Guerini Andrea Emanuele, Tucci Alessandra, Alongi Filippo, Mataj Eneida, Belotti Angelo, Borghetti Paolo, Triggiani Luca, Pegurri Ludovica, Pedretti Sara, Bonù Marco, Tomasini Davide, Imbrescia Jessica, Donofrio Alessandra, Facheris Giorgio, Singh Navdeep, Volpi Giulia, Tomasi Cesare, Magrini Stefano Maria, Spiazzi Luigi, Buglione Michela
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
Department of Haematology, ASST-Spedali Civili Hospital, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 2;14(9):2273. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092273.
Background and purpose: Although chemotherapy, biological agents, and radiotherapy (RT) are cornerstones of the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), the literature regarding the possible interactions of concurrent systemic treatment (CST) and RT is limited, and the optimal RT dose is still unclear. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent RT for MM at our institution from 1 January 2005 to 30 June 2020. The data of 312 patients and 577 lesions (treated in 411 accesses) were retrieved. Results: Most of the treated lesions involved the vertebrae (60%) or extremities (18.9%). Radiotherapy was completed in 96.6% of the accesses and, although biologically effective doses assuming an α/β ratio of 10 (BED 10) > 38 Gy and CST were significantly associated with higher rates of toxicity, the safety profile was excellent, with side effects grade ≥2 reported only for 4.1% of the accesses; CST and BED 10 had no impact on the toxicity at one and three months. Radiotherapy resulted in significant improvements in performance status and in a pain control rate of 87.4% at the end of treatment, which further increased to 96.9% at three months and remained at 94% at six months. The radiological response rate at six months (data available for 181 lesions) was 79%, with only 4.4% of lesions in progression. Progression was significantly more frequent in the lesions treated without CST or BED 10 < 15 Gy, while concurrent biological therapy resulted in significantly lower rates of progression. Conclusion: Radiotherapy resulted in optimal pain control rates and fair toxicity, regardless of BED 10 and CST; the treatments with higher BED 10 and CST (remarkably biological agents) improved the already excellent radiological disease control.
尽管化疗、生物制剂和放射治疗(RT)是多发性骨髓瘤(MM)治疗的基石,但关于全身同步治疗(CST)与RT可能的相互作用的文献有限,且最佳放疗剂量仍不明确。材料与方法:我们回顾性分析了2005年1月1日至2020年6月30日在我院接受MM放疗患者的记录。检索到312例患者和577个病灶(411次治疗)的数据。结果:大多数治疗的病灶累及椎体(60%)或四肢(18.9%)。96.6%的治疗完成了放疗,尽管假设α/β比值为10(BED 10)>38 Gy的生物等效剂量和CST与较高的毒性发生率显著相关,但安全性良好,仅4.1%的治疗报告有≥2级副作用;CST和BED 10对1个月和3个月时的毒性无影响。放疗使患者的体能状态有显著改善,治疗结束时疼痛控制率为87.4%,3个月时进一步升至96.9%,6个月时仍保持在94%。6个月时的放射学缓解率(181个病灶有数据)为79%,仅4.4%的病灶进展。在未接受CST或BED 10<15 Gy治疗的病灶中进展明显更频繁,而同步生物治疗导致进展率显著降低。结论:无论BED 10和CST如何,放疗均能实现最佳的疼痛控制率且毒性尚可;较高BED 10和CST(尤其是生物制剂)的治疗改善了本已出色的放射学疾病控制效果。