J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(6):1247-1255. doi: 10.3233/BMR-210177.
Dry needling (DN) is commonly used to treat myofascial trigger points (MTrPs).
To compare the effect between DN with and without needle retention in the treatment of MTrPs in the upper trapezius muscle.
Fifty-four patients who had active MTrPs in the upper trapezius muscle were randomly allocated into the DN group or the DN with retention group. The DN group received DN only, while the DN with retention group received DN with needle retention for 30 minutes. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were recorded both before and after 7 and 14 days of the treatment sessions.
Both groups showed a significant decrease of the VAS at 7 and 14 days (mean difference DN group -53.0, DN with retention group -57.0, p< 0.001). The PPT was also significantly improved in both groups (mean difference DN group 109.8 kPa, DN with retention group 132.3 kPa, p< 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the VAS or PPT between the groups.
Both DN and DN with retention had significant improvement of pain intensity in the treatment of MTrPs in the upper trapezius muscle at 14 days. However, pain reduction was not significantly different between the interventions.
干针疗法(DN)常用于治疗肌筋膜触发点(MTrPs)。
比较在上斜方肌中使用带针和不带针留置的 DN 治疗 MTrPs 的效果。
将 54 例上斜方肌有活动性 MTrPs 的患者随机分为 DN 组或带针留置的 DN 组。DN 组仅接受 DN,而带针留置的 DN 组则接受 30 分钟的带针留置 DN。治疗前后分别记录视觉模拟评分(VAS)和压力疼痛阈值(PPT)。
两组在 7 天和 14 天时 VAS 均显著下降(DN 组平均差值-53.0,带针留置的 DN 组-57.0,p<0.001)。两组的 PPT 也均显著改善(DN 组平均差值 109.8kPa,带针留置的 DN 组 132.3kPa,p<0.001)。然而,两组间 VAS 或 PPT 无显著差异。
在治疗上斜方肌 MTrPs 时,DN 和带针留置的 DN 在 14 天时均显著改善了疼痛强度。然而,两种干预措施的疼痛缓解程度无显著差异。