Suppr超能文献

患者是临床信息空间中的知识型员工。

Patients Are Knowledge Workers in the Clinical Information Space.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Jan;12(1):133-140. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723022. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited research exists on patient knowledge/cognition or "getting inside patients' heads." Because patients possess unique and privileged knowledge, clinicians need this information to make patient-centered and coordinated treatment planning decisions. To achieve patient-centered care, we characterize patient knowledge and contributions to the clinical information space.

METHODS AND OBJECTIVES

In a theoretical overview, we explore the relevance of patient knowledge to care provision, apply historical perspectives of knowledge acquisition to patient knowledge, propose a representation of patient knowledge types across the continuum of care, and include illustrative vignettes about Mr. Jones. We highlight how the field of human factors (a core competency of health informatics) provides a perspective and methods for eliciting and characterizing patient knowledge.

CONCLUSION

Patients play a vital role in the clinical information space by possessing and sharing unique knowledge relevant to the clinical picture. Without a patient's contributions, the clinical picture of the patient is incomplete. A human factors perspective informs patient-centered care and health information technology solutions to support clinical information sharing.

摘要

背景

关于患者知识/认知或“了解患者的想法”,相关研究有限。由于患者拥有独特且专属的知识,因此临床医生需要这些信息来制定以患者为中心且协调一致的治疗计划决策。为了实现以患者为中心的护理,我们将描述患者知识以及患者对临床信息空间的贡献。

方法和目的

在理论综述中,我们探讨了患者知识与护理提供之间的相关性,将知识获取的历史观点应用于患者知识,提出了贯穿整个护理连续体的患者知识类型的表示法,并包含了有关琼斯先生的说明性示例。我们强调了人类因素领域(健康信息学的核心能力之一)如何提供一种视角和方法来引出和描述患者知识。

结论

患者通过拥有和分享与临床情况相关的独特知识,在临床信息空间中发挥着至关重要的作用。如果没有患者的贡献,患者的临床情况就是不完整的。人类因素的观点为以患者为中心的护理和支持临床信息共享的健康信息技术解决方案提供了信息。

相似文献

1
Patients Are Knowledge Workers in the Clinical Information Space.
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Jan;12(1):133-140. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723022. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
Health Information Technology Challenges to Support Patient-Centered Care Coordination.
Yearb Med Inform. 2015 Aug 13;10(1):8-10. doi: 10.15265/IY-2015-028. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
5
Ten years of knowledge representation for health care (2009-2018): Topics, trends, and challenges.
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Sep;100:101713. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101713. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
7
Health informatics 3.0.
Yearb Med Inform. 2011;6:8-14.
8
Achieving Holistic Health for the Individual through Person-Centered Collaborative Care Supported by Informatics.
Healthc Inform Res. 2013 Mar;19(1):3-8. doi: 10.4258/hir.2013.19.1.3. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
9
Enabling patient-centered care through health information technology.
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Jun(206):1-1531.
10
Health care in the information society. A prognosis for the year 2013.
Int J Med Inform. 2002 Nov 20;66(1-3):3-21. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(02)00030-8.

引用本文的文献

3
Ergonomics of an In-Patient Hospitalization.
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70261. doi: 10.1111/hex.70261.
4
Patients as knowledge partners in the context of complex chronic conditions.
Med Humanit. 2025 Feb 24;51(1):34-38. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-012957.
6
Implementing an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome and Decision Support Tool in Early Intervention.
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):91-107. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760631. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
7
Patient lead users experience of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study.
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 17;12(8):e059003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059003.
8
Digital Health Technologies Enabling Partnerships in Chronic Care Management: Scoping Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 1;24(8):e38980. doi: 10.2196/38980.
10
Older Adult Patients and Care Partners as Knowledge Brokers in Fragmented Health Care.
Hum Factors. 2024 Mar;66(3):701-713. doi: 10.1177/00187208221092847. Epub 2022 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
How and why patients made Long Covid.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;268:113426. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113426. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
2
A History of #BCSM and Insights for Patient-Centered Online Interaction and Engagement.
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2020 Oct 23;7(4):304-312. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1753. eCollection 2020 Fall.
3
Brain Tumor Discussions on Twitter (#BTSM): Social Network Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):e22005. doi: 10.2196/22005.
4
Patient researchers - the missing link?
Nat Med. 2020 Oct;26(10):1507. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1080-4.
5
Citizen science to further precision medicine: from vision to implementation.
JAMIA Open. 2019 Dec 3;3(1):2-8. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz060. eCollection 2020 Apr.
6
Patient decision-making personas: An application of a patient-centered cognitive task analysis (P-CTA).
Appl Ergon. 2020 Sep;87:103107. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103107. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
8
Patient ergonomics: 10-year mapping review of patient-centered human factors.
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102972. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102972. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
9
Knowledge among patients with heart failure: A narrative synthesis of qualitative research.
Heart Lung. 2019 Nov-Dec;48(6):477-485. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
10
Infinicare framework for integrated understanding of health-related activities in clinical and daily-living contexts.
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2017 Nov 7;7(1):66-78. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2017.1390060. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验