Journée Sanne Lotte, Journée Henricus Louis, Berends Hanneke Irene, Reed Steven Michael, Bergmann Wilhelmina, de Bruijn Cornelis Marinus, Delesalle Cathérine John Ghislaine
Equine Diagnostics, Wyns, Netherlands.
Research Group of Comparative Physiology, Department of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Apr 27;16:851463. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.851463. eCollection 2022.
So far, only transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) of the extensor carpi radialis and tibialis cranialis have been documented for diagnostic evaluation in horses. These allow for differentiating whether lesions are located in either the thoraco-lumbar region or in the cervical myelum and/or brain. Transcranial trapezius MEPs further enable to distinguish between spinal and supraspinal located lesions. No normative data are available. It is unclear whether transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are interchangeable modalities.
To provide normative data for trapezius MEP parameters in horses for TES and TMS and to discern direct and indirect conduction routes by neurophysiological models that use anatomical geometric characteristics to relate latency times with peripheral (PCV) and central conduction velocities (CCV).
Transcranial electrical stimulation-induced trapezius MEPs were obtained from twelve horses. TES and TMS-MEPs (subgroup 5 horses) were compared intra-individually. Trapezius MEPs were measured bilaterally twice at 5 intensity steps. Motoneurons were localized using nerve conduction models of the cervical and spinal accessory nerves (SAN). Predicted CCVs were verified by multifidus MEP data from two horses referred for neurophysiological assessment.
Mean MEP latencies revealed for TES: 13.5 (11.1-16.0)ms and TMS: 19.7 (12-29.5)ms, comprising ∼100% direct routes and for TMS mixed direct/indirect routes of L:23/50; R:14/50. Left/right latency decreases over 10 > 50 V for TES were: -1.4/-1.8 ms and over 10 > 50% for TMS: -1.7/-3.5 ms. Direct route TMS-TES latency differences were 1.88-4.30 ms. 95% MEP amplitudes ranges for TES were: L:0.26-22 mV; R:0.5-15 mV and TMS: L:0.9 - 9.1 mV; R:1.1-7.9 mV.
This is the first study to report normative data characterizing TES and TMS induced- trapezius MEPs in horses. The complex trapezius innervation leaves TES as the only reliable stimulation modality. Differences in latency times along the SAN route permit for estimation of the location of active motoneurons, which is of importance for clinical diagnostic purpose. SAN route lengths and latency times are governed by anatomical locations of motoneurons across C2-C5 segments. TES intensity-dependent reductions of trapezius MEP latencies are similar to limb muscles while MEP amplitudes between sides and between TES and TMS are not different. CCVs may reach 180 m/s.
迄今为止,在马匹的诊断评估中,仅记录了桡侧腕伸肌和胫前肌的经颅运动诱发电位(MEP)。这些电位可用于区分病变是位于胸腰段还是颈髓和/或脑部。经颅斜方肌MEP还能进一步区分位于脊髓和脊髓以上的病变。目前尚无规范性数据。尚不清楚经颅电刺激(TES)和经颅磁刺激(TMS)是否为可互换的方式。
为马匹斜方肌MEP参数提供TES和TMS的规范性数据,并通过使用解剖几何特征将潜伏期与外周(PCV)和中枢传导速度(CCV)相关联的神经生理模型来辨别直接和间接传导途径。
从12匹马中获取经颅电刺激诱发的斜方肌MEP。对TES和TMS-MEP(5匹马的亚组)进行个体内比较。在5个强度步骤下双侧测量斜方肌MEP两次。使用颈神经和副神经(SAN)的神经传导模型定位运动神经元。通过来自两匹转诊进行神经生理评估的马匹的多裂肌MEP数据验证预测的CCV。
TES的平均MEP潜伏期显示为:13.5(11.1 - 16.0)ms,TMS为:19.7(12 - 29.5)ms,其中TES约100%为直接途径,TMS为L:23/50;R:14/50的混合直接/间接途径。TES在10 > 50 V时左右侧潜伏期减少分别为:-1.4/-1.8 ms,TMS在10 > 50%时为:-1.7/-3.5 ms。直接途径TMS - TES潜伏期差异为1.88 - 4.30 ms。TES的95% MEP波幅范围为:左侧:0.26 - 22 mV;右侧:0.5 - 15 mV,TMS为:左侧:0.9 - 9.1 mV;右侧:1.1 - 7.9 mV。
这是第一项报告马匹中TES和TMS诱发斜方肌MEP特征规范性数据的研究。复杂的斜方肌神经支配使TES成为唯一可靠的刺激方式。沿SAN途径潜伏期的差异允许估计活跃运动神经元的位置,这对临床诊断目的很重要。SAN途径长度和潜伏期受C2 - C5节段运动神经元解剖位置的支配。斜方肌MEP潜伏期的TES强度依赖性降低与肢体肌肉相似,而两侧之间以及TES和TMS之间的MEP波幅无差异。CCV可能达到180 m/s。