Department of Biomedical & Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
, Chicago, IL, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;194(1):25-33. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06615-2. Epub 2022 May 14.
To characterize current experiences with communication and decision-making practices when non-medical switching to a biosimilar trastuzumab is proposed or required by cancer center or insurer.
We developed and launched 60- and 51-item internet surveys to elicit US breast cancer patient and medical oncologist lived experiences with trastuzumab biosimilars and patient information needs and seeking practices. We recruited participants using social media and administered via REDCap in 2020-2021.
143 breast cancer patients and 33 medical oncologists completed the surveys. 63.9% patients reported having switched to a trastuzumab biosimilar and 40.8% reported receiving no prior notification about switching. 44% of patients reported learning about biosimilars primarily through self-directed learning and 41% wanting more time to discuss with oncologist. None of the oncologists reported that the decision to switch a patient to a biosimilar was initiated by them, but rather more frequently by the insurer (45.2%). About 54.8% reported not receiving any pharmaceutical manufacturer material related to the selected biosimilar. Patients and oncologists diverged in their responses to items regarding patient opportunities to ask questions, adequacy of resources, effectiveness of treatment, patient worry, and magnitude of change.
There is a need for tailored and effective patient and oncologist information and education on trastuzumab biosimilars, along with improved healthcare communication regarding switching. The discrepancy between patient-reported experiences and oncologist perceptions of the patient experience, suggests a lack of adequate information that may be a challenge not only to the uptake of trastuzumab biosimilars, but to the patient-oncologist relationship.
描述当前在非医学专业人员建议或要求癌症中心或保险公司切换至生物类似药曲妥珠单抗时,在沟通和决策实践方面的经验。
我们开发并发布了 60 项和 51 项在线调查,以了解美国乳腺癌患者和肿瘤内科医生对曲妥珠单抗生物类似药的体验,以及患者的信息需求和寻求实践。我们通过社交媒体招募参与者,并于 2020 年至 2021 年期间通过 REDCap 进行管理。
143 名乳腺癌患者和 33 名肿瘤内科医生完成了调查。63.9%的患者报告曾切换至曲妥珠单抗生物类似药,40.8%的患者报告在切换前未收到任何通知。44%的患者报告主要通过自主学习了解生物类似药,41%的患者希望有更多时间与肿瘤内科医生讨论。没有一位肿瘤内科医生报告说切换患者使用生物类似药的决定是由他们发起的,而是更多地由保险公司发起(45.2%)。约 54.8%的患者报告未收到与选定生物类似药相关的任何制药商材料。患者和肿瘤内科医生在关于患者提问机会、资源充足性、治疗效果、患者担忧和变化程度的项目的回答上存在分歧。
需要为患者和肿瘤内科医生提供关于曲妥珠单抗生物类似药的有针对性和有效的信息和教育,同时改善关于切换的医疗保健沟通。患者报告的经验与肿瘤内科医生对患者体验的看法之间存在差异,这表明缺乏足够的信息,这不仅对曲妥珠单抗生物类似药的使用构成挑战,而且对医患关系也构成挑战。