Rogala Paweł, Czarnecka Anna M, Cybulska-Stopa Bożena, Ostaszewski Krzysztof, Piejko Karolina, Ziętek Marcin, Dziura Robert, Rutkowska Ewa, Galus Łukasz, Kempa-Kamińska Natasza, Seredyńska Joanna, Bal Wiesław, Kozak Katarzyna, Surus-Hyla Anna, Kubiatowski Tomasz, Kamińska-Winciorek Grażyna, Suwiński Rafał, Mackiewicz Jacek, Rutkowski Piotr
Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 24;14(9):2123. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092123.
(1) Background: BRAFi/MEKi are usually offered as a first line treatment for patients requiring rapid response; with elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, large tumor burden, and with brain metastases. The efficacy of second line therapies after BRAFi/MEKI failure is now well defined. (2) Methods: Patients treated with first line target BRAFi/MEKi therapy (vemurafenib plus cobimetinib, dabrafenib plus trametinib or encorafenib plus binimetinib); and for the second line treatment immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) with at least one cycle of second line were analyzed for survival and prognostic biomarkers. (3) Results: There were no statistically significant differences in ORR between the treatment groups with nivolumab and pembrolizumab, as well as median progression free-survival (PSF) and overall survival (OS) since the initiation of second line therapy; on nivolumab OS was 6.6 months, and on pembrolizumab 5.0 months. The greatest clinical benefit with second line immunotherapy was observed in patients with LDH ≤ ULN and <3 organ sites with metastasis at baseline. Longer OS was also noted in patients with time to PD >6 months in first line (slow progression). (4) Conclusions: Second line anti-PD1 immunotherapy is effective in BRAF-mutated melanoma patients after BRAFi/MEKi therapy failure.
(1) 背景:BRAF抑制剂/MEK抑制剂通常作为需要快速缓解的患者的一线治疗方案,用于乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)活性升高、肿瘤负荷大且有脑转移的患者。BRAF抑制剂/MEK抑制剂治疗失败后二线治疗的疗效现已明确。(2) 方法:分析接受一线靶向BRAF抑制剂/MEK抑制剂治疗(维莫非尼加考比替尼、达拉非尼加曲美替尼或恩考芬尼加比美替尼),以及接受二线程序性细胞死亡1(PD-1)检查点抑制剂免疫治疗(纳武利尤单抗或帕博利珠单抗)且至少接受一个二线治疗周期的患者的生存情况和预后生物标志物。(3) 结果:纳武利尤单抗和帕博利珠单抗治疗组之间的客观缓解率(ORR)、自二线治疗开始后的无进展生存期(PFS)中位数和总生存期(OS)均无统计学显著差异;纳武利尤单抗组的OS为6.6个月,帕博利珠单抗组为5.0个月。二线免疫治疗在基线时LDH≤正常上限且转移器官部位<3个的患者中观察到最大的临床获益。一线治疗中至疾病进展时间>6个月(进展缓慢)的患者OS也更长。(4) 结论:BRAF抑制剂/MEK抑制剂治疗失败后,二线抗PD-1免疫治疗对BRAF突变的黑色素瘤患者有效。