• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

它几乎可以自行驾驶:自动驾驶汽车技术、心理态度以及对危险驾驶行为的易感性。

It practically drives itself: autonomous vehicle technology, psychological attitudes, and susceptibility to risky driving behaviors.

作者信息

Azuma Miki Casey, Giordano Frank Bryan, Stoffregen Stacy Ann, Klos Leah Shely, Lee Jin

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2023 Feb;66(2):246-260. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2076906. Epub 2022 May 31.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2022.2076906
PMID:35574696
Abstract

This study examines how favourable attitudes towards autonomous vehicle technology and automation-induced complacency relate to unsafe driving behaviours using semi-autonomous vehicles as an exemplar. The sample consisted of 441 college students and a repeated measures design was used to examine the relationships between psychological attitudes and susceptibility to risky driving behaviours across three scenarios. Linear regression analyses were conducted for hypothesis testing. Study 1 showed that favourable attitudes towards autonomous vehicle technologies were not significantly associated with susceptibility to risky driving behaviours. Study 2 replicated this finding, however, automation-induced complacency was significantly associated with susceptibility to risky driving behaviours. Additionally, evidence was found for the incremental validity of automation-induced complacency over favourable attitudes towards autonomous features. In distinguishing favourable attitudes towards autonomous features from automation-induced complacency, future research and policy-making can separately address these constructs for the promotion of traffic safety and policy-making. We aimed to assess inclinations towards risky driving behaviours in semi-autonomous vehicles. Using vignettes, we found that favourable attitudes towards autonomous vehicles are not associated with risky behaviours, but automation-induced complacency was. Our findings suggest policies like educational programs can be implemented to prevent misuse of semi-autonomous vehicles.

摘要

本研究以半自动驾驶汽车为例,考察对自动驾驶汽车技术的积极态度以及自动化导致的自满情绪与不安全驾驶行为之间的关系。样本包括441名大学生,并采用重复测量设计来检验三种情景下心理态度与危险驾驶行为易感性之间的关系。进行线性回归分析以进行假设检验。研究1表明,对自动驾驶汽车技术的积极态度与危险驾驶行为易感性没有显著关联。研究2重复了这一发现,然而,自动化导致的自满情绪与危险驾驶行为易感性显著相关。此外,还发现了自动化导致的自满情绪相对于对自动驾驶功能的积极态度具有增量效度的证据。在区分对自动驾驶功能的积极态度和自动化导致的自满情绪方面,未来的研究和政策制定可以分别针对这些构念来促进交通安全和政策制定。我们旨在评估半自动驾驶汽车中危险驾驶行为的倾向。通过使用情景描述,我们发现对自动驾驶汽车的积极态度与危险行为无关,但自动化导致的自满情绪与之有关。我们的研究结果表明,可以实施诸如教育项目等政策来防止对半自动驾驶汽车的滥用。

相似文献

1
It practically drives itself: autonomous vehicle technology, psychological attitudes, and susceptibility to risky driving behaviors.它几乎可以自行驾驶:自动驾驶汽车技术、心理态度以及对危险驾驶行为的易感性。
Ergonomics. 2023 Feb;66(2):246-260. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2076906. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
Development and classification of autonomous vehicle's ambiguous driving scenario.自动驾驶车辆模糊驾驶场景的发展与分类
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Jun;200:107501. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107501. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
A case study of unavoidable accidents of autonomous vehicles.自动驾驶汽车不可避免事故的案例研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(1):8-13. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2255333. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
4
Automation complacency on the road.道路上的自动化自满情绪。
Ergonomics. 2023 Nov;66(11):1730-1749. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2210793. Epub 2023 May 12.
5
Who is to blame for crashes involving autonomous vehicles? Exploring blame attribution across the road transport system.谁应为自动驾驶汽车事故负责?探究道路运输系统中的责任归因。
Ergonomics. 2020 May;63(5):525-537. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1744064. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
6
Law compliance decision making for autonomous vehicles on highways.高速公路自动驾驶汽车的法律合规决策。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Sep;204:107620. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107620. Epub 2024 May 31.
7
Risk of automated driving: Implications on safety acceptability and productivity.自动驾驶的风险:对安全可接受性和生产力的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Apr;125:257-266. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
Experimental examination of the effects of televised motor vehicle commercials on risk-positive attitudes, emotions and risky driving inclinations.关于电视机动车广告对风险积极态度、情绪和危险驾驶倾向影响的实验研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Feb;75:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
9
A comparative study of state-of-the-art driving strategies for autonomous vehicles.自动驾驶汽车最先进驾驶策略的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Feb;150:105937. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105937. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
10
A matched case-control analysis of autonomous vs human-driven vehicle accidents.自动驾驶汽车与人工驾驶汽车事故的配对病例对照分析。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 18;15(1):4931. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48526-4.