Suppr超能文献

踝关节下胫腓联合损伤的10年随访:无结缝线纽扣固定与下胫腓联合螺钉固定的前瞻性比较

A 10-Year Follow-Up of Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: Prospective Comparison of Knotless Suture-Button Fixation and Syndesmotic Screw Fixation.

作者信息

Altmeppen Jan Niklas, Colcuc Christian, Balser Christian, Gramlich Yves, Klug Alexander, Neun Oliver, Manegold Sebastian, Hoffmann Reinhard, Fischer Sebastian

机构信息

Department for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, 60389 Frankfurt, Germany.

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Evangelical Hospital Bethel Bielefeld, 33611 Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 30;11(9):2524. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092524.

Abstract

Background: Acute syndesmosis injury (ASI) is an indication for surgical stabilization if instability is confirmed. In recent years, fixation using the knotless suture-button (SB) device has become increasingly established as an alternative to set screw fixation (SF). This study directly compared the clinical long-term results after prospective randomized inclusion. Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2012, 62 patients with ASI were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, and monocentric study. Forty-one patients were available for a 10-year follow-up ((31 males and 10 females), including 21 treated with SB (mean age 44.4 years), and 20 with SF (mean age 47.2 years)). In addition to comparing the demographic data and syndesmosis injury etiology, follow-up assessed the Olerud−Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and FADI-Score (Foot and Ankle Disability Index Score) with subscales for activities of daily living (ADL) and sports activity. Results: The mean OMAS was 95.98 points (SB: 98.81, SF: 93.00), the mean FADI ADL was 97.58 points (SB: 99.22, SF: 95.86), and the mean FADI Sport was 94.14 points (SB: 97.03, SF: 91.10). None of the measurements differed significantly between the groups (p > 0.05). No clinical suspicion of chronic instability remained in any of the patients, regardless of treatment. Conclusions: The short-term results showed that athletes in particular benefit from SB fixation due to their significantly faster return to sports activities. However, the available long-term results confirm a very good outcome in the clinical scores for both approaches. Chronic syndesmotic insufficiency was not suspected in any of the patients. Level of evidence: I, randomized controlled trial.

摘要

背景

如果确诊为不稳定型急性下胫腓联合损伤(ASI),则需进行手术稳定治疗。近年来,使用无结缝线纽扣(SB)装置进行固定已越来越多地成为螺钉固定(SF)的替代方法。本研究在前瞻性随机纳入患者后,直接比较了两者的临床长期结果。

材料与方法

2011年至2012年期间,62例ASI患者纳入一项前瞻性、随机、单中心研究。41例患者可进行10年随访(31例男性和10例女性),其中21例接受SB治疗(平均年龄44.4岁),20例接受SF治疗(平均年龄47.2岁)。除比较人口统计学数据和下胫腓联合损伤病因外,随访还评估了奥勒鲁德 - 莫兰德踝关节评分(OMAS)和足踝残疾指数评分(FADI-Score),以及日常生活活动(ADL)和体育活动的子量表。

结果

平均OMAS为95.98分(SB组:98.81分,SF组:93.00分),平均FADI ADL为97.58分(SB组:99.22分,SF组:95.86分),平均FADI体育评分为94.14分(SB组:97.03分,SF组:91.10分)。两组间各项测量结果均无显著差异(p>0.05)。无论采用何种治疗方法,所有患者均未出现慢性不稳定的临床怀疑。

结论

短期结果表明,运动员尤其受益于SB固定,因为他们能显著更快地恢复体育活动。然而,现有的长期结果证实,两种方法的临床评分结果都非常好。所有患者均未怀疑存在慢性下胫腓联合功能不全。证据级别:I,随机对照试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7cf/9105986/be99d63a383f/jcm-11-02524-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验