Yan Songxin, Peng Yu, Cheng Linlin, Li Haolong, Zhan Haoting, Zhang Xinyao, Li Zepeng, Zhang Wen, Li Yongzhe
Department of Clinical Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Rheumatology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Mod Rheumatol. 2023 Apr 13;33(3):594-598. doi: 10.1093/mr/roac047.
An immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) level above 1350 mg/L is one of the comprehensive criteria for the diagnosis of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in IgG4 levels determined using reagents from two main manufacturers and their concordance with clinical diagnosis.
IgG4 levels were measured in 309 patients, including 146, 40, 42, 41, and 40 patients with untreated IgG4-RD, pancreatic cancer, primary Sjogren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, and idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis, respectively, and 141 healthy controls. The results obtained using the Binding Site and Siemens reagents were compared in patients with IgG4-RD.
The serum IgG4 level measured using the Siemens reagent was almost two times that measured using the Binding Site reagent. The rate of IgG4-negative patients, which was 19.9% based on measurement using the Binding Site reagent, was only 4.8% based on measurement using the Siemens reagent (p < .001).
There were significant differences in serum IgG4 levels based on commonly used reagents from different manufacturers. The IgG4 cut-off level of 1350 mg/L was not suitable for all detection reagents. Clinicians and patients should be cognizant of these differences associated with the specific detection reagents when evaluating the test results.
免疫球蛋白G4(IgG4)水平高于1350mg/L是诊断IgG4相关疾病(IgG4-RD)的综合标准之一。本研究旨在评估使用两家主要制造商的试剂测定的IgG4水平差异及其与临床诊断的一致性。
对309例患者进行了IgG4水平检测,其中分别有146例、40例、42例、41例和40例患者患有未经治疗的IgG4-RD、胰腺癌、原发性干燥综合征、系统性红斑狼疮和特发性腹膜后纤维化,另有141名健康对照者。比较了IgG4-RD患者使用Binding Site和西门子试剂获得的结果。
使用西门子试剂测定的血清IgG4水平几乎是使用Binding Site试剂测定值的两倍。基于Binding Site试剂测定,IgG4阴性患者的比例为19.9%,而基于西门子试剂测定仅为4.8%(p<0.001)。
基于不同制造商的常用试剂,血清IgG4水平存在显著差异。1350mg/L的IgG4临界值并不适用于所有检测试剂。临床医生和患者在评估检测结果时应认识到与特定检测试剂相关的这些差异。