和实施科学。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105824. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105824. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
9
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: Past, present, and future.结直肠癌的化学预防:过去、现在和未来。
Cancer Sci. 2019 Oct;110(10):3018-3026. doi: 10.1111/cas.14149. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
10
Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update.临床实践指南。结直肠癌的诊断与预防。2018年更新版。
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;41(9):585-596. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Sep 20.